JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Psychiatry/Mental Health Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/32288.11130
Year : 2018 | Month : Jan | Volume : 12 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : VC08 - VC13

Depression, its Correlates and Effects in Ever Married Urban Women Residing in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand

Mrinmay Das1, Amandeep Kaur2, Hariom Kumar Solanki3, Chandramohan Singh Rawat4, Sadhana Awasthi5, Sneha Mittal6

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
4 Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
5 Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
6 Junior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Amandeep Kaur, Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Haldwani-263129, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: amansmailbox82@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

In the global context, independent studies on depression show that women are twice as likely as men to suffer from clinical depression. It is also described as an important cause of premature mortality either from physical disorders or from suicides.

Aim

To determine the burden of depression, to identify the related factors and assess its effects on functionality and suicidal ideation.

Materials and Methods

The present cross-divtional study was conducted in urban area of Haldwani, Kumaon Region, Uttarakhand, India. Taking anticipated prevalence of depression as 24.9% and taking non-response rate of 15% the sample size was estimated to be 320. Ever married women of age group 18-59 years who gave informed consent were included. Population proportional to size method was used to determine the number of women to be interviewed and individual households were selected by systematic random sampling. The data was collected on relevant factors using a pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire along with the PHQ-9 scale administration.

Results

Clinically significant depression was present in 18.8% women. Burden of depression was found to be maximum in women belonging to 35-44 years. Significantly higher odds of developing depression was seen in women who stayed in joint families or families with issues of substance abuse, economic instability, and family disputes with husband. Education of children and concern about their future also acted as an important factor along with unsatisfactory self-image. Depression was found to be significantly associated with functionality and suicidal ideation.

Conclusion

Burden of depression was found to be high in the ever-married women residing in urban area and is particularly related with social factors and self-image.

Keywords

Introduction

In India, many goddesses are worshipped as the symbol of power, wealth and blessing; but in reality most women are treated as trivial beings. Women are vulnerable not only because of enormous physiological variations experienced throughout their life but also because of the complexity of relation with the society. Depressive disorders evolve because of these complex biopsychosocial factors.

Overall, depression is the most common psychiatric disorder in the general population [1]. Globally, independent studies on depression show that women are twice as likely as men to suffer from clinical depression [2]. The lifetime prevalence of major depressive disorder is 10–25% for women, and 5–12% for men, in the world [3]. Work and home responsibilities, caring for children and ageing parents, abuse, and poverty may trigger a depressive episode in women, besides stressful life events [4]. Their toil on almost all the days of a year without any sick leave or casual leave makes them even more susceptible. Yet, mental health in women is conceived chiefly in terms of reproductive health, and other areas get little consideration [5].

The effects of depression extend beyond the individual patient, with negative impact on patients spouses and children [6,7]. It is also described as an important cause of premature mortality either from physical disorders or from suicides [8]. Universally, attempted suicides are around three times higher among women than men, especially among those suffering from depression [9].

Depression is the most common mental health condition in patients seeking primary care [10,11]. However, unless directly asked about their mood, patients omit information about depressive symptoms for a variety of reasons like fear of stigmatisation, issues of confidentiality and misconceptions related to the disease. In the absence of screening, it is estimated that only 50% of patients with major depression are identified [12,13].

Empirical knowledge of regional prevalence is fundamental to understanding the relative demand for services and to identify most appropriate avenues for intervention and health policy development. Also, understanding the socio-demographic determinants gives us a key to primary prevention.

Little is known about the status of the mental health morbidity of women residing in the urban areas of Uttarakhand. Therefore, this study was undertaken as an effort to find the burden of depression, to identify the related factors and also, to create awareness regarding various aspects of prevention and management of depressive disorders and reduce stigma, so that women confined in the four walls of their homes are able to get some ventilation and light.

Materials and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted in urban field practice area of Government Medical College (GMC), Haldwani, District Nainital, Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand, India from June 2016 to May 2017. The field practice area is divided in four sectors with total population of 2637. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

Ever married women of age group 18-59 years residing in the area for more than six months and who gave written informed consent were included in the study. Women who were severely ill or intellectually disabled during the study and could not cooperate; had history of child birth within three months of interview and were pregnant at the time of data collection were excluded.

Sample size: Taking anticipated Prevalence (P) of depression as 24.9% (on the basis of study done in Kerala, India [14]) with 95% Confidence Interval and 5% precision, the sample size was estimated to be 276. Taking 15% non-response the final sample size was calculated as 320.

Study tool: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 Hindi for India version, freely available in public domain was used. The score of ≥10 were taken as possible depressive disorder (clinically significant depression) which has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. This scale can be administered by any trained person in the community, not necessarily a psychiatrist [15,16].

The women were asked about the listed symptoms being experienced in the past two weeks. The scale was administered by trained doctors posted at the urban health and training center of Department of Community Medicine, GMC, Haldwani, under the supervision of principal investigator. The training was done by one of the authors - working as a Psychiatrist at the associated tertiary care hospital of GMC, Haldwani.

Sampling and data collection: Population proportional to size method was used to determine the number of women to be interviewed from each of the four sectors described previously. Thereafter, individual households were selected by systematic random sampling. The purpose of the study was explained to the eligible women present in the selected households. If any household had more than one eligible woman, one woman was selected by draw method. If the women did not give consent for the study or if there were no eligible women in the selected household the adjacent household was taken and same process repeated until we had an eligible women consenting to participate in the study. In total, 324 women were interviewed. The data was collected using a pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire along with the PHQ-9 scale administration. Effects of depression - able to perform daily activities (functionality) and presence of suicidal ideation - were also assessed. Privacy of participants and confidentiality of data was maintained at all stages of the study. The women who were screened positive for moderate to severe depression were referred to the Psychiatry Department, GMC, Haldwani, for further management.

Statistical Analysis

The data so collected was coded, entered and compiled in MS Excel, and tabulated and analysed using SPSS (version 17.0). Depression prevalence was calculated, and multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess associations between risk factors. The dependent variable (depression) was dichotomised. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed using all relevant socioeconomic variables and variables with p-value <0.25 were considered in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Chi-square test was used in analysis of functionality and suicidal ideation.

Results

A total of 324 women agreed to participate in the present study. The doughnut-chart shows the severity of depression according to PHQ-9 scale [Table/Fig-1]. Clinically significant depression was present in 61 (18.8%) of the study subjects, out of which 11 (3.4%) had severe, 22 (6.8%) had moderately severe and 28 (8.6%) had moderate depression.

Doughnut-chart depicting the severity of depression (n=324).

The detailed socio-demographic and reproductive profile of the interviewed women along with the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio of the variables studied is given in [Table/Fig-2].

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio for depression and socio-demographic and reproductive variables.

S. No.VariableFrequency n (%)Unadjusted odds ratioAdjusted Odds Ratio
Odds ratio (95% CI)p-valueOdds ratio (95% CI)p-value
1.Women’s Age
<25 years27 (8.3)110.741
25-34 years163 (50.3)0.446 (0.169 – 1.177)0.1030.748 (0.158 – 3.544)0.714
35-44 years105 (32.4)0.989 (0.377 – 2.597)0.9821.202 (0.203 – 7.122)0.839
≥45 years29 (9.0)0.457 (0.117 – 1.785)0.2600.611 (0.075 – 4.991)0.646
2.Age difference with husband
0-3 years46 (14.2)1----
4-6 years155 (47.8)0.867 (0.375 – 2.006)0.739
7-9 years80 (24.7)0.798 (0.312 – 2.042)0.637
≥10 years43 (13.3)1.413 (0.520 – 3.841)0.498
3.Women’s Education
Illiterate and Primary88 (27.2)110.499
Middle and Sec./Sen. Sec.154 (53.7)0.433 (0.235 – 0.795)0.0071.004 (0.370 – 2.727)0.993
Graduate and Postgraduate82 (25.3)0.104 (0.035 – 0.313)0.0000.385 (0.062 – 2.375)0.304
4.Husband’s Education
Illiterate and Primary51 (15.7)110.804
Middle and Sec./Sen. Sec.174 (53.7)0.429 (0.216 – 0.854)0.0160.708 (0.215 – 2.334)0.571
Graduate and Postgraduate99 (30.6)0.183 (0.075 – 0.448)0.0000.870 (0.154 – 4.923)0.875
5.Religion
Hindu269 (83.0)11
Others55 (15.7)3.271 (1.718 – 6.229)0.0002.408 (0.795 – 7.297)0.120
6.Type of family
Nuclear273 (84.3)11
Joint51 (15.7)1.867 (0.935 – 3.730)0.0774.003 (1.400 – 11.44)0.010
7.Type of House
Pucca*294 (90.7)11
Kuchha/Semipucca**30 (9.3)2.895 (1.296 – 6.464)0.0100.589 (0.167 – 2.077)0.411
8.Ownership of House
Self202 (62.3)1----
Rented122 (37.7)1.338 (0.758 – 2.364)0.315
9.Marital Status
Currently married307 (94.8)1
Widow/Separated17 (5.2)3.355 (1.222 – 9.213)0.0191.759 (0.383 – 8.084)0.468
10.Age at Marriage
<18 years57 (17.6)110.076
18-20 years132 (40.7)0.306 (0.154 – 0.607)0.0010.655 (0.219 – 1.959)0.449
21-23 years86 (26.5)0.103 (0.039 – 0.275)0.0000.133 (0.031 – 0.574)0.007
24-26 years30 (9.3)0.153 (0.041 – 0.563)0.0050.232 (0.232 – 2.294)0.212
>26 years19 (5.9)0.258 (0.067 – 0.985)0.0470.645 (0.645 – 5.952)0.699
11.Duration of Marriage
≤5 years65 (20.1)1----
6-10 years83 (25.6)0.996 (0.419 – 2.369)0.993
11-15 years68 (21.0)1.052 (0.428 – 2.586)0.912
≥16 years108 (33.3)1.328 (0.600 – 2.943)0.484
12.Infertility
No308 (95.1)1----
Primary10 (3.1)1.929 (0.484 – 7.690)0.352
Secondary06 (1.9)0.900 (0.103 – 7.855)0.924
13.Conceptions
010 (3.1)10.099
1-252 (16.0)0.194 (0.036 – 1.058)0.0580.039 (0.002 – 0.620)0.022
2-3188 (58.0)0.461 (0.113 – 1.880)0.2800.046 (0.004 – 0.554)0.015
≥474 (22.8)0.987 (0.234 – 4.173)0.9860.046 (0.003 – 0.640)0.022
14.Living Children
012 (3.7)1----
1-2210 (64.8)0.443 (0.113 – 1.738)0.253
3-4102 (31.5)1.250 (0.316 – 4.940)0.750
15.Living Male Children
064 (19.8)10.582
1-2239 (73.8)0.719 (0.356 – 1.451)0.3571.746 (0.516 – 5.907)0.370
3-421 (6.5)3.566 (1.247 –10.200)0.0182.450 (0.375 – 16.016)0.350
16.Living Female Children
0101 (31.2)1----
1-2203 (62.7)0.899 (0.485 – 1.668)0.736
3-420 (6.2)1.850 (0.629 – 5.440)0.264
17.Substance abuse in family
Not present277 (85.5)11
Present47 (14.5)3.378 (1.725 – 6.614)0.0014.494 (1.467 – 13.76)0.009
18.Perceived Economic stability
Present214 (66.0)1
Not present110 (34.0)6.988 (3.774 – 12.941)0.0003.856 (1.581 – 9.401)0.003
19.Family relations
Good291 (89.8)110.016
Problem with in-laws18 (5.6)4.743 (1.770 – 12.707)0.0083.016 (0.617 – 14.747)0.173
Problem with husband15 (4.6)16.304 (4.959 – 53.600)0.0008.124 (1.715 – 38.476)0.008
20.Reasons related to children
Nil / Infertility136 (42.0)10.50010.021
Health12 (3.7)1.743 (0.346 – 8.770)0.5000.843 (0.020 – 34.756)0.928
Education105 (32.4)3.325 (1.653 – 6.691)0.0015.365 (1.850 – 15.555)0.002
Job/Livelihood/Girl’s Marriage71 (21.9)2.535 (1.157 – 5.556)0.0202.306 (0.699 – 7.615)0.170
21.Disease in family
Nil232 (71.6)110.184
Self / husband47 (14.5)2.986 (1.496 – 5.960)0.0023.374 (1.193 – 9.537)0.022
Children10 (3.1)2.259 (0.558 – 9.136)0.2534.757 (0.217 – 104.46)0.322
Anyone relative19 (5.9)0.293 (0.038 – 2.261)0.2390.587 (0.054 – 6.418)0.662
More than one member16 (4.9)1.216 (0.330 – 4.479)0.7691.547 (0.201 – 11.922)0.676
22.Self-image
Satisfactory280 (86.4)110.030
Unsatisfactory-Less educated28 (8.6)3.471 (1.523 – 7.911)0.0033.674 (1.015 – 13.295)0.047
Unsatisfactory-unable to work16 (4.9)3.218 (1.113 – 9.308)0.0256.400 (0.918 – 44.619)0.061

* Pucca: all structure built with bricks and concrete

**Kuchha/Semipucca: walls and/or roof and/or floor-not made of concrete


In [Table/Fig-2] unadjusted odds ratio demonstrates depression to be less prevalent in women of higher age group but the results were not significant. Women with age difference of more than ten years with their husbands were found to be more depressed. Occurrence of depression decreased significantly with increase in the level of education of both the women and her husband. Women of faith other than Hindus were significantly more depressed. Also, the burden of depression among women staying in semi-pucca or kuchha house and the ones who were widowed or separated was significantly high.

The unadjusted odds of presence of depression was observed to be significantly lower in ladies married after 18 years than those married before attaining majority. Another finding of the present study was that although number of conceptions and number of children did not significantly affect incidence of depression, depression was seen to increase significantly if the women had more than three male children [Table/Fig-2].

The [Table/Fig-2] also shows results of multivariable model adjusted for various covariates selected on the basis of pre-decided cut-off for unadjusted odds ratio. The Hosmer and Lemeshow test was found to be not significant for the model (Chi-square 7.839, df 8, Sig. 0.449). Even when adjusted for other variables, women living in joint families were found to be significantly more afflicted with depression. It was also observed that there was significantly lower odds incidence of depression among ladies who were married between 21 and 23 years than any other age and also in the ladies who conceived at least once in comparison to the women never conceived.

In both univariate and multivariate analysis, significantly higher odds of developing depression was seen in women who stayed in families with issues of substance abuse, economic instability, and family disputes with husband. It was observed that education of children and also concern about their future acted as a more important factor in development of depression instead of the health of children, rather health issues in self or husband were more significant predictors of depression. The odds of presence of depression was more in women who felt that they were less educated, likewise the women who felt that they should have been working, although the result was significant for the later only [Table/Fig-2].

More than half of the subjects with severe and moderately severe depression found it very difficult to carry out their daily routine work. The association between functionality / functional health level and depression was statistically significant [Table/Fig-3]. The presence of suicidal ideas increasedsignificantly with the increase in severity of depression [Table/Fig-4].

Distribution of functionality of women with severity of depression.

Depression SeverityDaily Activities
Not difficultSomewhat difficultVery difficultExtremely difficultTotal
None-minimal1691710187
(79.3%)(21.0%)(4.3%)(0.0%)(57.7%)
(90.4%)(9.1%)(0.5%)(0.0%)(100.0%)
Mild40360076
(18.8%)(44.4%)(0.0%)(0.0%)(23.8%)
(52.6%)(47.4%)(0.0%)(0.0%)(100.0%)
Moderate4213028
(1.9%)(25.9%)(13.0%)(0.0%)(8.6%)
(14.3%)(75.0%)(10.7%)(0.0%)(100.0%)
Moderately Severe0513422
(0.0%)(6.2%)(56.5%)(57.1%)(6.8%)
(0.0%)(22.7%)(59.1%)(18.2%)(100.0%)
Severe026311
(0.0%)(2.5%)(26.1%)(42.9%)(3.4%)
(0.0%)(18.2%)(54.5%)(27.3%)(100.0%)
Total21381237324
(100.0%)(100.0%)(100.0%)(100.0%)(100.0%)
(65.7%)(25.0%)(7.1%)(2.2%)(100.0%)

Pearson Chi-sqaure=315.063, df=12, p-value<0.001


Relation of women with depression and suicidal ideation.

Depression SeveritySuicidal Ideation
Suicidal ideas not presentSuicidal ideas presentTotal
None-minimal1870187
(65.2%)(00.0%)(57.7%)
(100.0%)(00.0%)(100.0%)
Mild76076
(26.4%)(00.0%)(26.4%)
(100.0%)(00.0%)(100.0%)
Moderate161228
(5.6%)(33.3%)(8.6%)
(57.1%)(42.9%)(100.0%)
Moderately Severe81422
(2.8%)(38.9%)(6.8%)
(36.4%)(63.3%)(100.0%)
Severe11011
(0.3%)(27.8%)(3.4%)
(9.1%)(90.9%)(100.0%)
Total28836324
(100.0%)(100.0%)(100.0%)
(88.9%)(11.1%)(100.0%)

Pearson Chi-sqaure=193.821, df=4, p-value<0.001


Discussion

In the present study, clinically significant depression present in 18.8% women. Our study result is consistent with the figures reported for developing countries (10–44%) by the WHO [17] and Poongothai S et al., [18]. Recently published National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) reported prevalence of depression as 2.7% in India. The difference in findings may be because the survey was conducted in both rural and urban populations and used Mini International Neuro-Psychiatric Inventory (MINI) as the screening tool; but, the same study also stated that prevalence of depressive disorders are higher in females and especially ones residing in urban areas [19].

In a study conducted in Karachi, Pakistan, comparatively higher burden of depression was observed which could have been due to difference in cultures; though in our study also we have found odds of presence of depression to be more in Muslim women [20].

Age of woman: In the present study, adjusted odds of depression was maximum in women belonging to 35-44 years followed by ones with age less than 25 years [Table/Fig-2]. However, study conducted by Poongothai S et al., reported prevalence of depression to increase with increasing age [18]; but Akram B and Khuwaja F, the mean comparison reflected higher depression level after 40 years [21].

The reason for the findings in our study may be that as lady reaches 35 years, concerns regarding future of their family, especially children, increase and also increase the responsibilities of taking care of the elders–this increases stress, and subsequently depression. However, as the age increases further, women get adjusted to the situations of life. The reason for women <25 years being more depressed may be the burden of adjustment required after marriage; also, there is hassle of changed lifestyles and competition for survival which has increased drastically in present times. Fahey N et al., have explained that the protective trend observed with increasing age is based on the change in women’s position in the patriarchal social construct [22]. Older women might experience greater autonomy and play a larger role in household decision making, which enables them to navigate stressful situations more effectively.

Age difference with husband: The cause of women with age difference of more than ten years with their husbands being more depressed may be the underlying difference in maturity, experiences, social position and financial control [Table/Fig-2]. Similar results have been reported in study conducted by Kim JH et al., [23].

Education: Occurrence of depression decreased significantly with increase in the level of education of both the women and her husband in bivariate analysis [Table/Fig-2]. This finding is also supported by other studies [18,21,22,24,25]. Education enhances self-esteem, autonomy and coping capability of women, which might be the underlying mechanism for the observed protective effects.

Notably, in our study, when adjusted for other variables, depression was marginally high in women educated up to middle and secondary/senior secondary level [Table/Fig-2]. The reason comprehensible during the interview was that these women were educated enough to understand the importance of being self-dependent but not to the extent so as to be so in reality.

Religion: In our study, presence of depression was found to be significantly higher among females belonging to religion other than Hindu [Table/Fig-2]. Similar findings were reported in the study conducted by Nandi DN et al., [26].

Marital status: As in our study, significantly higher depression among women with disrupted married life was found by multiple studies conducted in Indian subcontinent [18,22,24].

Type of family: Burden of depression was observed to be significantly higher in women living in joint families [Table/Fig-2]. This is consistent with the finding of systematic review by Mirza I and Jenkins R [24]; but is in contrast to the findings of Akram B and Khuwaja F, who observed that the working women who lived in nuclear family system reported higher depression [21]. Different observation in our study may be due to the different cultural and societal structure of the countries and also because our study participants were all homemakers. Sethi BB and Sharma M also found depression to be higher in nuclear families; but their study was conducted in 1980’s and times have changed drastically since then [27] . In the present scenario of transitional societies, women find themselves more burdened–physically, mentally, and socially while living in joint families. Possibility of more autonomy and independency may be enjoyed in nuclear family.

Type and ownership of house: The burden of depression among women staying in semi-pucca or kuchha house and residing in rented house was high in bivariate analysis [Table/Fig-2]; obvious reason being–these women are usually of poor socioeconomic condition with little or no hope of betterment, which itself is a risk factor for depression.

Age at marriage: Depression was significantly less in women married between 21-23 years and it was high in women married before 18 years [Table/Fig-2]. In Indian social context, this age-group is usually said to be appropriate age of marriage for girls, as at this age they are mature enough to handle the family responsibility but not old enough so as not being able to adjust in the new surroundings. Our findings are consistent with those published by Uecker JF [28]. Shabbir S et al., also observed that the females who got married in early age have high score on depression [29].

Number of conceptions and total living children: The odds of developing depression more in women who had never conceived [Table/Fig-2]; as these women may feel lonely and insecure because in Indian culture children are considered to strengthen the marriage relationship in a positive way.

Bivariate analysis in [Table/Fig-2] showed that women with more than two living children were more depressed. This is understandable as children are dependents and more children means more money and energy needed for them to be raised. A study done by Akram B and Khuwaja F in Pakistan showed that the children number plays a significant role in development of depression [21].

Male and female children: The odds of presence of depression was more in women who had any number of male children [Table/Fig-2]. The reason behind this apparently ironic finding may be the increased stress for providing the male children so that each can grow successful, and also, in some families, due to added wish for atleast one girl child in the family. In spite of best search no original articles were found to support these findings and arguments.

No significant relation was observed between the number of female children and presence of depression in women [Table/Fig-2].

Substance abuse in family: Substance abuse in some form was present in 14.5% of the families and the odds for presence of depression in the homemakers was 4.5 times which was statistically significant [Table/Fig-2]. The substance abuser was mainly the husband, only in four cases substance abuse was also reported in other family members. This finding is omnipresent in similar researches [25,30,31]. Prevalence of mental, behavioural problems like, violence and physical morbidities, are more in substance users than in general population. These families also suffer from economic glitches. Women dependent on their husbands can compound the helplessness and psychological stress, thus contributing eventually to depression.

Perceived Economic Stability: In the present study, around one-third women were disturbed by the economic condition of their family, and this was significant risk factor for presence of depression [Table/Fig-2]. Independent studies and a review have found a close relationship between economic problems and poor mental well-being [32-34], although Diener E et al., found no or weak association [35].

Family Relations: In multivariate analysis, depression was observed to be significantly higher in women with disturbed relation with husband [Table/Fig-2]. Studies had found that symptoms of depression in women were best predicted by low level affection exchange with husband [36,37]. In Indian society, where after marriage maternal family of the women becomes distant, husband is the only psychological and social support, troubled relation with the husbands with added taunts from relatives is obvious reason of depression.

Reasons related to children: Around one-third of the study participants were worried about the education of their children–mainly due to the finances involved in higher education or because their children did not pay sufficient attention towards their studies; also one-fifth of them were concerned about their future i.e., job, marriage of girl child, earning livelihood issues. Burden of depression was significantly higher among them [Table/Fig-2]. Empirical research on the role of issues related with children and depression in homemakers is scant.

Self-image: In the present study, significantly higher odds of presence of depression in women with perceived distorted self-image were appreciated. Women felt that due to being less educated they were usually not thought to be competent enough to take part in important decisions of the family. Some (4.9%) were depressed for being not able to work and be independent/financially support their families [Table/Fig-2]. Also, most housewives felt that their work is not appreciated or recognised by other family members and their contribution is almost always taken for granted. Similar findings have been seen in other studies [18,20,22,38].

Difficulty in doing daily activities: More than half (54.5%) of the ladies with severe depression found it very difficult and 27.3% found it extremely difficult to carry out their daily routine work. Women screened for moderate depression were also observed to be facing the similar difficulty [Table/Fig-3]. It is obvious that in depression the person might face impairment in functioning in different domains of life. This is also one of the diagnostic criteria for depression according to DSM-5 [39].

Suicidal Ideation: In our study, suicidal ideas increased directly with the increase in severity of depression and it was statistically significant [Table/Fig-4]. Attempted suicide and death ideas were more common among those with major depressive disorder according to Atay IM et al., [40]. Asgard U, found a high prevalence of minor depressive disorders in suicides among Swedish women [41]. Depressive episode was seen as significant clinical condition in people attempting suicide in a systematic review done by Ahmed HU et al., [42].

Limitation

Prevalence of depression was based on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall bias and cultural factors. Another limitation is that being a cross-sectional study, no cause effect relationship could be determined.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that a relatively high number of homemakers residing in urban areas of Haldwani block are having clinically significant depression. Age, education, living conditions, marital factors and number of living children were associated with depression in this population. All these factors except age, are modifiable and should be targeted through multiple mechanisms. Also, we recommend integration of mental health care with general health care along with routine screening of all ever married women at urban health facilities for depressive symptoms. Other studies for establishing cause-effect relationship are also needed.

* Pucca: all structure built with bricks and concrete**Kuchha/Semipucca: walls and/or roof and/or floor-not made of concretePearson Chi-sqaure=315.063, df=12, p-value<0.001Pearson Chi-sqaure=193.821, df=4, p-value<0.001

References

[1]Kessler RC, Ormel J, Petukhova M, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Russo LJ, Development of lifetime comorbidity in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 68(1):90-100.10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.18021199968  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]WHO. Mental Health: A Call for Action by World Health Ministers. World Health Organization 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/advocacy/en/Call_for_Action_MoH_Intro.pdf (accessed 20.06.17)  [Google Scholar]

[3]Rihmer Z, Angst A, Mood disorders: Epidemiology. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, editors Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry 2004 8th edBaltimoreLippincott Williams and Wilkins  [Google Scholar]

[4]Travasso SM, Rajaraman D, Heymann SJ, A qualitative study of factors affecting mental health amongst low-income working mothers in Bangalore, India BMC Womens Health 2014 14:2210.1186/1472-6874-14-2224502531  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Sharma I, Pathak A, Women mental health in India Indian J Psychiatry [serial online] 2015 57(Suppl S2):201-4.Available from: http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/text.asp?2015/57/6/201/161478 (accessed 20.06.17)10.4103/0019-5545.16147826330635  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Benazon NR, Coyne JC, Living with a depressed spouse J Fam Psychol 2000 14(1):71-79.10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.7010740683  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Sills MR, Shetterly S, Xu S, Magid D, Kempe A, Association between parental depression and children’s health care use Pediatrics 2007 119:e829-36.10.1542/peds.2006-239917403826  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Blas E, Kurup AS, Equity, social determinants, and public health programmes. [Internet] 2010 Geneva, SwitzerlandWHO Press, World Health OrganisationAvailable from: http://www.who.int/sdhconference/reis/EquitySDandPH_eng.pdf (assessed 13.06.17)  [Google Scholar]

[9]Zhang J, McKeown RE, Hussey JR, Thompson SJ, Woods JR, Gender differences in risk factors for attempted suicide among young adults: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Ann Epidemiol 2005 15:167-74.10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.07.09515652723  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Linzer M, Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Hahn S, Brody D, Gender, quality of life, and mental disorders in primary care: results from the PRIMEMD 1000 study Am J Med 1996 101:526-33.10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00275-6  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[11]Roca M, Gili M, GarciaGarcia M, Salva J, Vives M, Garcia Campayo J, Prevalence and comorbidity of common mental disorders in primary care J Affect Disord 2009 119:52-8.10.1016/j.jad.2009.03.01419361865  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Mitchell AJ, Vaze A, Rao S, Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a metanalysis Lancet 2009 374:609-19.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60879-5  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[13]Bell RA, Franks P, Duberstein PR, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Fernandez y Garcia E, Suffering in silence: reasons for not disclosing depression in primary care Ann Fam Med 2011 9:439-46.10.1370/afm.127721911763  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[14]Lijin A, Prevalence and correlates of depression among ever–married women in a coastal panchayat of rural Thiruvananthapuram Thesis 2016 http://dspace.sctimst.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2127/3/MPH_6156.pdf (assessed 13.09.16)  [Google Scholar]

[15]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure J Gen Intern Med 2001 16(9):606-13.10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x11556941  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[16]Huang FY, Chung H, Kroenke K, Delucchi KL, Spitzer RL, Using the Patient Health Questionnaire9 to measure depression among racially and ethnically diverse primary care patients J Gen Intern Med 2006 21(6):547-52.10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00409.x16808734   [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[17]Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP, Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the 57 World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys JAMA 2004 291:2581-90.10.1001/jama.291.21.258115173149  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Poongothai S, Pradeepa R, Ganesan A, Mohan V, Prevalence of depression in a large urban south indian population—The Chennai urban rural epidemiology study (Cures–70) PLOS ONE 2009 4(9):e7185Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007185 (assessed 14.01.17)10.1371/journal.pone.000718519784380  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Gururaj G, Varghese M, Benegal V, Rao GN, Pathak K, Singh LK, et al. National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015-16: Summary. Bengaluru, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, NIMHANS Publication No. 128, 2016. Available at: http://www.nimhans.ac.in/national-mental-health-survey-2015-16 (assessed 14.01.17)  [Google Scholar]

[20]Raza L, Ali TM, Hasnain A, Dietary practices and severity of depression. Comparative study among housewives and working women in Karachi J Pak Med Assoc 2017 67(6):869-72.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Akram B, Khuwaja F, A Study on depression among working and non-working women of Gujrat, Pakistan European Academic Research 2014 1(10):2948-62.Available at: http://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/217.pdf (assessed 21.03.17)  [Google Scholar]

[22]Fahey N, Soni A, Allison J, Vankar J, Prabhakaran A, Tiffany A, Education mitigates the relationship of stress and mental disorders among rural Indian women Ann Glob Health 2016 82(5):779-87.10.1016/j.aogh.2016.04.00128283129  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Kim JH, Park EC, Lee SG, The impact of age differences in couples on depressive symptoms: evidence from the Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006–2012) BMC Psychiatry 2015 15:1010.1186/s12888-015-0388-y25651908  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Mirza I, Jenkins R, Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: a systematic review BMJ 2004 328(7443):79410.1136/bmj.328.7443.79415070634  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Noori R, Jafari F, Moazen B, Khoddami Vishteh HR, Farhoudian A, Narenjiha H, Evaluation of anxiety and depression among female spouses of Iranian male drug dependents Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2015 4(1):e2162410.5812/ijhrba.2162425861583  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Nandi DN, Banerjee G, Boral GC, Ganguli H, Ajmany S, Ghosh A, Socioeconomic status and prevalence of mental disorders in certain rural communities in India Acta Psych Scand 1979 59:276-93.10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb06967.x433627  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Sethi BB, Sharma M, Depressive disorders and family constellation Indian J Psychiatry 1980 22:69-73.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Uecker JE, Marriage and mental health among young adults J Health Soc Behav 2012 53(1):67-83.10.1177/002214651141920622328171  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Shabbir S, Nisar SR, Fatima S, Depression, anxiety, stress and life satisfaction among early and late married females European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 2015 4(8):128-31.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Ariyasinghe D, Abeysinghe R, Siriwardhana P, Dassanayake T, Prevalence of major depressive disorder among spouses of men who use alcohol in a rural community in central Sri Lanka. Alcohol 2015 50(3):328-32.10.1093/alcalc/agu10525589089  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Dawson DA, Grant BF, Chou SP, Stinson FS, The impact of partner alcohol problems on women’s physical and mental health J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2007 68:66-75.10.15288/jsad.2007.68.6617149519  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Dooley D, Catalano R, Money and mental disorder: toward behavioral cost accounting for primary prevention Am J Community Psychol 1977 5(2):217-27.10.1007/BF00903205888793  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Pearlin LI, The sociological study of stress J Health Soc Behav 1989 30(3):241-56.10.2307/21369562674272  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Patel V, Kleinman A, Poverty and common mental disorders in developing countries Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003 81(8):609-15.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL, Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychol Bull 1999 125(2):27610.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[36]Srivastava A, Kumar R, Social support and mental ill health among older housewives Journal of Indian Health Psychology 2009 4(1):45-55.Available at: http://globalvisionpub.com/globaljournalmanager/pdf/1378530969.pdf. [Accessed 25th June, 2017]  [Google Scholar]

[37]Whisman MA, Marital distress and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders in a population-based national survey J Abnorm Psychol 2007 116(3):638-43.10.1037/0021-843X.116.3.63817696721  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[38]Soomro N, Bibi R, Latif M, Kamran B, Ahmed SI, Differences in level of self-esteem of housewives and working women Med Chan 2013 19(3):48-50.  [Google Scholar]

[39]Akiskal HA, Mood Disorder: Clinical Feature chapter 139th EditionEditors: Sadock, BJ; Sadock VA; Ruiz, Pedro, Copyright 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  [Google Scholar]

[40]Atay IM, Eren I, Gündogar D, The prevalence of death ideation and attempted suicide and the associated risk factors in Isparta, Turkey Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2012 23(2):89-98.  [Google Scholar]

[41]Asgard U, A psychiatric study of suicide among urban Swedish women Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990 82:115-24.10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01367.x2239354  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[42]Ahmed HU, Hossain MD, Aftab A, Soron TR, Alam MT, Chowdhury MW, Uddin A, Suicide and depression in the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region: A systematic review WHO South-East Asia J Public Health [serial online] 2017 6:60-6.Available from: http://www.who-seajph.org/text.asp?2017/6/1/60/206167. [Accessed 06 July, 2017]10.4103/2224-3151.20616728597861  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]