JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Biochemistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2018/26475.11089
Year : 2018 | Month : Jan | Volume : 12 | Issue : 01 Full Version Page : BE01 - BE07

Natural Killer Cells: An Insight into its Role in Pregnancy

Shailaza Shrestha1, Preeti Sharma2, Pradeep Kumar3, SP Saxena4, Rachna Sharma5

1 PhD Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Santosh University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Santosh University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Santosh University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4 Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Ataria, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
5 Lecturer, Department of Biochemistry, TSM Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Preeti Sharma, Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Santosh Medical College and Hospital, Santosh University, Ghaziabad-201009, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: prcdri2003@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Tight regulation of immunotolerance at fetomaternal interface facilitates the survival of allogeneic embryo. Natural Killer (NK) cells are immune cells capable of lysing the target cells via the release of cytolytic granules containing perforin, granzyme and granulysin. Besides the peripheral circulation, NK cells are also present in the uterine mucosa. In contrast to peripheral NK (pNK) cells, uterine NK (uNK) cells are not the killer cells, rather they provide a suitable microenvironment in the pregnant uterus making it compatible to the growing foetus and promoting normal placentation, vascular remodeling and trophoblast infiltration, all of which are essential for healthy pregnancy. Although, uNK cells are loaded with cytolytic factors which can lyse the trophoblasts if activated, the control mechanisms mediated by balance between activating and inhibitory receptors block the cytolytic function of these uNK cells. Intensive research has elucidated the roles of NK cells in normal and abnormal pregnancy outcomes, such as recurrent spontaneous abortion. Much of the facts are still to be unraveled to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and to introduce newer and potential treatment modalities to support healthy pregnancy.

Keywords

Introduction

NK cells that originate from haematopoietic stem cells [1] and account for 10% of blood lymphocytes [2] are the subsets with CD16 and CD56 receptors on their surface [3]. CD16 causes activation of NK cells and mediates Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) by binding with Fc region of immunoglobulin (Ig) G while CD56 is a Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM) that is involved in homotypic adhesion [4]. Based on the cell expression level of CD56, NK cells can be classified as CD56dim type (account for 90%) with higher CD16 and CD56bright cell type (involves 10%) with lower or absence of CD16 [5]. CD56dim cell types are more cytotoxic while CD56bright cells secrete immunoregulatory cytokines [6]. In bone marrow, NK cells develop from haematopoietic stem cells residing in the CD34+ cellular compartment and undergo five phases of maturation namely:

Phase I: Cells develop as CD34+CD117-CD94- subtype [7]

Phase II: Cells become responsive to the effect of IL-15 [8], IL-7 [9] and IL-21 [10] which are required for NK cell proliferation.

Phase III: Loss of CD34+ expression [11].

Phase IV: Differentiation into CD56bright subtype and production of interferon γ [11].

Phase V: Differentiation into CD56dim subtype and expression of CD16 [12].

All these phases are maintained by stromal cell factor, ligand for tyrosine kinases and cytokines [13].

Receptors and Mode of Action

The functions of NK cells are regulated by a controlled action between inhibitory and activating receptors. Major activating receptors include Natural Cytotoxic Receptors (NCRs) (NKp30, NKp44, NKp46), NKG2D, NKp80, CD16, CD69 [14] while chief inhibitory receptors are C-type lectin receptors and Killer Immuno globulin-like Receptors (KIRs) [15]. KIRs recognise Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-A, HLA-B and HLA-C while CD94/NKG2 (Natural killer group 2) members recognise HLA-E expressed on target cells [16]. Domination of inhibitory signals by activating signals causes target cell lysis [17].

The cells that lack Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)-I protein or express stress induced protein are the target of NK cells [18]. However, sometimes cells with MHC-I are also lysed via activating receptors mediated recognition of ligands induced by stress [19]. Various mechanisms explaining the direct action of NK cells on their targets have been postulated, which are given below:

Release of cytotoxic granules (containing perforins and granzymes) that cause apoptosis in target cells [20].

FasL (Fas Ligand) or TRAIL (Tumour necrosis factor related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand) mediated cells lysis [20].

Secretion of cytokines (like Interferons (IFNs), Interleukin (IL)-2, and IL-12) which inhibit tumour angiogenesis [21]

Antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity [22].

NK cells can also indirectly act on cellular targets by inducing dendritic cells that enhance cytolytic responses specific to antigens, as they are capable of crossing specific antigens derived from NK cell dependent cell lysis to the T-cells [23].

NK Cells in Pregnancy

Pregnancy, a unique and highly regulated physiological process between two living systems, mother and the foetus, whose success depends on a number of factors like maternal immune tolerance, hormone and cytokine balance, angiogenesis, genetic, epigenetic and environmental effects [24]. Abnormal outcomes of pregnancy are due to the impairment of these regulating factors causing adaptation failure [25]. It was a matter of conundrum for the researches that, how the foetus carrying allogeneic proteins from parental genes escaped maternal immunity and rejection. To understand the underlying reasons several mechanisms that regulated maternal immune recognition and expression of foetal antigens were proposed, the failure of which could result in loss of pregnancy [26].

NK cells, the large granular lymphocytes, are also present in uterine mucosa and are termed as uNK cells. During pregnancy, they populate the uterus densely and have the immunosurveillance role thereby protecting the mother and foetus from pathogens [3].

Though the origin of uNK cells is unclear, different possible sources have been postulated. They might have been developed from utero-resistant CD34+ stem cells [27] or from the immature progenitors that migrated from circulation to the uterine mucosa [28], where their survival is progesterone [29] or IL-15 dependent [30].

uNK cells are the most dominant immune cells in uterine mucosa and account for almost 30% of stromal cells in late secretory phase of endometrium [31]. At the preovulatory phase, only a small number of NK cells are found in endometrium [32] followed by drastic increase in secretory phase of reproductive cycle, due to increase in progesterone level and reaches to a peak if implantation occurs [29], accounting for about 70% of the lymphocytes in the endometrium [33]. Progesterone is required for the survival of uNK cells, thus decrease in its level by the end of reproductive cycle cause uNK cells to undergo death [34].

pNK cell vs uNK cells

pNK cells are CD56dimCD16+ type whereas uNK cells are CD56bright CD16- type [35]. There is a misconception that uNK cells and pNK cells are same, but it is important to know that these two types of cells are phenotypically as well as functionally different, thus they should be considered as a separate subset of lymphoid cells [36]. Both stimulating and inhibiting receptors mediating NK cell activities are quite different between these two subsets. uNK cells express CD56 and KIRs but are devoid of CD16 or CD57 [37]. The uNK cells are important for trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling [38] whereas pNK cells are cytotoxic in nature and their increased levels are associated with pregnancy failure [39]. Other striking difference observed is in the level of granularity. Though uNK cell are poorly cytotoxic, but still express much higher amount of cytolytic granules enriched with perforins, granzymes and granulysin in comparison to pNK cells [14].

pNK in Pregnancy

Hormones regulating pNK cells activities include prolactin, estrogen and progesterone [24]. The pNK cells show decreased lytic function [40] with the increase of inhibitory receptors expression during the first week of gestation, followed by reaching to maximum level till the third month and to basal level at the end of gestation [41]. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have shown inhibitory effect of estrogens and progesterone on NK cell cytotoxicity either by suppression of NK output from bone marrow or by suppressing NK cellular cytotoxicity individually [24]. Prolactin, at normal concentration, induces proliferation of pNK and its response to IL-2 but it suppresses the response of pNK to IL-2 at higher levels [42].

uNK Cells in Pregnancy

In pregnancy uNK cells concentrate at the site where placenta lies in close vicinity to the infiltrating trophoblasts [43] particularly around spiral arteries and basement membrane [44], thus regulating maternal immune response against foetal allograft and trophoblast growth [24]. The uNK cells also regulates placentation [45], pattern and depth of trophoblast invasion [46].

Though the exact function of uNK cells is not known completely, their location indicates them to be involved in foetal implantation [31], vascular remodelling and trophoblast invasion [47]. The uNK cells secrete growth factors required for switching the endometrium from menstruation to decidualisation during pregnancy [48]. Recently, NK cells receptors for trophoblast MHC-I proteins have been discovered which has opened a new door for the study of uNK cells function [36]. However, in absence of pregnancy, uNK cells undergo apoptosis [24] playing an important role in breakdown of endometrium and causing menstruation [49].

Vascular Remodeling and Angiogenesis

After implantation, it is essential to ensure sufficient supply of nutrients and oxygen to growing foetus [46]. The uNK cells along with trophoblasts [50] promote transformation of endometrial vessels and spiral artery into wide and low resistance canals allowing adequate supply of blood and nutrients from mother to foetus [25]. Initially, there is loosening of media [51], which after implantation is destroyed and replaced by Endovascular Trophoblasts (EVTs) [52]. During this process several angiogenic factors are secreted by uNK cells that affected vascular stability as well as function [53]. Soares MJ et al., demonstrated hypoxia and delay in spiral artery transformation in uNK cells depletion [54]. Major angiogenic factors produced are Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C (VEFG-C), IL-8, placental growth factors, IP10 and angiopoietins [55]. These factors also maintain non-cytotoxic phenotype of uNK cells [56].

Trophoblast Invasion

It is a complex process accompanied by a series of changes in uterine mucosa, collectively known as decidualisation, which includes glandular and stromal element differentiation, increase in spiral artery tortuosity etc [57]. Trophoblast, the foetal cells directly in contact with uterus, are trophectoderm derived cells surrounding blastocysts providing shelter to the foetus inside the cocoon [58]. For normal pregnancy, maternal decidua must be invaded physiologically by trophoblasts so as to promote the adequate oxygen supply for the development of feto-placental unit [59]. Trophoblast invasion is regulated by a number of factors secreted by uNK cells. In vitro studies have reported that IL-15 stimulates the process while TNF-α and INF-γ have the inhibitory roles [60].

The uNK cells via its wide range of receptors can respond to signals which are either induced due to hormonal changes during pregnancy or expressed by trophoblasts [46]. The intimate contact of maternal immune system with trophoblasts causes encroachment of epithelial boundaries by allogeneic cells [46]. Cytotrophoblast in villi, that is in contact with maternal circulation in intervillous space lack HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DP, HLA-DQ and HLA-DR [3] but the deeply infiltrating EVTs express characteristic MHC proteins e.g, HLA-E, HLA-G [61] and HLA-C [62], that transits signals to immune cell of mother, causing either activation of inhibition of uNK cells depending upon the functional role of maternal KIRs. The number of uNK cells that express KIRs specific to HLA-C1 and HLA-C2 increases in early pregnancy [43].

Depending upon the interaction between HLA-C and KIR, the amount of cytokine produced by uNK cells vary, that in turn affect the trophoblast invasion [63]. Inappropriate trophoblast invasion is one of the major causes for early pregnancy loss [64].

Cytokine Production

According to earlier reports, NK cells are capable of producing Type 1 and Type 2 (major) cytokines [65]. Type 1 category mediated cellular immunity and thus was regarded detrimental for maintaining normal pregnancy while Type 2 evoked humoral immunity which was shown to have a protective role for the foetus [66], suggesting the dominance of Type 2 cytokines over Type 1 during pregnancy [66]. Examples of Type 1 cytokines include IL-2, IL-12, INF-γ, and TNF-β whereas those of Type 2 cytokines are IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL 10 and IL-13 [67]. These cause migration of cytotrophoblasts to decidua basalis via interactions with CXC Chemokine Receptor (CXCR) 1 and 2 receptors on trophoblasts [63] thereby favouring vascular remodelling required for placental development and normal pregnancy [68].

Immunomodulation

Foetal protection from maternal immune system is essential for successful pregnancy outcome [69]. Gene expression analysis in human uNK cells have shown overexpression of immunomodulators such as Glycodelin A, Galectin-1 [70] and Tim-3 [71]. Glycodelin A, also called placental protein 14 or progesterone associated endometrial protein [72], causes inhibition of T-cell activation [73]. Glycodelin appears after Luteinizing Hormone (LH) surge but is absent in proliferative endometrium [74]. It is selectively expressed in uNK cells and is involved in local immunosuppression at fetomaternal interface [70]. Galectin-1 suppresses T-cell proliferation and survival, decreases TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-2 production from T-cell and IL-12 from infected macrophages [75]. Uterine hormones also mediate the action of uNK cells by acting on intermediary cells like T lymphocytes (promotes Th2 environment in uterus) and stromal cells of endometrium [76]. The uNK cells also express high amount of Tim 3 which is further increased in activation [77]. According to Gleason MK et al., Tim-3 acts as a coreceptor and promotes production of INF-γ by NK cells [78]. In a study of Sun J et al., it was reported that Tim-3 suppresses cytotoxicity of NK cells via Galectin-9 dependent pathway. As degranulation is the preliminary requirement of NK cells toxicity, Tim-3 causes suppression of NK cells degranulation and thus reduced level of Tim-3 can be linked with abnormal pregnancy or may be regarded as marker of abortion risks in early pregnancy [79]. Li YH et al., reported Tim-3 positive uNK cells in human miscarriages [80] while Miko E et al., demonstrated decreased Tim-3 in the patients with pre-eclampsia [71].

Antigenic Cross Link Between Fetomaternal System/ Cytolytic Action of uNK Cells

Foetal tissue acts as a dynamic organ with the capability of presenting antigens, producing immunomodulators, expressing toll-like receptors that detect internal and external signals to activate maternal immunity and secretion of an array of proteases [81]. The foetus is targeted by maternal uNK cells only if the maternal immune system recognises it as a foreign body [44]. Generally, uNK cells are in contact with trophoblasts of the placenta only but not with embryo. The pNK cells target virus infected cells or tumours by release of cytotoxic granules (perforins, granzymes and granulysin) forming the synapse between the killer cell and the target cells [41]. In contrast to pNK, uNK cells though possessing complete killing machinery for destroying the trophoblast, show non-cytotoxic cross link with the target [82].

CD69, which acts as an earlier marker of NK cells activation [83], not only mediates NK cell dependent cytotoxicity but also causes NK cell proliferation, TNF-α production and expression of activation antigens [84]. In vitro studies have shown that, CD69 activated NK cells can lyse trophoblasts, thereby increasing the risk of miscarriage and failure of in vitro fertilisation procedure [85]. Studies conducted in vitro in mouse demonstrated extravillous cytotrophoblast apoptosis induced by release of granulysin from the uNK cells, thereby causing spontaneous abortion [86].

Study of Thum MY et al., revealed that women with In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) failure have significantly high levels of CD69 NK cells in blood which suggests that CD69+ NK cells have negative effects on successful implantation [39].

Human body consists of control mechanisms to block the cytotoxic functions of uNK cells. As indicated by a number of studies, the balance between activating and inhibitory NK cells receptors is the major contributing factor [87]. In addition to KIRs, three other inhibitory receptors specific to uNK cells have been reported viz ZB4 (anti fas antibody receptor), LILRB1/ILT2 (Leucocyte immunoglobulin like receptor subfamily 1/ Immunoglobulin like transcript 2) and CD94/NKG2A. ZB4 is expressed by all uNK cells whereas rest are expressed only by a subset of uNK cells [14]. Specific interaction of inhibitory uNK receptors with MHC-Ia or MHC-Ib molecule [88] drastically inhibited cytotoxicity of uNK cells in decidua basalis [89]. Interaction of LILRBI/ILT2 receptors with HLA-G also inhibits uNK cellular cytotoxicity [90]. It is also documented that release of VEGF-C by uNK cells in early pregnancy causes up-regulation of TAP-1 in cytotrophoblasts, thus protecting them from lysis [56].

Effect of uNK Cell on Pathogen Infected Decidual Cell

Decidua can be infected by several pathogens like human cytomegalovirus (hcMV) [91], HIV-1 [92], Toxoplasma [93], Plasmodium falciparum [94], hepatitis virus [92] etc., resulting in spread of infection to foetus from the mother. However, uNK cells provide local immunity protecting the foetus from infection via secretion of local cytokines or chemokines [95].

NK Cells in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL)

Miscarriage occurring for three times consecutively is called RPL and affects about 1%-3% of pregnancies [96]. The uNK cells maintain highly regulated balance between trophoblast invasion and abnormal placentation, as the latter is known to increase the risk of RPL, implantation failure, preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, preterm premature rupture of membrane etc., [97] which are collectively known as Great Obstetrical Syndromes [98].

Role of pNK

For normal and successful pregnancy, there should be T helper cell 1/ T helper cell 2 (Th1)/(Th2) balance. Increased Th1 activity has been linked with RPL while increased Th2 activity is favourable for the progression of pregnancy. Increased pNK cells are associated with increased Th1 activity and movement of cytotoxic cells to uterus resulting in pregnancy loss. On the other hand, decrease in pNK cells is linked with enhanced Th2 activity and decreased cytotoxicity in uterus thereby favouring the progression of pregnancy [99]. However, the mechanism lying behind still remains to be established.

Ntrivalas El etal., showed higher expression of CD69 and decreased expression of CD94/NKG2 inhibitory receptors on NK cell of women with RPL [100]. This suggests that imbalance in expression of CD69 and CD94 in pNK cells in RPL cases may be responsible for their pathology. Besides this, pathogenic changes attributed to altered hormonal regulation of NK cells also affect the pathophysiology and requires additional investigation.

Role of uNK

According to Kitaya K et al., [101], in women with RPL, there is increase in the number of CD56dim CD16+ subtype while CD56bright CD16- subtype decreases. As CD16 causes ADCC, the NK cells positive for CD16+ show greater lytic activity than CD16- cells, indicating the increased number of CD16+ NK cells in women with RPL to be the plausible reason for pregnancy loss. Further, CD56brightCD16- NK cells produce hormones essential for placental growth and a decrease of which can develop an unfavourable environment for the growing foetus causing pregnancy failure [23]. However, further larger studies are required to support these findings. A screening of role of uNK cells on RPL has indicated several possible observations as follows:

uNK cell responsible for pathophysiology of RPL may be different than uNK required for successful pregnancy, which is attributed to Th1/Th2 cytokine imbalance.

uNK cells that are normally present on endometrium may not be involved in pathogenesis of RPL, rather pNK cells which are normally absent in endometrium could be the real culprits.

Defective production of IL-4 and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by decidual T-cells.

Decreased production of glycodelin that results in uterine flushing [24].

uNK cells testing and therapeutic approach in RPL

The uNK cells can be tested by endometrial biopsy but drawback is that it can be tested in the pregnancy period only. In most of the studies uNK cells are analyzed immunohistochemically. Though this method is more appropriate to locate the NK cells, it is more time consuming in comparison to flow cytometry. In flow cytometry, there is requirement of large volume endometrial samples due to higher chances of cellular and antigen loss caused by tissue digestion and the process may be difficult in some women from whom such large volumes of samples cannot be obtained [102]. Various therapeutic regimens for RPL has been developed including heparin, human chorionic Gonadotropin (hcG), progesterone, prednisone, aspirin, Intravenous Immunoglobulin (Iv Ig) and leukocyte immunization. Interestingly only heparin and progesterone have been shown to significantly affect the NK cells function. Heparin suppressed cytotoxicity of NK cells and inhibited binding of INF-γ to cell surface [24] while progesterone inhibited release of cytokines from TH cells and decreased the embryo toxicity [103]. However use of heparin as well as aspirin is controversial in thrombophilia and requires further evidences.

Farghali MM et al., recently used conventional G-banding techniques to analyze chromosome of the monolayer cell culture obtained from abortous specimen. In this process immunohistochemical staining was carried out with monoclonal antibody specific to CD56, CD16 uNK cells [104]. Another therapeutic approach that has been developed recently is the use of Synthetic Peri-Implantation Factor (SPIF). PIF is secreted by embryo and is required for the implantation and the trophoblast invasion. Roussev RG et al., in their study involving 107 women with RPL and 26 women with IVF, used SPIFs as drugs for treatment. They found that SPIFs decreased NK cells toxicity by suppressing the expression of NKCD69 suggesting it to be effective, safe and non toxic therapy for RPL [105].

Recently, trials have been carried out to correlate uNK cell numbers with successful implantation during the luteal phase [106]. But the major problem encountered was the large variability of uNK cells during menstruation cycle, followed by rapid surge after ovulation, which was mediated by progesterone induced activation of IL-15 in the stromal cells [107]. Therefore any alteration in hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis will produce changes in uterine mucosa along with NK cell proliferation [108].

A summary of different studies involving analysis of pNK and uNK cells with the therapeutic approach to RPL and their controversial outcomes are given in [Table/Fig-1,2].

Studies analysing pNK and uNK cells.

S. No.StudyNumber of subjectsAnalysis techniqueCellsInclusion criteriaOutcome
1Yamada H et al., (2003)113Flow cytome try, Cr release assaypNKPatients with ≥ 2 miscarr iagesHigher percentage of NK cells in females with miscarriages [109].
2Thum MY et al., (2007)138Flow cytometrypNKPatients subject ed to IVFNo difference was observed in NK cells and its subset percentage among infertile females and those who achieved pregnancy after Assisted Reproduction Technique (ART) [110].
3Matsubayashi H et al., (2005)94Cr release assaypNKPatients subjected to IVFNK levels were high in infertile women who failed to achieve pregnancy and achieved pregnancy after ART [111].
4Baczkowski T and Kurzawa R (2007)58Flow cytometrypNKPatients subjected to IVFDifference could not be obtained with regard to NK cell percentage among infertile females and those who achieved pregnancy after ART [112].
5Katano K et al., (2013)552Endom etrial biopsypNKPatients with 2-6 miscarr iagespNK cells are independent risk factors for miscarriages. Thus, pNK activity should not be measured in RPL as its clinical significance is still to be elucidated [113].
6Ledee Bataille N et al., (2004)15Immuno histo chemistryuNKMore than 3 IVF failuresNo difference in NK cell count among infertile women who failed to achieve pregnancy and those who achieved pregnancy after ART [114].
7Liu B et al., (2014)84 (RPL) 72 (IVF Failure)Histolog ical datinguNKRPLLess developed endometrium in women with miscarriages and uNK cell count in combination with histological dating has higher prognostic value [115].
8Tuckermen E et al., (2007)87Immnun ohisto chemistryuNKPatients with 2-3 miscarri agesSignificant difference in NK cell could not be obtained in females with miscarriages and those who achieved pregnancy after ART [116].
9Seshadri S and Sunkara SK (2014)review of 22 meta-analysis studySearch of electronic databases like medline, embase etc.Review of known primary articles to identify articles not captured in databases.pNK and uNKRPLNo significant difference in uNK cell and pNK cells among fertile and infertile females when percentage rather than absolute count is consideredLive birth rate was not significantly different in patients with high or low levels of NK cells.Further researches required to recommend NK cell analysis as diagnostic tool [117].

Studies analysing various therapeutic approaches for RPL.

S. No.StudyType of studyNumber of subjectsTherapeutic approachOutcome
1Ata B et al., (2011)RCT (randomized control trials)160Predni soneNo complications or adverse foetal outcomes [118].
2Tang AW et al., (2013)Review272Intravenous immunoglo bulinTreatment did not offer benefit to the patients with RPL. As per the authors, unless underlying mechanisms and patient who might gain benefit from iv Ig therapy are not identified, iv Ig for RPL is not recommended [119].
3Wong LF et al., (2014)Review303Intravenous immunoglo bulinNo significant difference among control and patient in terms of live births [120].
4Roussev RG et al., (2013)RCT107SPIFsSPIFs decreased cytotoxicity of uNK cells in females with RPL by suppressing expression of NKCD69 [105].
5Moffett A and Colucci F (2014)Review-Various different therapiesAuthors concluded that use of various therapies for RPL is due to misconception and can lead to serious side effects. So it is not feasible to use such therapies to alter uNK cell activity until known more from larger studies [46].

However, all the therapeutic modalities that has been developed lack reliability and their use as potent therapeutic regimen for females with RPL requires evidences from further large scale studies, therefore more studies in pNK cells and uNK cells involving appropriate inclusion criteria, methodology and test result are needed. Unless clinically sound evaluation and therapeutic modalities are obtained from larger studies, women with reproductive problems must not be subjected to NK cells analysis or immunotherapy as a routine practice. Rather they can be counseled about lack of evidences and encouraged to be part of studies designed to rule out NK cell as a clinical marker for screening so that, it can be safely and effectively used in near future.

Conclusion

Although, uNK cells have cytolytic potential, they show beneficial role in pregnancy by facilitating placental development, angiogenesis and trophoblast invasion. Assuming pNK cells to be similar to uNK cells, it has become a common practice to examine pNK cells in women with infertility and RPL. However, uNK cells and pNK cells being quite different from each other, analysis of pNK cells can rarely give any significant picture of uterine abnormalities. In vitro cytotoxic assays for NK cells may not be relevant to its in vivo functions. Therefore, clinically significant information cannot be gained. It is also unclear whether uNK cells affect earlier implantation stage when blastocysts penetrate the endometrium. There are still some gaps which need to be filled via larger scale studies or genetic studies before researches on uNK cells could be translated to therapies. Though several studies have been shown involvement of uNK cells in successful pregnancy outcomes, the exact underlying mechanism is still a question. This should be elucidated by further investigations, so that it could be helpful in identification of new targets and development of effective therapies for healthy pregnancy.

References

[1]Bellora F, Castriconi R, Dondero A, Carrega P, Mantovani A, Ferlazzo A, Human NK cells and NK receptors Immunol. Lett 2014 161:168-73.10.1016/j.imlet.2013.12.00924361820  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[2]Mandal A, Viswanathan C, Natural killer cells: In health and disease Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2015 8(2):47-55.10.1016/j.hemonc.2014.11.00625571788  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[3]Rodrigues MN, Favaron PO, Dombrowski JG, De Souza RM, Maria Angelica MMA, Role of natural killer (NK) cells during pregnancy: A review Open Journal of Animal Sciences 2013 3(2):138-44.10.4236/ojas.2013.32021  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[4]Caligiuri MA, Human natural killer cells Blood 2008 112(3):461-69.10.1182/blood-2007-09-07743818650461  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[5]Moretta A, Marcenaro E, Parolini S, Ferlazzo G, Moretta L, NK cells at the interface between innate and adaptive immunity Cell Death Differ 2008 15(2):226-33.10.1038/sj.cdd.440217017541426  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[6]Poli A, Michel T, Thérésine M, Andrès E, Hentges F, Zimmer Z, CD56 bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset Immunology 2009 126(4):458-65.10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03027.x19278419  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[7]Freud AG, Caligiuri MA, Human natural killer cell development Immunol Rev 2006 214(1):56-72.10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00451.x17100876  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[8]Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA, Ontogeny and expansion of human natural killer cells: clinical implications Int Rev Immunol 2001 20(3-4):503-36.10.3109/0883018010905441711878513  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[9]Bonanno G, Mariotti A, Procoli A, Corallo M, Scambia G, Pierelli L, Interleukin-21 induces the differentiation of human umbilical cord blood CD34-lineage- cells into pseudomature lytic NK cells BMC Immunol 2009 10(8):4410.1186/1471-2172-10-4619712464  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[10]Michaud A, Dardari R, Charrier E, Cordeiro P, Herblot S, Duval M, IL-7 enhances survival of human CD56 bright NK cells J Immunother 2010 33(4):382-90.10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181cd872d20386468  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[11]Freud AG, Yokohama A, Becknell B, Lee MT, Mao HC, Ferketich AK, Evidence for discrete stages of human natural killer cell differentiation in vivo J Exp Med 2006 203(4):1033-43.10.1084/jem.2005250716606675  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[12]Dahlberg CIM, Sarhan D, Chrobok M, Duru AD, Alici E, Natural killer cell-based therapies targeting cancer: possible strategies to gain and sustain anti-tumor activity Frontiers in Immunol 2015 6(605):01-19.10.3389/fimmu.2015.0060526648934  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[13]Colucci F, Di Santo JP, The receptor tyrosine kinase c-kit provides a critical signal for survival, expansion, and maturation of mouse natural killer cells Blood 2000 5(3):984-91.10.1182/blood.V95.3.984.003k40_984_991  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[14]Vacca P, Moretta L, Moretta A, Mingari MC, Origin, phenotype and function of human natural killer cells in pregnancy Trends Immunol 2011 32(11):517-23.10.1016/j.it.2011.06.01321889405  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[15]Rezvani M, Rouce RH, The application of natural killer cell immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer Frontiers in Immunology 2015 6(578):01-13.10.3389/fimmu.2015.00578  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[16]King A, Allan DS, Bowen M, Powis SJ, Joseph S, Verma S, HLA-E is expressedon trophoblast and interacts with CD94/NKG2 receptors on decidual NK cells Eur J Immunol 2000 30(6):1623-31.10.1002/1521-4141(200006)30:6<1623::AID-IMMU1623>3.0.CO;2-M  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[17]Vivier E, Tomasello E, Baratin M, Walzer T, Ugolini S, Functions of natural killer cells Nat Immunol 2008 9(5):503-10.10.1038/ni158218425107  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[18]Waldhauer I, Steinle A, NK cells and cancer immunosurveillance Oncogene 2008 27(45):5932-43.10.1038/onc.2008.26718836474  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[19]Trapani JA, Davis J, Sutton VR, Smyth MJ, Proapoptotic functions of cytotoxic lymphocyte granule constituents in vitro and in vivo Curr Opin Immunol 2000 12(3):323-29.10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00094-7  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[20]Smith MJ, Hayakawa Y, Takeda K, Yagita H, New aspects of natural killer- cell surveillance and therapy of cancer Nat Rev Cancer 2002 2(11):850-61.10.1038/nrc92812415255  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[21]Street SE, Cretney E, Smyth MJ, Perforin and interferon-gamma activities independently control tumour initiation, growth, and metastasis Blood 2001 97(1):192-97.10.1182/blood.V97.1.19211133760  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[22]Buhtoiarov IN, Neal ZC, Gan J, Buhtoiarova TN, Patankar MS, Gubbels JA, Differential internalization of hu14.18-IL2 immunocytokine by NK and tumor cell: impact on conjugation, cytotoxicity, and targeting J Leukoc Biol 2011 89(4):625-38.10.1189/jlb.071042221248148  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[23]Cheng M, Chen Y, Xiao W, Sun R, Tian T, NK cell-based immunotherapy for malignant diseases Cellular and Mol Immunol 2013 10(3):230-52.10.1038/cmi.2013.1023604045  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[24]Dosiou C, Giudice LC, Natural killer cells in pregnancy and recurrent pregnancy loss: endocrine and immunologic perspectives Endocr Rev 2005 26(1):44-62.10.1210/er.2003-002115689572  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[25]Sharma S, Natural killer cells and regulatory T cells in early pregnancy loss Int J Dev Biol 2014 58(0):219-29.10.1387/ijdb.140109ss25023688  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[26]Larsen EC, Christiansen OB, Kolte AM, Macklon N, New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage BMC Medicine 2013 11(154):01-10.10.1186/1741-7015-11-15423803387  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[27]Keskin DB, Allan DS, Rybalov B, Andzelm MM, Stern JN, Kopcow HD, TGF-beta promotes conversion of CD16+ peripheral bloodNKcells into CD16-NKcells with similarities to decidual NK cells Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007 104(9):3378-83.10.1073/pnas.061109810417360654  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[28]Male V, Hughes T, McClory S, Colucci F, Caligiuri MA, Moffett A, Immature NK cells, capable of producing IL-22, are present in human uterine mucosa J Immunol 2010 185(7):3913-18.10.4049/jimmunol.100163720802153  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[29]Manaster I, Mandelboim O, The unique properties of uterine NK cells Am J Reprod Immunol 2010 63(6):434-44.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00794.x20055791  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[30]Manaster I, Mizrahi S, Wohl DG, Sela HY, Ginossar NS, Lankry D, Endometrial NK cells are special immature cells that await pregnancy J Immunol 2008 181(3):1869-76.10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.186918641324  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[31]Bulmer JN, Lash GE, Human uterine natural killer cells: a reappraisal Mol Immunol 2005 42(4):511-21.10.1016/j.molimm.2004.07.03515607807  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[32]Kalkunte S, Chichester CO, Gotsch F, Sentman CL, Romero R, Sharma S, Evolution of non-cytotoxic uterine natural killer cells Am J Reprod Immunol 2008 59(5):425-32.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00595.x18405313  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[33]Hanna J, Mandelboim O, When killers become helpers Trends Immunol 2007 28(5):201-06.10.1016/j.it.2007.03.00517403615  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[34]Moffett A, Loke C, Immunology of placentation in eutherian mammals Nat Rev Immunol 2006 6(8):584-94.10.1038/nri189716868549  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[35]Yagel S, The developmental role of natural killer cells at the fetal-maternal interface Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009 201(4):344-50.10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.03019788966  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[36]Moffett A, Regan L, Braude P, Natural killer cells, miscarriage, and infertility BMJ 2004 329(7477):1283-85.10.1136/bmj.329.7477.128315564263  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[37]Saito S, Cytokine network at the feto-maternal interface J Reprod Immunol 2000 47(2):87-103.10.1016/S0165-0378(00)00060-7  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[38]Lash GE, Bulmer JN, Do uterine natural killer (uNK) cells contribute to female reproductive disorders? J Reprod immunol 2011 88(2):156-64.10.1016/j.jri.2011.01.00321334072  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[39]Thum MY, Bhaskaran S, Abdalla HI, An increase in the absolute count of CD56dimCD16+CD69+ NK cells in the peripheral blood is associated with a poorer IVF treatment and pregnancy outcome Human Reprod 2004 19(10):2395-400.10.1093/humrep/deh37815319390  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[40]Miyaura H, Iwata M, Direct and indirect inhibition of Th1 development by progesterone and glucocorticoids J Immunol 2002 (3):1087-94.10.4049/jimmunol.168.3.108711801642  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[41]Kopcow HD, Allan DSJ, Chen X, Rybalov B, Andzelm MM, Ge B, Human decidual NK cells form immature activating synapses and are not cytotoxic Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005 102(43):15563-68.10.1073/pnas.050783510216230631  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[42]Sun R, Li AL, Wei HM, Tian ZG, Expression of prolactin receptor and response to prolactin stimulation of human NK cell lines Cell Research 2004 14(1):67-73.10.1038/sj.cr.729020415040892  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[43]Xiong S, Sharkey AM, Kennedy PR, Gardner L, Farrell LE, Chazara O, Maternal uterine NKcell-activating receptor KIR2DS1 enhances placentation J Clin Invest 2013 123(10):4264-72.10.1172/JCI6899124091323  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[44]Moffett A, Shreeve N, First do no harm: uterine natural killer (NK) cells in assisted reproduction Human Reprod 2015 30(7):1519-25.10.1093/humrep/dev09825954039  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[45]Chakraborty D, Rumi MA, Konno T, Soares MJ, Natural killer cells direct hemochorial placentation by regulating hypoxia-inducible factor dependent trophoblast lineage decisions Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011 108(39):16295-300.10.1073/pnas.110947810821900602  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[46]Moffett A, Colucci F, Uterine NK cells: active regulators at the maternal-foetal interface J Clin Invest 2014 124(5):1872-79.10.1172/JCI6810724789879  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[47]King AM, Natural killer cells and pregnancy Nat Rev Immunol 2002 2(9):656-63.10.1038/nri88612209134  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[48]King A, Uterine leukocytes and decidualisation Hum Reprod Update 2000 6(1):28-36.10.1093/humupd/6.1.2810711827  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[49]Trundley A, Moffett A, Human uterine leukocytes and pregnancy Tissue Antigens 2004 63(1):01-12.10.1111/j.1399-0039.2004.00170.x14651517  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[50]Ashkar AA, Santo JP, Croy BA, Interferon gamma contributes to initiation of uterine vascular modification, decidual integrity, and uterine natural killer cell maturation during normal murine pregnancy J Exp Med 2000 192(2):259-70.10.1084/jem.192.2.25910899912  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[51]Robson A, Uterine natural killer cells initiate spiral artery remodelling in human pregnancy FASEB J 2012 26(12):4876-85.10.1096/fj.12-21031022919072  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[52]Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Hanssens M, The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies Placenta 2006 27(9-10):939-58.10.1016/j.placenta.2005.12.00616490251  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[53]Lash GE, Expression of angiogenic growth factors by uterine natural killer cells during early pregnancy J Leuk Biol 2006 80(3):572-80.10.1189/jlb.040625016816146  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[54]Soares MJ, Chakraborty D, Karim Rumi MA, Konno T, Renaud SJ, Rat placentation: an experimental model for investigating the hemochorial maternal-fetal interface Placenta 2012 33(4):233-43.10.1016/j.placenta.2011.11.02622284666  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[55]Vacca P, Mingari MC, Moretta L, Natural killer cells in human pregnancy J Reprod Immunol 2013 97(1):14-19.10.1016/j.jri.2012.10.00823432867  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[56]Kalkunte SS, Mselle TF, Norris WE, Wira CR, Sentman CL, Sharma S, Vascular endothelial growth factor C facilities immune tolerance and endovascular activity of human uterine NK cells at the maternal-foetal interface J Immunol 2009 182(7):4085-92.10.4049/jimmunol.080376919299706  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[57]Ramathal CY, Bagchi IC, Taylor RN, Bagchi MK, Endometrial decidualization: of mice and men Semin Reprod Med 2010 28(1):17-26.10.1055/s-0029-124298920104425  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[58]Carter AM, Mess A, Evolution of the placenta in eutherian mammals Placenta 2007 28(4):259-62.10.1016/j.placenta.2006.04.01016780944  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[59]Quenby S, Uterine natural killer cells, implant- tation failure and recurrent miscarriage Reprod Biomed Online 2006 13(1):24-28.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62012-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[60]Arcuri F, Cintorino M, Carducci A, Human decidual natural killer cells are a i and target of macrophage migration inhibitory factor Reproduction 2006 131(1):175-82.10.1530/rep.1.0085716388020  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[61]Apps R, Gardner L, Moffett A, A critical look at HLA-G Trends Immunol 2008 29(7):313-21.10.1016/j.it.2008.02.01218538632  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[62]Apps R, Murphy SP, Fernando R, Gardner L, Ahad T, Moffett A, Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) expression of primary trophoblast cells and placental cell lines, determined using single antigen beads to characterize allotype specificities of anti- HLA antibodies Immunology 2009 127(1):26-39.10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03019.x19368562  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[63]Hanna J, Goldman WD, Hamani Y, Avraham I, Greenfield C, Natanson YS, Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface Nat Med 2006 12(9):1065-74.10.1038/nm145216892062  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[64]Zhang J, Chen Z, Smith GN, Croy BA, Natural killer cell-triggered vascular transformation: Maternal care before birth? Cellular and Mol Immunol 2011 8(1):01-11.10.1038/cmi.2010.3820711229  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[65]Bouman A, Moes H, Meineman MJ, De Leij L, Faas MM, Cytokine production by NK-lymphocytes in follicular and luteal phase of the ovarian cycle in humans Am J Reprod Immunol 2001 45(3):130-34.10.1111/j.8755-8920.2001.450302.x11270636  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[66]Veenstra AL, Nieuwenhoven V, Bouman A, Moes H, Heineman MJ, de-Leij LFMH, Cytokine production in natural killer cellsand lymphocytes in pregnant womencompared with women in the follicularphase of the ovarian cycle Fertility and sterility 2002 77(5):1132-37.10.1016/S0015-0282(02)02976-X  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[67]Clerici M, Fusi ML, Ruzzantes S, Piconi S, Biasin M, Arienti D, Type 1 and type 2 cytokines in HIV infection-A possible role in apoptosis and disease progression Ann of Med 2009 29(3):185-88.10.3109/078538997089993349240622  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[68]Pijnenborg R, Manipulating human reproduction: a retrospective view on Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006 61:149-54.10.1159/00009062716391485  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[69]Seppala M, Koistinen H, Koistinen R, Hautala L, Chiu PC, Yeung WS, Glycodelin in reproductive endocrinology and hormone-related Cancer Eur J Endocrinol 2009 160(2):121-31.10.1530/EJE-08-075619039086  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[70]Koopman LA, Kopcow HD, Rybalov B, Boyson JE, Orange JS, Schatz F, Human decidual natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with immunomodulatory potential J Expt Med 2003 198(8):1201-12.10.1084/jem.2003030514568979  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[71]Miko E, Meggyes M, Bogar B, Schmitz N, Barakonyi A, Varnagy A, Involvement of Galectin-9/ TIM-3 pathway in the systemic inflammatory response in early-onset preeclampsia PloS one 2013 8(8):e7181110.1371/journal.pone.007181123936526  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[72]Logdberg L, Wester L, Immunocalins: a lipocalin subfamily that modulates immune and inflammatory responses Biochim Biophys Acta 2000 1482(1-2):284-97.10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00164-3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[73]Rachmilewitz J, Borovsky Z, Riely GJ, Miller R, Tykocinski ML, Negative regulation of T cell activation by placental protein14 is mediated by the tyrosine phosphatase receptor CD45 J Biol Chem 2003 278(16):14059-65.10.1074/jbc.M21171620012556471  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[74]Seppala M, Taylor RN, Koistinen H, Koistinen R, Milgrom E, Glycodelin: a major lipocalin protein of the reproductive axis with diverse actions in cell recognition and differentiation Endocr Rev 2002 23(4):401-30.10.1210/er.2001-002612202458  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[75]Rabinovich GA, Baum LG, Tinari N, Paganelli R, Natoli C, Liu FT, Galectins and their ligands: amplifiers, silencers or tuners of the inflammatory response? Trends Immunol 2002 23:313-20.10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02232-9  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[76]Kitaya K, Nakayama T, Okubo T, Kuroboshi H, Fushiki S, Honjo H, Expression of macrophage inflammatory protein-1in human endometrium: its role in endometrial recruitment of natural killer cells J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003 88:1809-14.10.1210/jc.2002-02098012679478  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[77]Ndhlovu LC, Lopez VS, Barbour JD, Jones RB, Jha AR, Long BR, Tim-3 marks human natural killer cell maturation and suppresses cell-mediated cytotoxicity Blood 2012 119(16):3734-43.10.1182/blood-2011-11-39295122383801  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[78]Gleason MK, Lenvik TR, McCullar V, Felices M, Brien MS, Cooley SA, Tim-3 is an inducible human natural killer cell receptor that enhances interferon gamma production in response to galectin-9 Blood 2012 119(13):3064-72.10.1182/blood-2011-06-36032122323453  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[79]Sun J, Yang M, Ban Y, Gao W, Song B, Wang Y, Tim-3 Is upregulated in nk cells during early pregnancy and inhibits nk cytotoxicity toward trophoblast in galectin-9 dependent pathway PLoS ONE 2016 11(1):01-13.10.1371/journal.pone.014718626789128  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[80]Li YH, Zhou WH, Tao Y, Wang SC, Jiang YL, Zhang D, The Galectin-9/Tim-3 pathway is involved in the regulation of NK cell function at the maternal-foetal interface in early pregnancy Cellular and Mol Immunol 2016 13(1):73-81.10.1038/cmi.2014.12625578313  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[81]Riley JK, Yokoyama WM, NK cell tolerance and the maternal-foetal interface Am J Reprod Immunol 2008 59(5):371-87.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00593.x18405308  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[82]Co EC, Gormley M, Kapidzic M, Rosen DB, Scott MA, Stolp HA, Maternal decidual macrophages inhibit NK cell killing of invasive cytotrophoblasts during human pregnancy Biol Reprod 2013 88(6):15510.1095/biolreprod.112.09946523553431  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[83]Llera AS, Viedma F, Madrid FS, Tormo J, Crystal structure of the C-type lectin-like domain from the human hematopoietic cell receptor CD69 J Bio Chem 2001 276(10):7312-19.10.1074/jbc.M00857320011036086  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[84]Pisegna S, Zingoni A, Pirozzi G, Cinque B, Cifone MG, Morrone S, A Src-dependent sky activation controls CD69-mediated signaling and function on human NK cells J Immunol 2002 169(1):68-74.10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.6812077230  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[85]Yoo JH, Kim JK, Han AR, Peripheral blood NK cell cytotoxicities are negatively correlated with CD8+ T cells in fertile women but not in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss Am J Reprod Immunol 2012 68(1):38-46.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01133.x22537159  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[86]Lima PDA, Paffaro VA Jr, Yamada AT, Functional duality of mouse uterine natural killer cell in pregnancy. In: Chaouat G, Sandra O, Ledee N, editors Immunol of Pregnancy 2013 SharjahBentham Science Publishers:335-58.10.2174/9781608057337113010017  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[87]Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, Lanier LL, Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells Science 2011 331(6013):44-49.10.1126/science.119868721212348  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[88]Bouteiller P, MHC antigen expression/function at the embryonic interface. Part A: major histocompatibility complex class I unique expression in human trophoblast: facts, questions and controversies. In: Chaouat G, Sandra O, Ledee N editors Immunol of Pregnancy 2013 SharjahBentham Science Publishers:158-73.10.2174/9781608057337113010010  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[89]Ei CH, Casemayou A, Aguerre GM, Rabot M, Berrebi A, Parant O, Critical and differential roles of NKp46 and NKp30 activating receptors expressed by uterine NK cells in early pregnancy J Immunol 2008 181(5):3009-17.10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.300918713971  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[90]Favier B, Lemaoult J, Lesport E, Carosella ED, ILT2/HLA-G interaction impairs NK cell functions through the inhibition of the late but not the early events of the NK cell activating synapse FASEBJ 2010 24(3):689-99.10.1096/fj.09-13519419841038  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[91]Erlebacher A, Immunology of the maternal-fetal interface Annu Rev Immunol 2013 31(1):387-411.10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-10000323298207  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[92]Marlin R, Nugeyre MT, Duriez M, Cannou C, LeBreton A, Berkane N, Decidual soluble factors participate in the control of HIV-1 infection at the materno-fetal interface Retrovirology 2011 8(58):01-12.10.1186/1742-4690-8-5821767373  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[93]Lux X, Zhao M, Yang Y, Han M, Xu X, Jiyang Y, Toxoplasma gondii infection of decidual CD1c+ dendritic cells enhance cytotoxicity of decidual natural killer cells Inflammation 2014 7(4):1261-70.10.1007/s10753-014-9853-x24573986  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[94]Sartelet H, Schleiermacher D, Le-Hesran JY, Graesslin O, Gaillard D, Fe M, Less HLA-G expression in Plasmodium falciparum infected third trimester placentasis associated with more natural killer cells Placenta 2005 26(6):505-11.10.1016/j.placenta.2004.08.00615950065  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[95]Siewiera J, El Costa H, Tabiasco J, Berrebi A, Cartron G, LeBouteiller P, Human cytomegalo virus infection elicits new decidual natural killer cell effector function PLoS Pathog 2013 9(4):01-17.10.1371/journal.ppat.100325723592985  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[96]Nakashimaa A, Shiozakia A, Myojo S, Ito M, Tatematsu M, Sakai M, Granulysin produced by uterine natural killer cells induces apoptosis of extravillous trophoblasts in spontaneous abortion Am J Pathol 2008 173(3):653-64.10.2353/ajpath.2008.07116918688023  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[97]Le Bouteiller P, Tabiasco J, Killers become builders during pregnancy Nat Med 2006 12(9):991-92.10.1038/nm0906-99116960566  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[98]Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R, The great obstetrical syndromes are associated with disorders of deep placentation Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 204(3):193-201.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.00921094932  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[99]Diejomaoh MF, Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage is still a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic quagmire Med Princ Pract 2015 24(1):38-55.10.1159/00036597325428171  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[100]Ntrivalas EI, Kwak-Kim JY, Gilman SA, Chung BH, Ng SC, Beaman KD, Status of peripheral blood natural killer cells in women with recurrent spontaneousabortions and infertility of unknown aetiology Hum Reprod 2001 16(5):855-61.10.1093/humrep/16.5.85511331628  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[101]Kitaya K, Yamaguchi T, Yasuo T, Okubo T, Honjo H, Post-ovulatory rise endometrial CD16(–) natural killer cells: in situ proliferation of residual cells or selectiverecruitment from circulating peripheral blood? J Reprod Immunol 2007 76(1-2):45-53.10.1016/j.jri.2007.03.01017499365  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[102]Tang AW, Alfirevic Z, Quenby S, Natural killer cells and pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent miscarriage and infertility: a systematic review Human Reprod 2011 26(8):1971-80.10.1093/humrep/der16421613313  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[103]Choi BC, Polgar K, Xiao L, Hill JA, Progesterone inhibits in-vitro embryotoxic Th1 cytokine production to trophoblast in women with recurrent pregnancy loss Hum Reprod 2000 15(1):46-59.10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_1.4610928418  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[104]Farghali MM, El-kholy ALG, Swidan KH, Rashed AAR, El-Sobky E, Goma MF, Relation between uterine natural killer cells and unexplained recurrent miscarriage Acta Medica International 2016 3(1):78-82.10.5530/ami.2016.1.17  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]

[105]Roussev RG, Donskoi BV, Stamatkin C, Ramu S, Chernyshov VP, Coulam CB, Preimplantation factor inhibits circulating natural killer cell cytotoxicity and reduces CD69 expression: implications for recurrent pregnancy loss therapy Reprod Biomed Online 2013 26(1):79-87.10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.01723186554  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[106]Kuroda K, Venkatakrishnan R, James S, Sucurovic S, Mulac-Jericevic B, Lucas ES, Elevated peri-implantation uterine natural killer cell density in human endometrium is associated with impaired corticosteroid signalling in decidualizing stromal cells J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013 98(11):4429-37.10.1210/jc.2013-197724025400  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[107]Wilkens J, Male V, Ghazal P, Forster T, Gibson DA, Williams AR, Uterine NK cells regulate endometrial bleeding in women and are suppressed by the progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil J Immunol 2013 191(5):2226-35.10.4049/jimmunol.130095823913972  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[108]Kosova G, Stephenson MD, Lynch VJ, Ober C, Evolutionary forward genomics reveals novel insights into the genes and pathways dysregulated in recurrent early pregnancy loss Hum Reprod 2015 30(3):519-29.10.1093/humrep/deu35525586782  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[109]Yamada H, Morikawa M, Kato EH, Shimada S, Kobashi G, Minakami H, Pre-conceptional natural killer cell activity and percentage as predictors of biochemical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion with normal chromosome karyotype Am J Reprod Immunol 2003 50(4):351-54.10.1034/j.1600-0897.2003.00095.x14672340  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[110]Thum MY, Abdalla HI, Bhaskaran S, Harden EL, Ford B, Sumar N, The relationship of systemic TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma with IVF treatment outcome and peripheral blood NK cells Am J Reprod Immunol 2007 57(3):210-17.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2006.00465.x17295900  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[111]Matsubayashi H, Shida M, Kondo A, Suzuki T, Sugi T, Izumi S, Preconception peripheral natural killer cell activity as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in patients with unexplained infertility Am J Reprod Immunol 2005 53(3):126-31.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00255.x15727566  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[112]Baczkowski T, Kurzawa R, Immunophenotypic profiles of peripheral blood lymphocytes on the day of embryo transfer in women undergoing in vitro fertilization Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2007 45(1):S73-S77.  [Google Scholar]

[113]Katano K, Suzuki S, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N, Kitaori T, Sugiura OM, Peripheral natural killer cell activity as a predictor of recurrent pregnancy loss: A large cohort study Fertil Steril 2013 100(6):1629-34.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.199624012195  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[114]Ledee-Bataille N, Dubanchet S, Kadoch J, Castelo-Branco A, Frydman R, Chaouat G, Controlled natural in vitro fertilization may be an alternative for patients with repeated unexplained implantation failure and a high uterine natural killer cell count Fertil Steril 2004 82(1):234-236.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.12.03015237022  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[115]Liu B, Mariee N, Laird S, Smith J, Li J, Li TC, The prognostic value of uNK cell count and histological dating in the mid-luteal phase of women with reproductive failure Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014 181:171-75.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.01025150956  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[116]Tuckerman E, Laird SM, Prakash A, Li TC, Prognostic value of the measurement of uterine natural killer cells in the endometrium of women with recurrent miscarriage Hum Reprod 2007 22(8):2208-13.10.1093/humrep/dem14117656418  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[117]Seshadri S, Sunkara SK, Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 2014 20(3):429-38.10.1093/humupd/dmt05624285824  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[118]Ata B, Tan SL, Shehata F, Holzer H, Buckett W, A systematic review of intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of unexplained recurrent miscarriage Fertil Steril 2011 95(3):1080-85.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.02121232738  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[119]Tang AW, Alfirevic Z, Turner MA, Drury JA, Small R, Quenby S, A feasibility trial of screening women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage for high uterine natural killer cell density and randomizing to prednisolone or placebo when pregnant Hum Reprod 2013 28(7):1743-52.10.1093/humrep/det11723585559  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]

[120]Wong LF, Porter TF, Scott JR, Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 21(10):CD00011210.1002/14651858.CD000112.pub3  [Google Scholar]  [CrossRef]