JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Genetics Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29397.10932
Year : 2017 | Month : Dec | Volume : 11 | Issue : 12 Full Version Page : GC01 - GC05

VCAM-1(rs3783605A>G) Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping in a Sample of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Iraqi Patients

Nadia Fadhil Salman1, Asmaa M Salih Almohaidi2, Ahmed Kadhim Mohammed3, Dhurgham Hameed Hasan4

1 PhD Student, Department of Biology, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Al Gazalia, Iraq.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Biology, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Al Gazalia, Iraq.
3 Specialist DNA Analyst, Department of Serology, Medico-Legal Directorate, Baghdad, Iraq.
4 Specialist DNA Analyst, Department of Paternity and Kinship, Medico-Legal Directorate, Baghdad, Iraq.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Nadia Fadhil Salman, Um Salama Street-665/6/28, Baghdad, Al Gazalia, Iraq.
E-mail: nadia83fadhil@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

The Vascular Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) is a cell surface glycoprotein expressed by cytokine-activated endothelium, mediates the adhesion of monocytes and lymphocytes. Diabetes mellitus is a common global health problem represented by metabolic disorder in which common genetic variants interact with environmental factors like older age, obesity, family history of diabetes to unmask the disease which might be a result of inflammation reflecting response.

Aim

Detection of the VCAM-1(rs3783605 A>G) gene polymorphism in a group of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Iraqi patients.

Materials and Methods

The study enrolled 129 subjects (68 patients, 61 controls). Clinical features and laboratory investigations included: Body Mass Index, Abdominal Circumference, fasting blood sugar, Glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile were measured for each subject. Genotyping of the VCAM-1(rs3783605 A>G) gene polymorphism was performed using Sequence Specific Primer (SSP) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique and the PCR product was visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Results

The clinical characteristics showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in the patients group compared to the control group. VCAM-1polymorphism analysis showed a higher frequency of A/G genotype in control group than patients group (100% versus 88.2%), while the analysis of the allele impact, including the genotypes that contain the G allele showed no significant association in patient group compared with control.

Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that control group had a higher frequency of the A/G genotype regarding the patients group, and that the G allele of the VCAM-1 (rs3783605 A>G) single nucleotide polymorphism has more role in the pathogenesis of T2DM than the A allele, and could be considered as a risk factor for T2DM in Iraqi population, as well as the association of the A/G genotype with the incidence of T2DM in Iraqi patients.

Keywords

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that is characterized by high blood glucose levels for prolonged period of time, which might be associated with long term damage and failure of many body organs; like eyes, kidneys, heart and nerves [1,2].

Millions of people are affected with diabetes mellitus over world, making it a famous global health problem [3]. There are two well-known types of diabetes mellitus: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), which occur mostly among children and young people and considered to be an autoimmune disease, while T2DM (T2DM) is a multifactorial disease that is closely related with life style and obesity [2].

Various pathophysiological factors were related to the development of macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with T2DM, suggesting that T2DM may be the result of an inflammation that reflects innate and acquired immunity responses [4,5]. Circulating inflammatory markers such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP), soluble Vascular Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and Intracellular Adhesion Molecule (ICAM-1) are found in high serum levels in patients with T2DM [6,7] which may support the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.

VCAM-1 (CD106) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily; it is expressed by vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, tissue macrophages, chondrocytes, dendritic cells, and epithelial cells of the thymus and pericytes of neural tissue [8]. Its main ligand is the integrin a4β1 (very late antigen 4) VLA-4, and it is expressed by endothelial cells as a result of inflammatory stimuli [9]. Interactions between VCAM-1and activated receptors on the leukocytes cause a tight adhesion and transmigration of leukocytes into the basement membrane of the vasculature. Platelets, leukocytes, and endothelial cells that depend on adhesion molecules link the processes of haemostasis, thrombosis, and inflammation [10].

VCAM-1 gene is positioned at the 1st chromosome on the locus 1p31-32 [11], and it is the target gene of ETS transcription factors (E26 transformation-specific transcription elements) which includes ETS2 and some cytokines as TNF-α that induce VCAM-1 expression by the activation of ETS2 [12]. Several polymorphisms were identified in the promoter region of the VCAM-1 gene that affects its expression levels and many of these polymorphisms were suggested to be associated within range of inflammatory diseases [13-16].

The aim of this study was to examine the genotype of VCAM-1 gene polymorphisms (rs3783605 A>G) and its association with T2DM in Iraqi patients.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective case control study was conducted on 129 Iraqi subjects, 68 patients (42 males and 26 female) that were diagnosed with T2DM, who were periodic patients at the Specialize Center of Endocrinology and Diabetes /Baghdad, from March 2016 to June 2016. The patients had been instructed about the purpose of the study and interested volunteers have been enrolled along with 61 healthy subjects (31 males and 30 female) that were taken as a control group. Diabetic patients were selected according to the World Health Organization 2016 guideline:

Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L), or Glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) [2]. Diabetic patients younger than 18-year-old, those with less than six months of follow up, or pregnant women were excluded. Also, subjects with the history of Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Endocrinopathy or those taking any lipid altering medication were excluded from the study, while control group consisted of non-diabetic healthy individuals according to the laboratory finding of FBS value <90 mg/dL.

Venous blood samples (7 mL) were divided into two aliquots; one for biochemical tests and the other for DNA genotyping. Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), Glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) and Lipid profile {Total cholesterol, Triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL-C)} were measured by enzymatic colorimetric methods with commercially available kits (Human, Germany and SPINREACT Company, USA). Body mass index weight/height (kg/m2) and abdominal Circumference (cm) were calculated for both groups.

The genotypes were characterized using sequence specific primer (SSP) technique. Genomic DNA was extracted using gSYNC DNA Extraction Kit (Geneaid Biotech-Taiwan), the amplification of rs3783605VCAM1SNP was done by designing sequence specific primers using PRIMER3PLUS software, the two forward primers were different only with the targeted allele (forward 1 for c.-540 A allele and forward2 for c.-540G allele) and a common reverse primer was used with both forward primers to obtain a PCR product size of 490 bp [Table/Fig-1].

VCAM-1 promoter region primers.

Forward primer 1 5’-ATC TCT TTT AGA ATT GCA AAC ATA-3’
Forward primer 2 5’-ATC TCT TTT AGA ATT GCA AAC GTA-3’
Reverse primer 5’-GGA GGG TAT TCA GCT CCT-3’

Lyophilized primers were supplied by Alpha DNA (Canada) and were suspended according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR reaction was performed using Go Taq® green master mix (2X) of Promega (USA) instructions for a final volume of 50 μL (two tubes for each sample: one for forward primer 1 and the second for forward primer 2, the common reverse primer was added to each tube), as following: 25 μL of 2X Go Taq® green master mix, 1.5 μL of 10M of each primer (forward and reverse), 3 μL of genomic DNA and the volume was completed to 50 μL with nuclease free water, positive and negative controls were made with each run. Reaction was carried out with Gene Amp® PCR System 9700 thermocycler with denaturation for 3 minute at 95°C; followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 minute, 54°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute. Final extension was carried out at 72°C for 20 min. The PCR product (490 bp fragment) was visualized by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (stained by 2.5 μL ethidium bromide).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 20.00 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical significance of differences between the means for normally distributed variables (FBS, HbA1c-, HDL, LDL, VLDL, TG as well as BMI and the Abdominal Circumference) was assessed using student’s t-test. The Odds Ratio (OR) was used for the frequency distributions of the selected variables. WINPEPI computer programs (version 11.63) was used to calculate the statistical significance of the ODD Ratio (OR) that was assessed by a special χ2 formula, as well as the p-values that was calculated with Fisher’s-exact test [17].

Results

Clinical Features

The tests result for both patients and control group are listed in [Table/Fig-2].

Clinical characteristics of patients and control group.

ParameterControl(Mean±SE)Patient(Mean±SE)
Age (year)37.5±1.148.6±1.2
Gender (male/female)31/3042/26
Disease duration (year)08.2
BMI (kg/m2)27.8±0.529.2±0.6*
Abdominal Circumference (cm)88.2±1.399.4±2.2*
FBS (mg/dL)88.5±10.3239.7±1.3*
HbA1c (%)4.9±0.279.1±0.03*
Cholesterol (mg/dL)189.5±5.7222.6±3.3*
Triglyceride (mg/dL)117.1±13.8201.7±7.6*
HDL (mg/dL)37.4±0.640.4±0.5*
LDL (mg/dL)129.5±5.6150.4±2.8*
VLDL (mg/dL)23.4±1.538±1.5*

*p-value calculated by students t-test comparing the means of the variables for the two groups (p≤ 0.05 is significant)


These results showed significant differences in biochemical tests (FBS- Fasting blood sugar, HbA1c- Glycohemoglobin, HDL- high density lipoproteins, LDL-low density lipoproteins, VLDL- very low density lipoproteins, TG- triglycerides) as well as Body Mass Index (BMI) and the Abdominal Circumference in patients group compared with control group.

DNA Genotyping results

The PCR product of the amplified VCAM-1 (rs3783605) SNP have been presented in [Table/Fig-3].

The electrophoresis of amplified VCAM-1rs3783605 SNP on the 2% agarose gel. M: 100bp DNA ladder. F1: amplified fragment by F1 primer. F2: amplified fragment by F2 primer, (PCR product 490bp).

VCAM-1 polymorphism analysis showed a higher frequency of A/G genotype in control group than patients group {100% vs. 88.2%}, that showed statistical significance (p=0.007), while the analysis of the allele impact, including both genotypes that contain G allele showed no significant association in patient group compared with control (p=0.383). The attributable fraction in exposed subjects was 21.1% and the attributable fraction in population was 11.8% [Table/Fig-4].

Genotypes and alleles frequency of the VCAM1 rs3783605 A>G polymorphism.

Group GenotypesStudy groupsComparisonOddsRatioCI 95%p-valueFisher –test
PatientControl
A/A0 (0)0 (0)G/G vs. A/G1.641.64 to infinity0.007*
A/G60 (88.2%)61(100%)
G/G8 (11.67%)0 (0)
Alleles
A allele 2n (%)60 (44.1%)61(50%)G vs. A1.270.75- 2.130.383
G allele2n (%)76 (55.9%)61 (50%)

p-values calculated with Fisher’s-exact test. p ≤ 0.05 (* for significant)


The [Table/Fig-5] shows significant differences (p≤ 0.05) between the patients and control in all tested clinical features (BMI, FBS, HbA1c, HDL, LDL, VLDL, TG and Abdominal Circumference) according to the genotype results, as well as a significant difference between A/G genotype patients group and the G/G genotype patients group (p≤ 0.05) in all clinical tests results. As noticed from the present data, healthier individuals own just the A/G genotypes.

Comparison of the clinical features according to the genotypes.

Characters(Mean±SE)GroupGenotype
A/AA/GG/G
BMI (kg/m2)Patients029±0.5*31.1±1.5**
Control027.8±0.60
Abdominal Circumference (cm)Patients099±2.2*102.6±1.3**
Control088.2±1.30
FBS (mg/dL)Patients0293.8±11.2*293±26.3**
Control088.5±1.20
HbA1c (%)Patients09.2±0.3*7.6±0.5**
Control04.9±0.030
Cholesterol (mg/dL)Patients0226.5±6.2*194.1±12.6**
Control0190.3±3.30
Triglyceride (mg/dL)Patients0202.3±11.3*197.1±33.2**
Control0117.2±80
HDL (mg/dL)Patients040.5±0.5*39.3±2.3**
Control037.4±0.50
LDL (mg/dL)Patients0150.4±5.4*117.8±15.2**
Control0129.5±30
VLDL (mg/dL)Patients038.1±1.5*36.4±5.01**
Control023.5±1.50

-p-value calculated by t-test comparing the means of the variables for the two groups (p≤ 0.05 is significant).

* significant differences between patients and controls;

** significant differences between patient’s genotype groups.


Discussion

T2DM is associated with; first: abnormal carbohydrate, lipid and protein metabolism, second with insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion [2]. In this case-control study, clinical features of the patients showed elevated levels of fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-C and VLDL (with significant differences p<0.05) compared with controls. Previous studies mentioned that both male and female diabetic patients have elevated levels of FBS, HbA1c, and lipid profile [18-21], these studies in addition to the current study results suggest the use of FBS, HbA1c, and lipid profile tests for T2DM diagnosis confirmation and they might be helpful in risk assessment of coronary heart disease in T2DM patients. The HbA1c test was suggested to be useful for screening diabetic patient for risk of cardiovascular complications and for intervention with lipid lowering drugs [22], which is compatible with the results of another study which mentioned that HbA1c can be helpful as a suggested biomarker for predicting dyslipidemia in diabetic patients [23].

The present study showed a significant increase in Body Mass Index (BMI) and the abdominal circumference (p<0.05) in the patient group compared to control group. These results agree with other studies that found a strong and independent association between BMI and the risk of being diagnosed with T2DM [24]. Another study found that people, who have BMI close to 30 kg /m2 or more, are more likely to have diabetes or shorter life time due to diabetes [25]. Furthermore, abdominal circumference provides a good indicator of body fat distribution, which might be used to identify patients with increased risk of obesity-related cardio-metabolic disease [26]. Measurement of the abdominal circumference could be used as a screening method for predicting and assessing T2DM [27]. All the patients in this study were diagnosed by specialist physicians; their elevated tests results indicated that high FBS and HbAIc levels might be the reason for the increase in their lipid profile, this goes with the finding of a previous study [23]. So FBS, HbA1c, BMI and abdominal circumferences could be used as an indicator for complications (including elevated levels of lipid profile) in Iraqi patients with T2DM.

VCAM-1 is expressed by vascular endothelial cells under the influence of inflammatory stimuli [4]. The up-regulation of adhesion molecule expression appears to be involved in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. The promoters of VCAM-1 gene include binding motifs for some transcription factors as ETS2, and many other agents that up-regulate VCAM-1 expression, while the suppression of VCAM-1 expression is caused by many agents that inhibit these transcription factors activity [8], this may explain the influence of the DNA variations in the promoter region of the VCAM-1 gene with the susceptibility of certain diseases.

The present study investigated the genotype of VCAM-1 promoter gene polymorphism (rs3783605 A>G) SNP in a sample of T2DM Iraqi patients. Statistical analysis results showed that the G/G genotype has a significant association with T2DM in the patient group as well as higher frequency of the G allele, while control group had a higher frequency of the A/G genotype regarding the patient group. In addition, there was a significant elevation in the clinical tests results for the A/G patient group (p≤ 0.05) associated with the incidence of T2DM, these results go with the findings of the previous studies which indicated that G allele has more role in the pathogenesis of certain diseases than A allele [13,28]. The rs3783605 A>G SNP the G allele is more frequent even though it is a derived allele compared with the ancestral A allele. This finding agrees with the suggestion that risky alleles are mostly derived, low-frequency (i.e., minor) variants [29,30], At the same time the present finding is consistent with other studies which demonstrated that rare derived alleles have a higher proportion of risk variants compared to ancestral allele [31,32]. In most cases, late-onset diseases are caused by neutral mutations, which may replace ancestral alleles completely, leading to a situation in which the protective allele is the ancestral (rare) one and the risk allele is the derived (common) one [30].

Multiple VCAM-1 gene polymorphisms (including rs3783605 A>G) were studied by Idelman G et al., who found a multiple uncommon variants of the VCAM-1 promoters, prevalent in African Americans that are biologically active and could influence disease progression. The ETS2 transcription factors were found to be bound more significantly at the variant c.-540G allele than the common c.-540A allele, confirming an increased role for ETS2 in the regulation of the (rs3783605 A>G) VCAM-1 promoter variant [28]. These findings were consistent with previous studies and indicated that the VCAM-1 function is implicated in a variety of diseases that have disproportionately higher frequencies of G allele in African Americans, including thromboembolic diseases [33,34].

The effect of rs3783605 A>G SNP on the activity of the VCAM-1promoter in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) was investigated by Pakdel FD et al., who found that the HUVECs which were transfected by the G allele showed about 2-fold higher transcriptional activity compared with the A allele, this finding indicates that the rs3783605 A>G may affect the DNA binding of ETS2 separately or DNA binding of ETS2-transcription factors in combinational forms. A synergistic repression or activation of gene expression occurs as well as interaction affinity between these transcription factors, which might affect VCAM-1 gene expression and it has an important role in the pathogenesis of VCAM-1 associated diseases and tumour metastases [13]. These former results agree with our finding that T2DM Iraqi patients have a higher frequency of G allele and significant association with the G/G genotype.

The genetic contribution to T2DM susceptibility is well accepted in previous studies [3,35]. DNA variations can have a major impact on how humans respond to diseases, environmental insults, drugs, and other therapies. This makes SNP analysis of great importance for biomedical research and for developing pharmaceutical industry or medical diagnostics; it can also help identify multiple genes associated with complex diseases such as cancer and diabetes [36]. Many SNPs in different genes were studied and found to be associated with the occurrence and development of T2DM [37-39], which support our finding that VCAM-1 promoter variation might have an effect in increasing the incidence of diabetes.

There are many good points that give strength to this study. To the best of our knowledge this study is the first population based study that investigated the VCAM-1 gene promoter (rs3783605 A>G) SNP in Iraqi patients with T2DM, all the Iraqi participants were from the Arab race and had similar genetic backgrounds, which minimized the potential confounding due to ethnicity.

Limitation

Because of the time limit and the precarious security situation the study was conducted on a small size sample of population, a further limitation of the study is that only one polymorphism was examined, the positive association was found only in group. Also, due to the relatively small sample size, the frequencies of some homozygous variants were low or absent.

Conclusion

It was concluded that G allele at the VCAM-1 gene promoter (rs3783605 A>G) SNP could be considered as risk factors and it has more role in the pathogenesis of T2DM, while the A allele might have a protective effect; also there was an association for the A/G genotype with all clinical parameters in T2DM patients. These results shed a light on the importance of the clinical factors in avoidance of diabetes, which might motivate people to improve their lifestyle into a healthier way leading to reduce their chances in developing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Further studies are needed with larger sample size to determine the role of VCAM-1 SNPs in diabetes occurrence and complication; this could be helpful for better understanding of the genetic-environmental interactions and would assist in designing optimal measures for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of this disease.

References

[1]WHO. Global Gudelines for type 2 diabetes. Glob Guidel Type 2 Diabetes [Internet]. 2012;2-4. Available from: www.idf.org  [Google Scholar]

[2]World Health Organisation. WHO Diabetes Country Profiles: Pakistan. 2016;(April):1-8. Available from: http://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/  [Google Scholar]

[3]Singh S, The genetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review J Sci Res Baranas Hindu Univ Varanasi 2011 55:35-48.http://www.bhu.ac.in/journal/Issues/JournalofScientifcResearchVol55/4.%20Sunita-Review_Diabetes.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[4]Bahl VK, Seth S, Management of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus Indian Hear J 2001 53(2):147-54.Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11428468  [Google Scholar]

[5]Abdul Wadood S, Al Shawk R, Baher H, Intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular adhesion molecule-1, interlukin 1-β, and c - reactive protein levels in iraqi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014 13(4):55-62.Available from: http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol13-issue4/Version-4/J013445562.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[6]Hu FB, Meigs JB, Li TY, Rifai N, Manson JE, Inflammatory markers and risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women Diabetes 2004 53(3):693-700.Available from: http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/53/3/693.abstract  [Google Scholar]

[7]Hasnawi AY, Almohaidy AMS, Yaser LA, Polymorphisms of E-selectin gene in the Arab Iraqi patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Diyala Journal for Pure Science 2017 13(2):122-37.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Carter RA, Wicks IP, Vascular Cell adhesion molecule 1 (cd106) a multifaceted regulator of joint inflammation Arthritis Rheum 2001 44(5):985-94.Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1529-0131(200105)44:5%3C985::AID-ANR176%3E3.0.CO;2-P/abstract  [Google Scholar]

[9]Fotis L, Giannakopoulos D, Stamogiannou L, Xatzipsalti M, Intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 and vascular celladhesion molecule-1 in children. Do they play a role in the progression of atherosclerosis? Hormones 2012 11(2):140-46.Available from: http://www.hormones.gr/779/article/intercellular-cell-adhesion-molecule-1-andvascular%E2%80%A6.html  [Google Scholar]

[10]Inwald D, Demystified: Adhesion molecule deficiencies Mol Pathol 2001 54(1):1-7.Available from: http://mp.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/mp.54.1.1  [Google Scholar]

[11]Kim I, Moon S-O, Hoon Kim S, Jin Kim H, Soon Koh Y, Young Koh G, Vascular endothelial growth factor expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (icam-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (vcam-1), and e-selectin through nuclear factor- b activation in endothelial cells J Biol Chem 2001 276(10):7614-20.Available from: http://www.jbc.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/jbc.M009705200  [Google Scholar]

[12]Cheng C, Tempel D, Den Dekker WK, Haasdijk R, Chrifi I, Bos FL, Ets2 determines the inflammatory state of endothelial cells in advanced atherosclerotic lesions Circ Res 2011 109(4):382-95.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Pakdel FD, Keramatipour M, Noorbakhsh F, Talebi S VM, Investigating the Effect of rs3783605 Single-nucleotide Polymorphism on the Activity of VCAM-1 promoter in human umbilical vein endohelial cells Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015 14(2):179-87.Available from: http://ijaai.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijaai/article/view/396  [Google Scholar]

[14]Navarro-Hernández RE, Oregon-Romero E, Vázquez-Del Mercado M, Rangel-Villalobos H, Palafox-Sánchez CA, Muñoz-Valle JF, Expression of ICAM1 and VCAM1 serum levels in rheumatoid arthritis clinical activity. Association with genetic polymorphisms Dis Markers 2009 26(3):119-26.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3833410/  [Google Scholar]

[15]Kłoda K, Domanski L, Pawlik A, Kurzawski M, Safranow K, Ciechanowski K, Effect of the ICAM1 and VCAM1 gene polymorphisms on delayed graft function and acute kidney allograft rejection Ann Transplant 2010 15(4):15-20.Available from: http://ijaai.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijaai/article/view/396  [Google Scholar]

[16]Domanski L, Kołda K, Pawlik A, Wisniewska M, Kwiatkowska E, Kurzawski M, Correlation between ICAM1 and VCAM1 gene polymorphisms and histopathological changes in kidney allograft biopsies Arch Med Sci 2013 9(2):276-82.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3648810/  [Google Scholar]

[17]Abramson JH, WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2011 8(1):1Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3041648&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract  [Google Scholar]

[18]Rashid A, Haider I, Correlation of serum lipid profile with glycemic control in type 2 diabetics JPMI 2009 23(3):231-35.Available from: http://www.jpmi.org.pk/index.php/jpmi/article/view/257  [Google Scholar]

[19]Patil M, Kumar N, Nusrath A, Jayaram S, Rajeshwari A, Association of HbA1c with serum lipid profile and lipoprotein A in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus IJCRR 2014 6(6):20-25.Available from: http://www.ejmanager.com/mnstemps/45/45-1394960265.pdf?t=1411976280  [Google Scholar]

[20]Pavithra V, Revathy K, Swaminathan S, Association between Uric acid and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus in comparison with controls Int J Curr Microbiol. App Sci 2016 5(4):585-89.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.504.066  [Google Scholar]

[21]Sheikhpour R, Sadeghian F, Pourhosseini F, Rajabi S, Correlation between glycated haemoglobin, serum glucose and serum lipid levels in type 2 diabetes Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Obesity 2013 5(1):12-15.Available from: http://ijdo.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-121-en.htm  [Google Scholar]

[22]Meenu J, Jadeja Jayendrasinh M, Meeta N, Correlation between hba1c values and lipid profile in type 2 diabetes mellitus IJBAP 2013 2(1):47-50.Available from: http://ijbap.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/1/4/13145127/9final_ijbap_2013_-_copy.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[23]Singh G, Kumar AK, A Study of lipid profile in type 2 diabetic Punjabi population J Exerc Sci Physiother 2012 8(1):7-10.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Ganz ML, Wintfeld N, Li Q, Alas V, Langer J, Hammer M, The association of body mass index with the risk of type 2 diabetes: a case–control study nested in an electronic health records system in the United States Diabetol Metab Syndr 2014 6(1):50Available from: http://dmsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1758-5996-6-50  [Google Scholar]

[25]Narayan KM, Boyle J, Thompson T, Gregg EW, Williamson D, Effect of BMI on lifetime risk for diabetes in the US Diabetes Care 2007 30(6):1562-66.Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/30/6/1562.long  [Google Scholar]

[26]Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk. a consensus statement from shaping america’s health: association for weight management and obesity prevention; NAASO, The Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association Am J Clin Nutr 2007 May 85(5):1197-202.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Ghosh JR, Bandyopadhyay AR, Abdominal circumference as a screening measure for Type 2 Diabetes Kathmandu Univ Med J 2012 10(40):12-15.Available from: http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/KUMJ/article/view/10987/8906  [Google Scholar]

[28]Idelman G, Taylor JG, Tongbai R, Chen RA, Haggerty CM, Bilke S, Functional profiling of uncommon VCAM1 promoter polymorphisms prevalent in African American populations Hum Mutat 2007 28:824-29.  [Google Scholar]

[29]Gorlova OY, Ying J, Amos CI, Spitz MR, Peng B, Gorlov IP, Ancestral Alleles As Risk-Associated Variants in common human diseases J Bioinform Comput Biol 2012 10(2):1241008  [Google Scholar]

[30]Lachance J, Disease-associated alleles in genome-wide association studies are enriched for derived low frequency alleles relative to HapMap and neutral expectations BMC Med Genomics 2010 3(1):57Available from: http://bmcmedgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1755-8794-3-57  [Google Scholar]

[31]Fredman D, Sawyer SL, Strömqvist L, Mottagui-Tabar S, Kidd KK, Wahlestedt C, Nonsynonymous SNPs: Validation characteristics, derived allele frequency patterns, and suggestive evidence for natural selection Hum Mutat 2006 27(2):173-86.Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16835861%5Cnhttp://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157258  [Google Scholar]

[32]Shastry BS, SNPs in disease gene mapping, medicinal drug development and evolution J Hum Genet 2007 52(11):871-80.Available from: https://www.nature.com/jhg/journal/v52/n11/pdf/jhg2007117a.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[33]Taylor JG, Tang DC, Savage SA, Leitman SF, Heller SI, Serjeant GR, Variants in the VCAM1 gene and risk for symptomatic stroke in sickle cell disease Blood 2002 100:4303-09.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Hoppe C, Klitz W, Cheng S, Apple R, Steiner L, Robles L, Gene interactions and stroke risk in children with sickle cell anemia Blood 2004 103(6):2391-96.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Busch CP, Hegela RA, Genetic determinants of type 2 diabetes mellitus Clin Genet 2001 60(4):243-54.Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600401.x  [Google Scholar]

[36]Shih-Chieh Su, Jay Kuo C-C, Ting Chen, Single nucleotide polymorphism data analysis - State-of-the-art review on this emerging field from a signal processing viewpoint IEEE Signal Process Mag 2007 24(1):75-82.Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4049915/  [Google Scholar]

[37]Tsuchiya T, Schwarz PEH, Bosque-Plata L del, Geoffrey Hayes M, Dina C, Froguel P, Association of the calpain-10 gene with type 2 diabetes in Europeans: Results of pooled and meta-analyses Mol Genet Metab 2006 89(1-2):174-84.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Yoshiuchi I, Two SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity at melanocortin-4 receptor gene loci exhibited high FST values and natural selection J Diabetes Metab 2012 Available from: http://www.omicsonline.org/two-snps-associated-with-type-2-diabetes-and-obesity-at-melanocortin-4-recepto-gene-loci-2155-6156.S11-005.php?aid=17071  [Google Scholar]

[39]Yao M, Wu Y, Fang Q, Sun L, Li T, Qiao H, Association of ADIPOQ variants with type 2 diabetes mellitus susceptibility in ethnic Han Chinese from northeast China J Diabetes Investig 2016 7(6):853-59.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5089947/  [Google Scholar]