JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28713.10855
Year : 2017 | Month : Nov | Volume : 11 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : QC12 - QC16

NT-proBNP: A Biochemical Marker of Maternal Complications in Pre-eclampsia

Supriya Kumari1, Mamta Gupta2, Harsh Vardhan3, Vandana Saini4, SK Gupta5

1 Trainee, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hindu Rao Hospital and NDMC Medical College, New Delhi, India.
2 Senior Consultant and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hindu Rao Hospital and NDMC Medical College, New Delhi, India.
3 Senior Biochemist, Department of Biochemistry, Hindu Rao Hospital and NDMC Medical College, New Delhi, India.
4 Senior Specialist, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hindu Rao Hospital and NDMC Medical College, New Delhi, India.
5 Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Supriya Kumari, C-22, Vikaspuri-110018, New Delhi, India.
E-mail: supriya.oct29@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Elevated serum levels of NT-proBNP (N terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide) are associated with Pre-Eclampsia (PE) and its complications.

Aim

To evaluate NT-proBNP in women with PE and correlate its levels with maternal outcome.

Materials and Methods

A total 90 out of which 45 women with PE (Group A) and 45 normotensive healthy pregnant women with singleton pregnancy (Group B) were enrolled. NT-proBNP was estimated at term or just before induction of labour or in early labour. These women were followed till 48 hours postpartum. Maternal outcome was recorded and analysed using statistical tests like Student t-test, Mann-whitney, ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis, Pearson and Spearman correlation.

Results

Significant elevated serum levels of NT-proBNP were seen in PE women than controls (mean 439.47±431.99 and 99.40±37.89 respectively) (p-value <0.001). Severity and early onset of PE was associated with further increased serum NT-proBNP levels. In Group B none of the women developed any complication whereas, in Group A 19/45 (42.22%) women had a total of 31 complications. Forty percent of these PE women had maternal complications and elevated NT-proBNP levels above 500 pg/mL. Cardiovascular complications were observed in 4/45 women with NT-proBNP levels of 770 pg/mL and above. The positive predictive value for NT-proBNP for detecting complications was 83.33% at a cut-off level of 500 pg/mL. The negative predictive value was 92.85% at a cut-off level of 100 pg/mL. Women in Group A with early onset PE, who did not develop maternal complications, had low serum NT-proBNP. Women without severe features of PE (n=12) in Group A who developed complications, had elevated NT-proBNP (mean 434±307.219 pg/mL) than those who had no complication (mean NT-proBNP 80.66±37.54 pg/mL).

Conclusion

NT-proBNP is a useful marker for predicting maternal complications and risk stratification for optimum maternal outcome in a PE women.

Keywords

Introduction

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy account for approximately 30% of maternal deaths [1]. Most of the adverse maternal outcomes are significantly more common in PE compared to other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertension accounts for 14% of global maternal deaths and is the second most common cause of maternal mortality as per WHO report [2]. However, in developed countries like U.S. the incidence of maternal mortality due to hypertensive diseases is only 7.4% in the year 2011-2013 [3].

Severe PE and early PE account for most of the life threatening maternal complications i.e., eclamptic convulsion, HELLP syndrome, placental abruption, acute cardiovascular complications, pulmonary oedema [4-6]. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate a marker which could predict complications of PE to optimise obstetric care and timely intervention, thereby prevent morbidity and mortality in these women.

Various markers have been studied in PE and found to be raised in pre-eclamptic women ie. Corin [7]. LDH [8], leptin [9], PAPP-A [10], inhibin and activin A [11], cystatin C, beta 2 microglobulin [12], beta-trace protein [12], sFlt-1/PGF ratio [13], BNP and NT-proBNP [14-17]. Their levels have been associated with vascular, renal, cardiac and other pathological changes of PE. Despite these different potential markers for PE, the reliability of these in predicting severity and complications of pregnancy in PE has been inconsistent between different studies.

Pro-BNP is secreted by myocytes as a result of myocardial stretch and is further broken down to active hormone BNP and a biologically inactive product NT-proBNP. It modulates the cardiovascular system by limiting myocardial hypertrophy, causing peripheral vasodilatation and increasing endothelial permeability [18,19] and remains elevated for three to six months postpartum.

NT-proBNP levels are higher in pregnant than non pregnant women as a result of myocardial stretch mediated by volume overload [20,21]. This level is even higher in pregnancy complicated with PE because of increased afterload superimposed over the pre-existing volume overload and reduced metabolic clearance of NT-proBNP due to renal impairment [15]. BNP has a half-life of 20 minutes in contrast to NT-proBNP which has a half-life of one to two hours. Thus, NT-proBNP is a surrogate marker of BNP and has a wider detection rate and better biomarker for predicting mortality, morbidity and hospitalization for cardiac failure, left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease [19].

We therefore, plan to evaluate plasma NT-proBNP levels in pre-eclamptic and normotensive healthy pregnant women and also to find association of plasma NT-proBNP levels with maternal complications in both the groups.

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted from May 2015 to May 2016 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at a tertiary care center, Delhi, India. Approval from Ethical Committee was obtained vide letter No. HRH/2015/2550 dated 29.5.15.

Sample size:

Sample size was calculated on the basis of formula: n=z2P(1-P)/d2

Where z=1.96 for α 0.05 at 95% confidence interval

P=expected proportion in population based on previous study (taken as 0.03) [22]

Prevalence of PE 3% [22]

D=allowable error taken as 0.05 (5%)

Sample size=1.96x1.96x0.03x 0.97/0.052=44.71

A total of 90 women were enrolled comprising of two groups of 45 each; Group A with PE and group B with normotensive pregnancy. Informed written consent was taken from all the participants.

Inclusion Criteria

PE was defined as per ACOG 2013 criteria [23] i.e., SBP ≥140 mmHg and DBP ≥90 mmHg after 20 weeks measured on two occasions four hours apart in a previously normotensive women + proteinuria (≥ 300 mg / 24 hour or protein: creatinine ratio ≥ 0.3 or dipstick 1+ persistent) or in absence of proteinuria and one or more of the following features: 1) Thrombocytopenia (platelets <100,000/μL); or 2) renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.1 mg/dl or doubling of creatinine in absence of renal disease); or 3) Liver involvement (elevated serum transaminase levels twice normal); or 4) Pulmonary oedema; or 5) Cerebral symptoms or visual symptoms.

PE with severe features is defined [23] as any one of the following features- BP 160 /110 mmHg or higher on two occasions four hours apart while the patient is on bed rest (unless antihypertensive treatment is initiated before this time) or thrombocytopenia (platelets <100,000/μL) or impaired liver function (elevated serum transaminase levels twice normal) or renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.1 mg/dl or doubling of creatinine in absence of renal disease) or pulmonary oedema or new onset cerebral or visual disturbances.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with chronic hypertension, renal disease, severe anaemia, diabetes, thyroid disease, autoimmune disease, cardiac disease, multiple pregnancy, placenta previa and patients who did not give consent were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Fasting venous sample was drawn at term or just before induction of labour or in early labour in both the groups. All baseline investigations; CBC, PCV, Liver Function Test (LFT), Kidney Function Test (KFT), PT/INR, LDH, S.Creatinine along with NT-proBNP were estimated. Plasma NT-proBNP measurement was done using Roche CARDIAC proBNP kit using cobas h 232 instrument in heparinized venous blood [24]. It is an immunoassay test using gold-labelled antibodies against NT-proBNP which form a sandwich complex with it, in the blood. The sandwich complexes thus formed gives a visual signal as a red line, the intensity of which is converted to a quantitative result which is read in the display.

Urine albumin was evaluated by dipstick [23]. History, examination findings, results of biochemical investigations, maternal outcome and other associated complications were entered in a predesigned proforma. All patients were followed up for 48 hours post-delivery and any maternal complications i.e., eclampsia or any cardiovascular complication etc., that occured postpartum within 48 hours were also recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0 Unless denoted otherwise, categorical data were described as percentages and continuous data were described as means±SD or median (inter-quartile range). A student’s t-test (for data that was normally distributed) or a Mann Whitney test (for data that was not normally distributed) was applied for comparison and statistical significance. The graphical representation was done using a Box and Whisker plot to show distribution of the values in each of the groups. Association of NT-proBNP with various parameters like parity, period of gestation, systolic and diastolic BP, impending signs and symptoms, PE features was statistically determined by using ANOVA/Kruskal Wallis/Mann whitney test. Correlation of NT-proBNP levels with parameters like age and blood investigations among the two groups was statistically determined using Pearson correlation for data distributed normally and Spearman correlation for data not distributed normally.

Results

Demographic Details

Distribution of women in both the groups with regard to age, parity and period of gestation was comparable in both the groups. Significant lower values were observed in Group A for platelet count. Whereas, the values of serum bilirubin, Serum Glutamate Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT), Serum Glutamic Pyruvate Transaminase (SGPT), serum Lactic Dehydrogenase (LDH), International Normalized Ratio (INR), prothrombin time and serum NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher (p-value<0.05) [Table/Fig-1].

Baseline characteristics of study population.

ParameterGroup AGroup Bp-value
n (%)n (%)
Age in years
<2520 (44.4%)17 (37.8%)0.231
25-3024 (53.3%)23 (51.1%)
>301 (2.2%)5 (11.1%)
Mean±SD25.31±3.3025.91±4.67
Parity Nulliparous26 (57.77%)26 (57.77%)1
Para ≥119 (42.22%)19 (42.22%)
POG weeks
<345 (11.1%)5 (11.1%)1
34-3716 (25.5%)16 (25.5%)
>3724 (53.3%)24 (53.3%)
Blood Parameters
Hb (gm%)10.81±1.5910.4±1.460.212
PCV (%)33.86±4.9433.02±4.430.339
Platelets (lacs/mL)1.91±0.752.23±0.480.026*
T.Bilirubin mg/dL1.03±0.730.79±0.060.027*
SGOT (IU/L)50.38±52.3526.67±6.390.001*
SGPT (IU/L)44.53±41.623.47±5.430.000*
S.Creat. (mg/dL)0.92±0.20.85±0.060.420
LDH (IU/L)361.43±243.61194.38±29.7<0.001*
PT (seconds)14.67±1.213.81±0.37<0.001
INR1.08±0.131.01±0.02<0.001*
NT-proBNP pg/ML
Range60-168260-185<0.001*
Mean439.47±431.9999.40±37.89
Interquartile range68766

*significant POG- period of gestation

p-value calculated by Chi-square test and Student t-test


[Table/Fig-2] shows a box plot, the vertical lines showing the range of the NT-proBNP levels in both the groups. The box depicted on both the vertical lines show the central 50% of the values; between quartile 1 and quartile 3. The horizontal lines represent the mean and median values. (439.47 pg/mL and 212 pg/mL in Group A versus 99.40 pg/mL and 102 pg/mL in Group B respectively). The interquartile range (IQR) is 687 pg/mL in PE women.

Plasma NT- PROBNP levels (pg/mL) in both the groups.

NT-proBNP had a moderate correlation with some basic lab investigations i.e., SGOT, SGPT and serum creatinine and good correlation with serum LDH in our study [Table/Fig-3].

Correlation of NT-proBNP with basic investigations.

BaselineInvestigationPlateletTotal BilirubinSGOTSGPTLDHS.CreatininePTINR
p-value0.7570.9560.0030.0030.0000.0360.9130.998
r-value-0.040.0080.439*0.431*0.685**0.314*-0.0170

** good correlation * moderate correlation

p-value calculated by Mann-Whitney and r-value by Spearman correlation test


The association of NT-proBNP with diastolic BP, severity of PE and eclampsia was statistically significant (p-value 0.012 and 0.03 respectively) [Table/Fig-4]. NT-proBNP was significantly higher and had a negative correlation with early onset PE (p-value 0.027, r value -0.33).

Correlation of various parameters in PE group with NT-proBNP.

S. No.Parameter (PE group)NT-proBNP-valuep-valuer-value
1.Onset of PEEarly <34 weeks (n=5)Late > 34 weeks (n=40)720.60±589.53404.74±372.220.027*-0.33
2.Severity- No severe features (n=12)With severe features (n=26)Eclampsia (n=7)257.33±278.55384.27±415.50956.71±339.560.03*-
3.Systolic BP mm Hg140-159 (n=20)160 (n=25)396.2±388.88474.08±468.610.5540.206
4.Diastolic BP mmHg90-109 (n=30)110 (n=15)327.67±341.823663.07±513.940.012*0.145

*significant

p-value calculated by Mann-Whitney and r-value by Spearman correlation test.


In Group A 19 women had a total of 31 complications because more than one complication developed in some women. No women had any complication in Group B. Most of the complications occurred in antepartum period. Only four complications occurred in post-partum period i.e., two women had pulmonary oedema, one had CHF and one had cerebrovascular accident. Complications in Group A women occured mostly with NT-proBNP levels above 500 pg/mL. Though, some women with partial Haemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes, Low Platelet (HELLP) and renal dysfunction had lower NT-proBNP levels. All the cardiovascular complications in PE women occurred with NT-proBNP levels above 770 pg/mL [Table/Fig-5].

Association of Serum NT-proBNP with maternal complications.

Maternal complicationsNRange of NT-proBNP pg/mLMean NT-proBNP±SDpg/mLp-value
APH (Abruption)3506-914678±211.390.170
HELLP (complete)2770-867853±117.380.121
HELLP (partial)9141-1457783.22±535.6230.009*
Eclampsia7621-1682956.71±339.560.001*
Pulmonary oedema (1case in antepartum and 2 cases in post-partum period)3770-1405997±354.080.049*
Congestive heart failure(occurred in post-partum period)1770770±00.394
Cerebrovascular accident(occurred in post-partum period)1823823±00.314
Renal dysfunction460-1682891±662.580.155
Hypertensive retinopathy1850850±00.278

*significant p-value calculated by Mann-Whitney test


Sensitivity of NT-proBNP at a cut off value of 500 pg/mL was 78.94% with a specificity of 90% and a positive predictive value of 83.38%. Though, its sensitivity increased to 94.47% at a cut-off level of 100 pg/mL with a negative predictive value of 92.85% [Table/Fig-6].

Sensitivity and specificity of NT-proBNP and PE related complications.

Cut off levels of NT-proBNP pg/mLWomen with complica-tions (n)SensitivitySpecificityPositive predictive valueNegative predictive value
>5001578.94%90%83.38%87.09%
>2001789.47%73.09%70.83%90.47%
>1001894.47%50%58.06%92.85%

Calculated using 2 by 2 contingency table.


NT-proBNP-values were also analysed in PE women without severe features (n=12). It was observed that six women developed eight maternal complications as more than one complication developed in some women. These PE women without severe features, who developed complications had significant increased NT-proBNP than those women who did not develop any complication (p-value 0.02) [Table/Fig-7].

NT-proBNP and complications in PE women without severe features and early onset PE.

PE women without severe features (n=12)Early onset PE women (n=5)
Women who developed complicationsWomen who did not develop any complicationWomen who developed complicationsWomen who did not develop any complication
Number of women (n)6632
NT-proBNP range pg/mL60-91460-153914-145760-175
Mean NT-proBNP pg/mL434±307.21980.66±37.541122.67±292.50117.5±81.37
p-value0.02*0.083

*significant p-value calculated using Mann-Whitney test.


Discussion

We analysed NT-proBNP in 45 consecutive pre-eclamptic pregnant women and 45 normotensive pregnant women admitted in early labour with aim to evaluate NT-proBNP in both the groups and to correlate it with maternal outcome. We also evaluated its correlation with the various clinical characteristics like gestational age of onset of PE and its severity etc.

Demographic parameters in both the groups i.e., age, parity and period of gestation were comparable in both the groups. The mean age in our study was 25.31±3.30 and 25.91±4.67 years in Group A and Group B respectively which was lower than observed by other authors [25,26]. Nulliparous women comprised 57.7% in our study comparable to study by Kristensen K et al., [12]. A higher incidence (77%) of nulliparous women in a study on critically ill pre-eclamptic women was reported by Speksnijder L et al., [27].

Serum NT-proBNP in PE group (mean 439.47±431.99 pg/mL) was significantly high compared to control group (mean 99.40±37.89 pg/mL) in our study which corroborated with the observation by Kale A et al., and Sadlecki P et al [15,17].

A strong positive correlation of NT-proBNP with various biochemical markers of severity of PE i.e., SGOT, SGPT, LDH and S.Creatinine was observed (r-value 0.439, 0.431, 0.685 and 0.314) in our study. An increased NT-proBNP may indicate a biochemical deterioration of women’s PE status and may signify the need for an earlier intervention. This observation is in corroboration with study by Cabo Fustaret MC et al., (r-value 0.375 and 0.317 for SGOT and SGPT respectively) [28].

Early onset PE women (n=5) had significantly higher NT-proBNP levels in our study. Women having severe PE, 30% have early onset PE [29]. A negative correlation of NT-proBNP (p-value 0.027, r=-0.33) with gestational age at diagnosis of PE was found in our study. This was in corroboration with studies by Moghbeli N et al., Cabo Fustaret MC et al., and Junus K et al., [16,28,30].

In our study, mean NT-proBNP levels in PE women without severe features, with severe features and eclampsia were 257.33±278.55 pg/mL, 384.27+415.50 pg/mL and 956.71+339.56 pg/mL respectively. The association of NT-proBNP with these three sets of women was statistically significant. Seong WJ et al., also found higher levels of NT-proBNP in severe PE as compared to mild PE (1766.43 pg/mL versus 214.97 pg/mL) [26]. This observation is of clinical importance and signifies that women with higher levels of NT-proBNP levels require intensive monitoring and earlier intervention than women with lower levels. However, more studies are required to obtain a cut-off level of NT-proBNP for defining PE with and without severe features.

In our study, a total of 31 complications occurred in 19 women as many women had more than one complication. Partial HELLP syndrome was the most common complication and eclampsia was the second most common complication. Similar complications have been reported in other studies, though partial HELLP syndrome has not been mentioned in other studies. Aabidha PM et al., has reported antepartum haemorrhage as the commonest maternal complication in PE (13.97%) [31]. Adu-Bonsaffoh K et al., has reported eclampsia to be the most common complication [1] whereas Yücesoy G et al., reported eclampsia and HELLP syndrome in 11% of cases each [4].

In our study, NT-proBNP was found significantly associated with partial HELLP syndrome and eclampsia (p<0.05) [Table/Fig-5]. This signifies NT-proBNP to be a marker of these important maternal complications.

Mean levels of NT-proBNP were also significantly higher in women with pulmonary oedema (997±354.08 pg/mL) than in women without it (p-value 0.049) in Group A. This was similar to the study by Seong WJ et al., [32], who found NT-proBNP levels to be significantly higher in PE women with pulmonary oedema compared to those who did not have pulmonary oedema (5587.5±2397.6 pg/mL vs 600.5±360.6 pg/mL, p=0.000). Cabo Fustaret MC et al., found a significant association of NT-proBNP with cardiac failure (p=0.001) [28]. Speksnijder L et al., also reported significant positive correlations between NT-proBNP and diastolic pulmonary pressure (p=0.005) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p=0.015) [27]. Thus increased NT-proBNP is a useful marker of maternal cardio-vascular complications.

In our study increased NT-proBNP levels at term or onset of labour were associated with four postpartum complications, two cases of pulmonary oedema (mean NT-proBNP level 793±32.52 pg/mL), one case of CHF (NT-pro BNP level 770 pg/mL) and one case of cerebrovascular accident (NT-pro BNP level 823 pg/mL). Thus, it can be concluded that NT-proBNP is a useful predictor of peripartum PE related maternal complications.

In our study, NT-proBNP levels above 500 pg/mL had a good positive predictive value (83.38%) and below 100 pg//mL a good negative predictive value (92.85%) for PE related complications. Most of the complications in our study occurred with NT-proBNP levels above 500 pg/mL. We could not find any other study regarding sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of NT-pro BNP for all the PE related complications.

PE women without severe features were further analysed in terms of developing complications. It was seen that these PE women without severe features, the mean NT-proBNP levels were significantly high (p-value 0.02) in those women who had developed complications (mean 434±307.219 pg/mL) than those who did not (mean 80.66±37.54 pg/mL). Therefore, NT-proBNP appears to be a useful marker in women who are likely to develop complications even in women who do not have clinical or lab parameter of severe features. This is a novel finding of our study and can be extrapolated that NT-proBNP can predict complications in PE women without severe features. Early interventions and referrals to higher centers of these PE women without severe features with raised NT-proBNP values can prevent these complications and hence, maternal morbidity and mortality. We could not find similar study predicting maternal complications in PE women without any evidence of clinical or biochemical parameters of severe features.

We also analysed PE women (n=5) who had early onset at <34 weeks. Four complications occurred in three women. All these three women were found to have raised NT-proBNP (range 914-1457 pg/mL) with a mean of 1122.6 pg/mL. The two women who did not develop any complication had quite low NT-proBNP (range 60,175 pg/mL) with a mean of 117.5 pg/mL. Therefore lower NT-proBNP values in early onset PE women can predict a favourable maternal outcome. PE women who had increased NT-proBNP are associated with more complications and require earlier intervention.

Limitation

Our study included the antepartum and postpartum complications which occurred within two days of delivery. More studies are required with longer follow up, so as to study the association of NT-proBNP with long term complications in pre-eclamptic women.

Conclusion

Our study clearly illustrates that NT-proBNP levels are significantly higher in pre-eclamptic women than the controls. There is statistically significant association of NT-proBNP with life-threatening maternal complications. It has a sensitivity of 89.47% at a cut off level of 200 pg/mL and a specificity of 90% at a cut off level of 500 pg/mL. An association of NT-proBNP with severity of PE and early onset of PE is seen. In PE women without severe features significantly higher levels of NT-proBNP is associated with complications. In early onset PE, lower levels of NT-proBNP have a favorable outcome than those with higher levels of NT-proBNP. NT-proBNP therefore, is a useful marker for predicting life threatening maternal complications. It should be included in routine work up of PE women especially those without severe features as increased NT-proBNP levels may identify women who need referral to a tertiary care center and early intervention. Low levels of NT-proBNP are useful in identifying women who can be given conservative treatment in early onset PE.

References

[1]Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Obed SA, Seffah JD, Maternal outcomes of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014 127(3):238-42.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis Lancet Glob Health 2014 2(6):e323-33.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Center for disease control and prevention. Pregnancy mortality survillence system. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html. [Access date- 29 June 2017]  [Google Scholar]

[4]Yücesoy G, Ozkan S, Bodur H, Tan T, Calişkan E, Vural B, Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: a seven year experience of a tertiary care center Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005 273(1):43-49.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Dennis AT, Solnordal CB, Acute pulmonary oedema in pregnant women Anaesthesia 2012 67(6):646-59.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Melchiorre K, Thilaganathan B, Maternal cardiac function in pre-eclampsia Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011 23(6):440-47.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Zhou Y, Wu Q, Role of corin and atrial natriuretic peptide in preeclampsia Placenta 2013 34(2):89-94.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Dave A, Maru L, Jain A, LDH (Lactate Dehydrogenase): A biochemical marker for the prediction of adverse outcomes in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia J Obstet Gynaecol India 2016 66(1):23-29.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Mumtaz F, Memom AR, Yousfani S, Tahir SM, Khushk I, Memom M, Role of serum leptin as a marker of severity of pre-eclampsia J Ayub Coll Abbottabad 2008 20(1):13-15.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Sencer K, Cowans NJ, Chefetz I, Tal J, Meri H, First trimester maternal serum PP13, PAPP-A and second trimester uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index as markers of pre-eclampsia Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007 29(2):128-34.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Spencer K, Cowans NJ, Nicolaides KH, Maternal serum inhibin A and activin A levels in first trimester of pregnancies developing pre-eclampsia Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008 32(5):622-26.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Kristensen K, Wide-Swensson D, Schmidt C, Blirup-Jensen S, Lindström V, Strevens H, Cystatin C, beta-2-microglobulin and beta-trace protein in pre-eclampsia Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007 86(8):921-26.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Stepan H, Herraiz I, Schlembach D, Verlohren S, Brennecke S, Chantraine Implementation of sFlt-1/PGF ratio for prediction and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia in singleton pregnancy: Implications for clinical practice Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015 45(3):241-46.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Resnik JL, Hong C, Resnik R, Kazanegra R, Beede J, Bhalla V, Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 193(2):450-54.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Kale A, Kale E, Yalinkaya A, Akdeniz N, Canoruç N, The comparison of amino-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels in pre-eclampsia and normotensive pregnancy J Perinat Med 2005 33(2):121-24.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Moghbeli N, Srinivas SK, Bastek J, Lu Y, Putt ME, Cappola TP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic Peptide as a biomarker for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy Am J Perinatol 2010 27(4):313-19.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Sadlecki P, Grabiec M, Walentowicz-Sadlecka M, Prenatal assessment of NT-pro BNP as a diagnostic tool for pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus PLoS One 2016 11(9):e 0162957  [Google Scholar]

[18]Weber M, Hamm C, Role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP in clinical routine Heart 2006 92(6):843-49.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Rodseth RN, B type natriuretic peptide-a diagnostic breakthrough in peri-operative cardiac risk assessment? Anaesthesia 2009 64(2):165-78.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Franz MB, Andreas M, Schiessl B, Zeisler H, Neubauer A, Kastl SP, NT-proBNP is increased in healthy pregnancies compared to non-pregnant controls Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009 88(2):234-37.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Sagie AL, Oz BB, Salpeter L, Celnikier DH, Arad I, Nir A, Plasma concentrations of N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretuic peptide in pregnant women near labour and during early puerperium Clinical Chemistry 2005 51(10):1909-10.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS, Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011 25(4):391-403.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Roberts JM, August PA, Bakris G, Barton JR, Bernstein IM, Druzin M, Hypertension in pregnancy: Executive summary Obstetrics & Gynecology 2013 122(5):1122-31.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Christenson RH, Tang WHW, Institute for Quality in Labouratory Medicine Series - Controversies in Labouratory Medicine: Insights Into B-type Natriuretic Peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide Measurements Med Gen Med 2006 8(2):62  [Google Scholar]

[25]Tihtonen KM, Koobi T, Vuolteenaho O, Huhtala HS, Uotila JT, Natriuretic peptides and hemodynamics in preeclampsia Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 196(4):328e1-7.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Seong WJ, Kim SC, Hong DG, Koo TB, Park IS, Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels in hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy Hypertens Pregnancy 2011 30(3):287-94.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Speksnijder L, Rutten JH, Van den Meiracker AH, De Bruin RJ, Lindemans J, Hop WC, Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a biomarker of cardiac filling pressures in pre-eclampsia Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010 153(1):12-15.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Cabo Fustaret MC, Escobar AM, Illia R, Uranga M, Rivas C, Lobenstein G, PP113. NT-Pro-BNP: A predictor of adverse maternal outcomes in hypertensive gestational syndromes? Pregnancy Hypertens 2012 2(3):301  [Google Scholar]

[29]Zhang X, Jia H, Wang Y, Xie J, Gu Y, Early and late onset severe preeclampsia: a clinicopathologic study of 178 placentas Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2015 44(12):879-83.  [Google Scholar]

[30]Junus K, Wikstrom AK, Larsson A, Olovsson M, Placental expression of proBNP/NT-proBNP and plasma levels of NT-pro BNP in early and late-onset pre-eclampsia Am J Hypertens 2014 27(9):1225-30.  [Google Scholar]

[31]Aabidha PM, Cherian AG, Paul E, Helan J, Maternal and fetal outcome in pre-eclampsia in a secondary care hospital in South India J Family Med Prim Care 2015 4(2):257-60.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Seong WJ, Lee TH, Lee YS, Cho YL, Chun SS, Park IS, Serum NT-proBNP level as a marker for cardiopulmonary function in preeclampsia Pregnancy hypertens 2010 1(Suppl 1):S70  [Google Scholar]