JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Surgery Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29501.10821
Year : 2017 | Month : Nov | Volume : 11 | Issue : 11 Full Version Page : PC01 - PC04

Current Clinical Spectrum and Management of Stricture Disease of Urethra: A Prospective Study

Ranjit Kumar Das1, Supriya Basu2, Debasis Maity3, Arpan Choudhary4, Ranjan Kumar Dey5, Vishnu Agarwal6, Md Dawood Khan7, Imran Khan8

1 Professor and Head, Department of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
2 Professor, Department of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
3 Consultant, Department of Urology, I. L. S. Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
4 Post Doctoral Trainee, Department of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
5 Associate Professor, Deparment of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
6 Post Doctoral Trainee, Department of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
7 Post Doctoral Trainee, Department of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
8 Post Doctoral Trainee, Department of Urology, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Arpan Choudhary, Room No. 36, KB Hostel, R G Kar Medical College Campus, Kshudiram Bose Sarani, Bidhan Sarani, Shyambazar, Kolkata-700004, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: jn_rpn@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Introduction

Stricture disease of urethra is widely prevalent throughout the world. However aetiology and management varies among different regions. Study of recent trend would help in better understanding of the disease.

Aim

To highlight the current clinical scenario and compare outcome of various treatment modalities for urethral stricture.

Materials and Methods

Prospective observational study included adult male patients of urethral stricture, admitted during March 2012 to September 2014. After history and examination, patients underwent uroflowmetry and post-void residual measurement, retrograde urethrogram and endoscopic evaluation. Treatment choice and outcomes were recorded. Patients were followed for a minimum of one year.

Results

Finally 110 patients were studied. Mean age was 38±15 years. Tobacco chewing and smoking was seen in 43.6% and 20.9% of cases respectively. Two-third of cases had obstructive urinary symptoms, while rests were brought in emergency with acute urinary retention or trauma, 18 cases had recurrent disease. Trauma was the most frequent cause (35.4%), followed by lichen sclerosis (23.6%). Most common site was bulbar region (36.4%), followed by external meatus (27.3%). For distal and pan-anterior strictures, substitution urethroplasty had higher success rate (100%) than urethral dilatation with steroids (60-70%). Anastomotic urethroplasty had durable outcome for bulbar strictures (88%), in comparison to internal urethrotomy (66%).

Conclusion

Young and middle aged patients were particular vulnerable for the stricture. Trauma, lichen sclerosis and infections were the leading causes. Bulbar region was the commonest affected site, with a rise in pan-anterior strictures. Open urethroplasty with or without graft had a clear edge over endourological procedures.

Keywords

Introduction

Urethral stricture is a mutifactorial obliterative disease of anterior urethra. Associated scar in the surrounding corpus spongiosum is known as ‘spongiofibrosis’ [1]. The scarring process can extend through the tissue of the corpus spongiosum and into adjacent structures. Contraction of this scar reduces the width of the urethral lumen. Anterior urethral stricture disease is a fairly common problem encountered by the urologists. The overall incidence of stricture disease varies from 0.6% to 0.9% worldwide [2]. Recent studies also find a similar rate of incidence of 0.9%, as compare to 1.4% in old series [3].

Strictures of the anterior urethra can be seen in patients of all ages, but their occurrence differs greatly among various populations [4]. Iatrogenic trauma is likely to be the most common cause of anterior urethral strictures now a day, however in some series inflammatory disease is responsible for the majority [5,6]. For a long time, urethral stricture disease is being managed by several procedures like dilatation, meatotomy, anastomotic or substitution urethroplasty using either grafts or flaps, but chances of recurrence, financial impact and morbidity of disease remains high [7].

In this study, we explored the epidemiology of urethral stricture disease along with evaluation and management in patients presenting in a teaching institute.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

Prospective observational study was undertaken in the Urology department from March 2012 to September 2014. Approval of institutional ethical committee was obtained. Patients were enrolled after taking written informed consent. Females, patients with neurological disease, prostatic enlargement and of less than 18 years were excluded from the study.

Data Collection

A total of 200 adult men of lower urinary tract symptoms were screened during the study period. All patients underwent initial work-up including history, physical examination, urine analysis, renal function measurement, uroflowmetry and Post-Void Residual (PVR) measurement. Stricture disease was suspected in cases with predominant obstructive symptoms, low Qmax or high PVR, with or without local evidence of lichen sclerosis. Retrograde Urethrography (RUG) and Voiding Cystourethrography (VCUG) was obtained in suspected cases followed by urethroscopy. Either radiological (RUG/VCUG) or urethroscopic evidence of stricture was necessary for confirmatory diagnosis. After work up of 200 patients, only 110 patients had radiological or endoscopic evidence of urethral stricture disease and were finally included in the study [Table/Fig-1] and further management of confirmed cases was recorded and patients were followed upto 1 year.

Screening of patients with non-prostatic, non-neurological lower urinary tract symptoms.

DiagnosisNumber of cases (n=200)
Urethral stricture disease110
Overactive bladder44
Urinary tract infection20
Chronic prostatitis14
Underactive bladder7
Bladder calculi5

Data Analysis

Patient’s demographics and stricture characteristics were obtained. Mean, median, standard deviation, percentage and range was utilized for presentation with the help of SPSS software (IBM Corporation, version 21.0). Primary Outcome of disease was defined as success or failure, and was analysed by site and procedure done. Success was labeled when patient voided with a Qmax of more than 15 ml/s or was able to calibrate urethra with a minimum of 12 Fr” catheter. Outcome was compared using Chi-square test. Alpha error was kept at 5% and confidence interval was set at 95%.

Results

Baseline Parameters

A total of 110 men with urethral stricture disease were included. Mean age was 38±15 years [Table/Fig-2]. Highest incidence was seen among the age group of 25-50 years (56.4%). Mean BMI was 23.5±4.2 kg/m2. Hypertension was the most common associated co morbidity (25.5%) followed by diabetes and cardiac disease. Addiction to tobacco chewing and smoking was seen in 43.6% and 20.9% of cases respectively.

Baseline parameters of study participants.

ParametersFrequency (n=110)
Age (years)38 ± 15 (12-80)
BMI (Kg/m2)23.5 ± 4.2 (17.0-38.5)
ResidenceUrban-57 (51.8%)Rural- 53 (48.2%)
ReligionHindu- 62 (56.4%)Muslim- 40 (36.4%)Others- 8 (7.2%)
Co-morbidityHypertension- 28 (25.5%)Diabetes- 14 (12.7%)Cardiac illness- 11 (10%)COPD- 4 (3.6%)
AddictionTobacco chewing- 48 (43.6%)Smoking- 23 (20.9%)Alcohol- 13 (11.8%)
PresentationPrimary- 92 (83.6%)Recurrent- 18 (16.4%)

Presentation

Obstructing urinary symptoms including poor stream, straining, incomplete emptying and intermittency were the presenting complaints in 66% of the patients. Mean Qmax and PVR was 6.4±2.6 ml/s and 165±68 ml respectively. 30% of cases presented with Suprapubic Catheterization (SPC) in situ, done for acute retention of urine or following the trauma. Five patients had features of urosepsis. Renal function deterioration was discovered in three cases. Eighteen patients had previous history of urethral surgery and five of them were crippled (>3 surgical corrections). Phimosis with urethral discharge was found in five cases. Three patients had multiple fistulas.

Stricture Characteristics

Trauma was the most common aetiology seen in 39 patients (35.4%), followed by lichen sclerosis or Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans (BXO) [Table/Fig-3]. Trauma was mostly resulted from the road traffic accidents and 10 patients had pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD). The most common site of disease was bulbar region (36.4%), followed by external urethral meatus in the study. Stricture length ranged from 0.5 cm to 12 cm, with mean of 3.3±2.6 cm. A complete obstruction was discovered in 27.2% of cases, while rest had partial obstruction.

Urethral stricture characteristics of the study patients.

VariablesCounts n (%)
Age wise incidence<25 years- 6 (5.5%)25 – 50 – 62 (56.4%)50 – 75 – 38 (34.5%)>75 – 4 (3.6%)
AetiologyTrauma- 39 (35.4%)BXO*- 26 (23.6%)Infection- 21 (19.1%)Idiopathic- 8 (7.3%)Catheterization- 6 (5.5%)Post-TUR- 6 (5.5%)Instrumentation- 2 (1.8%)Post-hypospadias- 2 (1.8%)
SiteMeatal- 30 (27.3%)Fossa navicularis- 11 (10.0%)Penile- 4 (3.6%)Bulbar- 40 (36.4%)Pan-anterior- 25 (22.7%)
Length<1 cm- 9 (8.2%)1-2 cm- 37 (33.6%)2-4 cm- 41 (37.3%)4-6 cm- 17(15.4%)>6 cm- 6 (5.5%)
DegreeComplete- 30 (27.2%)Partial- 80 (72.8%)

*- Balanitis xerotica obliterans.


Management and Outcome

For strictures involving meatus, meatotomy and Urethral Dilatation (UD) was successful in 83% of cases, while results of UD followed by Clobetasol and Tacrolimus application were inferior (67%, p=.233) [Table/Fig-4a]. Similarly for strictures extending upto fossa navicularis, UD and local agents proved less effective (60%). Though an extended meatotomy provided a less invasive alternative with excellent outcomes (100%, p=.099), splaying of urine and altered glans cosmesis were the main concerns. However in both these conditions, a Buccal Mucosal Graft (BMG) urethroplasty had higher and durable success rate (100%) in two years of follow up [Table/Fig-4b].

Comparison of various treatment options for urethral stricture disease according to site: a) Meatal strictures; b) Fossa navicularis and distal penile strictures; c) Bulbar urethral strictures; d) Pan-anterior urethral strictures.

For small bulbar strictures (<2 cm), optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) was a minimally invasive procedure, but one third of cases failed to void satisfactorily. Anastomotic urethroplasty including perineal progressive approach successfully restored the normal urination in 88% of cases. In longer bulbar strictures, augmentation urethroplasty with BMG was successful in 80% of cases (p=.329) [Table/Fig-4c]. For pan-anterior strictures, two-staged johanson urethroplasty and BMG urethroplasty had 75% and 90% success rate in two years. For patients not opted for surgery, UD with local agents provided modest benefit (60%, p=.399) [Table/Fig-4d]. Two crippled cases ultimately chose perineal urethrostomy and both were continent.

Adverse Events

Minor complications were seen in eight cases. Six cases developed wound infections and were managed by partial opening of wound and dressings. Two cases had haematoma formation at the wound site, which required evacuation and pressure dressing. Recurrence of stricture was found in eight cases (4 in bulbar, 2 in pan-urethral and 2 in fossa navicularis). Urethro-cutaneous fistula was discovered in two cases following anastomotic urethroplasty for PFUDD.

Discussion

Stricture disease of urethra is commonly encountered in urological practice in both developed and developing countries. Data from developed world reveals a high prevalence after 55 years of age [8]. However, we found the majority of disease (61.9%) affecting a much younger population (<50 years). Reason may be the high rate of smoking and tobacco chewing in this region. Recent literature describes the trauma and iatrogenic factors to be the leading cause of the stricture disease [5]. In our series, though trauma due to road traffic accidents was the most common cause, BXO and infection together accounted for 42.7% of cases. Later conditions still accounts for a large burden of disease in developing nations. Obstructive LUTS are the classical presenting symptom in the literature; we additionally encountered many delayed presentations with complications including fistulas, deranged renal function and urosepsis [9].

Distal urethral strictures involving meatal, fossa navicularis and pendulous urethra differ from bulbar stricture with respect to their aetiology and nature [10]. Former are usually longer than bulbar strictures and most often have a non-traumatic aetiology [11]. In our series BXO and chronic infection caused majority of distal urethral strictures (70%), while trauma was the main culprit in bulbar strictures (90%). Average stricture length in bulbar region was 1.5±.7 cm, while in distal region it was 2.3±1.1 cm.

Management of urethral stricture disease within each urethral segment is determined by the individual aetiologic characteristics, cosmetics and availability of local tissues for the use in reconstruction [12]. For distal urethral strictures, recent studies support substitution urethroplasty over repeated UD or meatotomy [13]. We found later procedures to be effective in only 60-80% of cases, while BMG urethroplasty provided excellent results approaching 100%. Various claims of improvement after local application of Clobetasol, Tacrolimus along with UD has been made recently, but our results showed a modest benefit in around 60% of cases only [14].

Despite a high rate of recurrence after internal urethrotomy for bulbar strictures, it is the commonest procedure performed worldwide [15,16]. Out of our 40 cases of bulbar strictures, 26 (65%) underwent anastomotic repair. It still provided highest success rate (88%) compare to OIU (66%). Two third of OIU cases required a second OIU within 6 months. Cochrane database review analysed the efficacy of UD, OIU and urethroplasty in 2012. They failed to provide an answer to best treatment option due to lack of sufficient, well designed randomized studies [17]. However recent studies have shown a trend more in favour of definite open procedures compare to endourological [18,19].

Pan-urethral strictures are a surgical challenge as the inflammatory pathologies result in significant amount of spongiofibrosis. Results of repair are highly variable and range from 20-80% in the most series [20]. Kulkarni SB et al., reported good success with single stage BMG urethroplasty via perineal approach and penile inversion technique [21]. We utilized the same technique in 10 cases and nine were able to void satisfactorily. Two staged urethroplasty is also an attractive alternative especially in recurrent, post hypospadias and complicated cases with infection or fistula [22]. We performed it in eight of our cases with 75% success rate. UD with local agents were tried in five cases, who refused surgery. Only three of them could void successfully. Perineal urethrostomy was utilized as a last resort in two failed cases with multiple repairs.

Issue of intermittent self dilatation after urethroplasty is still unresolved due to lack of robust evidence [23,24]. Our protocol was to instruct the patients to perform self dilatation daily for one month after surgery and decrease the frequency to once a week in next six months. After one year self dilatation was stopped. Follow up guidelines after urethroplasty are also non-uniform and consisting of use of flexible urethroscopy, PVR measurement, uroflowmetry, retrograde urethrogram and patient reported outcome over a variable intervals [25]. We followed the patients three monthly with PVR and uroflowmetry.

Limitation

Limitations of this study are the limited number of cases, lack of cost analysis, sexual function measurement and patient reported outcomes. A large prospective multicentre randomized study is suggested including these issues.

Conclusion

Urethral stricture disease affects more of young and middle age population. Trauma, BXO and infections are the leading causes. Disease location and extent in different segments of urethra impart an additional challenge. Its management continues to evolve with results favouring urethroplasty over internal urethrotomy and dilatation. For longer and recurrent strictures, substitution urethroplasty offer excellent success rate. Intermittent self catheterization appears to offer long term benefit.

References

[1]Smith TG 3rd, Current management of urethral stricture disease Indian J Urol 2016 32(1):27-33.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M, Male urethral stricture disease J Urol 2007 177(5):166774  [Google Scholar]

[3]Anger JT, Buckley JC, Santucci RA, Elliott SP, Saigal CS, Urologic diseases in America Project. Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty? Urology 2011 77(2):481-85.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Verze P, De Nunzio C, Vitarelli A, Carmignani L, Contemporary urethral stricture characteristics in the developed world Urology 2013 81(1):19196  [Google Scholar]

[5]Tritschler S, Roosen A, Füllhase C, Stief CG, Rübben H, Urethral stricture: aetiology, investigation and treatments Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013 110(13):220-26.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Fall B, Sow Y, Mansouri I, Sarr A, Thiam A, Diao B, Etiology and current clinical characteristics of male urethral stricture disease: experience from a public teaching hospital in Senegal Int Urol Nephrol 2011 43(4):969-74.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Anger JT, Santucci R, Grossberg AL, Saigal CS, The morbidity of urethral stricture disease among male medicare beneficiaries BMC Urol 2010 10:3  [Google Scholar]

[8]Alwaal A, Blaschko SD, McAninch JW, Breyer BN, Epidemiology of urethral strictures Transl Androl Urol 2014 3(2):209-13.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Rourke K, Hickle J, The clinical spectrum of the presenting signs and symptoms of anterior urethral stricture: detailed analysis of a single institutional cohort Urology 2012 79(5):116367  [Google Scholar]

[10]Fenton AS, Morey AF, Aviles R, Garcia CR, Anterior urethral strictures: etiology and characteristics Urology 2005 65(6):1055-58.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Das S, Tunuguntla HS, Balanitis xerotica obliterans--a review World J Urol 2000 18(6):382-87.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Gallegos MA, Santucci RA, Advances in urethral stricture management F1000Res 2016 5:2913  [Google Scholar]

[13]Lacy JM, Cavallini M, Bylund JR, Strup SE, Preston DM, Trends in the management of male urethral stricture disease in the veteran population Urology 2014 84(6):150609  [Google Scholar]

[14]Potts BA, Belsante MJ, Peterson AC, Intraurethral Steroids are a safe and effective treatment for stricture disease in patients with biopsy proven lichen sclerosus J Urol 2016 195(6):1790-96.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Palminteri E, Maruccia S, Berdondini E, Di Pierro GB, Sedigh O, Rocco F, Male urethral strictures: a national survey among urologists in Italy Urology 2014 83(2):477-84.  [Google Scholar]

[16]van Leeuwen MA, Brandenburg JJ, Kok ET, Vijverberg PL, Bosch JL, Management of adult anterior urethral stricture disease: nationwide survey among urologists in the Netherlands Eur Urol 2011 60(1):159-66.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Wong SS, Aboumarzouk OM, Narahari R, O’Riordan A, Pickard R, Simple urethral dilatation, endoscopic urethrotomy, and urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease in adult men Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 12:CD006934  [Google Scholar]

[18]Xu YM, Song LJ, Wang KJ, Lin J, Sun G, Yue ZJ, Changing trends in the causes and management of male urethral stricture disease in China: an observational descriptive study from 13 centres BJU Int 2015 16(6):93844  [Google Scholar]

[19]Liu JS, Hofer MD, Oberlin DT, Milose J, Flury SC, Morey AF, Practice patterns in the treatment of urethral stricture among American urologists: a paradigm change? Urology 2015 86(4):830-34.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Martins FE, Kulkarni SB, Joshi P, Warner J, Martins N, Management of long-segment and panurethral stricture disease Adv Urol 2015 (2015):853914  [Google Scholar]

[21]Kulkarni SB, Joshi PM, Venkatesan K, Management of panurethral stricture disease in India J Urol 2012 188(3):824-30.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Andrich DE, Mundy AR, Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts J Urol 2001 165(4):1131-33.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Jackson MJ, Veeratterapillay R, Harding CK, Dorkin TJ, Intermittent selfdilatation for urethral stricture disease in males Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 (12):CD010258  [Google Scholar]

[24]Ivaz SL, Veeratterapillay R, Jackson MJ, Harding CK, Dorkin TJ, Andrich DE, Intermittent selfdilatation for urethral stricture disease in males: A systematic review and metaanalysis Neurourol Urodyn 2016 35(7):75963  [Google Scholar]

[25]Erickson BA, Ghareeb GM, Definition of successful treatment and optimal follow-up after urethral reconstruction for urethral stricture disease Urol Clin North Am 2017 44(1):1-9.  [Google Scholar]