JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Internal Medicine Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29603.10656
Year : 2017 | Month : Sep | Volume : 11 | Issue : 9 Full Version Page : OC29 - OC32

Intravenous Fluid Administration and the Survival of Pre hospital Resuscitated out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in Thailand

Phichet Nongchang1, Wongsa Laohasiri Wong2, Somsak Pitaksanurat3, Pairoj Boonsirik Amchai4

1 PhD Scholar, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Public Health and Research and Training Center for Enhancing Quality of Life for Working Age People, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
4 Deputy Secretary-General, National Institute for Emergency Medicine, Nonthaburi, Thailand.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Wongsa Laohasiri wong, Associate Professor, Faculty of Public Health and Research and Training Center for Enhancing Quality of Life for Working Age People, Khan Kaen, Thailand.
E-mail: drwongsa@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of death worldwide. The Emergency Medical Service (EMS) provides early care to critical OHCA patients. Pre hospital intervention has been improving OHCA survival rate, however it is still unclear for the recommendation of routine infusion of Intravenous (IV) fluids during cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Aim

This study aimed to determine whether IV fluid administration was associated with increasing survival of resuscitated OHCA patients and to assess the survival rate of resuscitated OHCA patients.

Materials and Methods

This cross-divtional analytical study was conducted among 33,006 resuscitated OHCA patients who received emergency medical service in Thailand. Data set from the EMS Registry of the OHCA patients who received Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) during January 2011 to December 2015 was enrolled as per inclusion criteria. Data were analysed by using both descriptive statistic and multiple logistic regression.

Results

The result indicated that 27,270 OHCA patients (82.62%:95%CI=82.121-83.030%) survived until they reached hospital. In addition, after adjusting for effect modifiers and covariates, it was found that adult (≥18 years) with IV fluid administration were more likely to survive (adjusted OR=4.389; 95% CI: 3.911-4.744) when compared to children (<18 years) with IV fluid administration (adjusted OR =2.952; 95% CI: 2.040-4.273). Other factors associated with OHCA patients’ survival were female gender (adjusted OR =1.151; 95% CI: 1.067-1.241), response time per minutes (adjusted OR =0.993; 95% CI: 0.989-0.997), scene time per minutes (adjusted OR=0.948; 95% CI: 0.944-0.952) and transport time per minutes (adjusted OR=0.973, 95%CI: 0.968-0.978).

Conclusion

This study revealed that IV fluid administration was significantly associated with survival of OHCA patients while controlled other covariates including female gender, response time, scene time and transport time. Therefore, it is recommended that the IV fluid administration should be medicated for resuscitated OHCA patients.

Keywords

Introduction

OHCA is a leading cause of death worldwide. Over the past decade, the systems have been developed to improve the quality of OHCA care. However, the survival rate to hospital discharge for OHCA patients is still poor and it was reported that the survival rate was between 0.5%-10.4% [1-4]. Previous studies identified factors affecting survival of OHCA patients, including: CPR, gender, age, location where arrest occurred, time of the day on pre hospital care, response time, scene time, transport time, Automated External Defibrillator (AED) application, and IV fluid administration. In addition, these factors may be associated with survival rate of OHCA patients in rather complicated ways [5-12].

IV fluid loading is commonly performed during pre hospital resuscitation for OHCA patients in Thailand. Studies indicated that IV fluid administration was associated with improvement in survival rate to hospital discharge of children with OHCA and it improved one month survival of adult OHCA patients with non cardiac origin [9,10]. Studies among pediatric OHCA patients and non cardiac arrest origin of OHCA patients indicated that improving pre hospital survival was related to IV fluid administration and pre hospital intervention care [9,10]. It is, yet, unclear that IV fluid administration could improve survival rate of OHCA. There is insufficient evidence whether to recommend infusion of IV fluids during cardiac arrest resuscitation by ALS or not [13]. Investigation of the effect on IV fluid administration to survival of OHCA patients is still needed. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether IV fluid administration was associated with the improvement of survival rate of OHCA patients in Thailand.

Materials and Methods

Ethical Consideration

An informed consent was taken from visitors of each respondent because it all respondents were critically ill. Ethical clearance was approved by Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for human research with the reference number HE592021. Permission to undertake this study was obtained from National Institute for Emergency Medicine, Thailand.

Study Design

This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using data from the national emergency medical service registry of the National Institute for Emergency Medicine (NIEM), Thailand. Data considered in the present study were from OHCA patients receiving CPR by ALS teams between January, 2011 and December, 2015; OHCA patients receiving CPR but died before arrival to a hospital were excluded.

Patient’s age and IV fluid were considered as potential effect modifiers of the outcome. Patients were stratified by age group of children and adult groups (<18, and ≥18-year-old) and IV fluid (received or not). Variables considered in the present study were: (1) Patient factors: age, gender, period of pre hospital care (day/night); (2) EMS factors: response time (from receiving a call to arrival at the scene), scene time (from arrival to departure from the scene), transport time (from scene to arrival at the hospital), were mentioned in minutes; and (3) Therapeutic factors: AED or Defibrillator (DF) and intravenous fluid administration.

The primary outcome of this study was survival rate to the hospital. Survival rate to the hospital was defined as OHCA patients who received resuscitation and did not pass away before arrival to the hospital and those patients who were dying on scene after the ALS team had arrived or during transportation after unsuccessful resuscitation were considered as “not survived” [14]. Thus, those who were passing away before the arrival of the ALS teams on the scene were excluded.

Statistical Analysis

All variables were summarized by using descriptive statistics with frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables, and means standard deviations for continuous variables. The age categories (<18 and ≥18 years) were chosen based on clinical rationale and to match previous study [15-17]. Categories of time of day on pre hospital care (day: 8.30 am to 4.30 pm, night: 4.31 pm to 7.29 am) was defined by the time EMS personnel working, office hours of hospital and match previous study [7,18]. Crude OR as well as adjusted OR was obtained by using binary mixed effects logistic regression. The best model was identified using the purposeful selection of covariates approach [19]. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted by considering all covariates and interaction terms (age* IV fluid). Purposeful Selection of Covariates (PSC) is later involved on the process. Briefly, PSC allowed all “potentially” important variables in to the model (p<0.25) then was sequentially excluded for reasons of non statistical significance and also rechecked their statistical significance in further steps along with their potential for inclusion as a confounders. As, IV fluid and age group were the study effect, these predictors were mandatory included into the model. All statistical analysis was conducted using Stata version 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

Results

The Thai EMS database of 2011-2015 reported 35,305 OHCA patients. However, only 33,006 OHCA patients received CPR. Therefore, only these patients were selected to include in this study. In the critical situation of death or alive of the patients, the rescue team were more focused on life saving and sending them to the hospital. Therefore, few data, such as age and sex were improperly recorded. Although, we have analysed the available data and the data were handled properly for missing values during analysis.

Of the total 33,006 OHCA patients who received CPR, 90.36% aged ≥18 years, 70.5% were male; 82.62% (95% CI= 82.121-83.030) survived to the hospital. Most of the OHCA occurred at night (61.29%). The mean response time was 10.9±8.9 minutes), mean scene time was 7.3 ±8.3 minutes), and mean transport time was 8.3±7.3 minutes). In addition, 7.4% had AED. Almost all (91.2%, 30,088 patients) received IV fluid [Table/Fig-1]. In bivariate analysis, patients who received IV fluids had higher odd of survival (OR=3.935, 95% CI: 3.631-4.263), as well as female patients OR=1.098, 95% CI: 1.026-1.175). The increased response time (per minute) (OR=0.984, 95% CI: 0.981-0.986), scene time (per minute) (OR=0.943, 95% CI:0.939-0.946), transport time (per minute) (OR=0.964, 95% CI: 0.961-0.968), AED/DF (OR=0.675, 95% CI: 0.611-0.745), and night time (OR=0.854, 95% CI: 0.805-0.906) decreased the odds of survival of the OHCA patients [Table/Fig-2].

Characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

Factorsn (%) or Mean ±SD
Patient factors
Gender
Male21,423(70.5%)
Female8,948(29.5%)
Age group
Children< 18 years1,978(6.2%)
Adult ≥ 18 years29,825(93.8%)
Time of day on pre hospital care
Day12,776(38.7%)
Night20,230(61.3%)
EMS factors
Response times (minutes)10.9± 8.9
Scene times (minutes)7.3± 8.3
Transport times (minutes)8.3± 7.3
Therapeutic factors
AED/DF2,452(7.4%)
Intravenous fluid Administration30,088(91.2%)

Remark: The total number of samples was 33,006 persons

Some variables has missing values, therefore their summary were less than 33,006


Survival rate to hospital and factors associated with survival rate of OHCA in bivariate analysis.

FactorsTotalNumber (%)OR Crude95% CIp-value
Intravenous fluid administration
No2,918 (58.9)1<0.001
Yes30,088 (84.9)3.9353.631-4.263
AED/DF
No30,554 (83.1)1<0.001
Yes2,452 (76.8)0.6750.611-0.745
Gender
Male21,423 (83.4)10.007
Female8,948 (84.7)1.0981.026-1.175
Age
< 18 Years1,978 (85.0)10.439
≥ 18 Years29,825 (84.3)0.9510.838-1.080
EMS factors
Response times (minutes)32,178 (84.0)0.9840.981-0.986<0.001
Scene time (minutes)31,797 (84.0)0.9430.939-0.946<0.001
Transport time (minutes)31,769 (84.8)0.9640.961-0.968<0.001
Time at day
Day (8.30 am to 4.30 pm)12,776 (84.0)1<0.001
Night (4.31 pm to 7.29 am)20,230 (81.8)0.8540.805-0.906

Remark: The total number of samples was 33,006 persons

Some variables has missing values, therefore their summary were less than 33,006


Then, a multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationships between pre hospital IV fluid infusion and survival rate of the 33,006 patients with complete data. After adjustment of the covariates, pre hospital IV fluid infused patients had a significant higher survival rate than those who didn’t receive pre hospital IV infusion. The survival rate were associated with pre hospital IV fluid infusion both among children (adjusted OR=2.952; 95% CI: 2.040-4.273) and adult (adjusted OR=4.389; 95% CI: 3.911-4.744). Moreover, female had high survival rate than that of males (adjusted OR=1.151; 95% CI: 1.067-1.241). Every minute increase of response time, scene time and transport time significantly decreased the odd of survival among OHCA patients when they reached the hospital (adjusted OR=0.993; 95% CI: 0.989-0.997, adjusted OR =0.948, 95% CI: 0.944-0.952 and adjusted OR =0.973, 95% CI: 0.968-0.978) respectively [Table/Fig-3].

Multivariable regression model for survival rate, with interaction of survival rate with intravenous fluid administration and age group.

FactorTotalNumber (%)OR CrudeOR Adjusted95% CIp-value
IV fluid administration in aged group
Children (< 18 years)
No191 (70.2)11<0.001
Yes1,787 (86.6)2.7422.9522.040-4.273
Adult (≥ 18 years)
No2,550 (59.7)11<0.001
Yes27,275 (86.4)4.3894.3083.911-4.744
Gender
Male21,423 (83.4)11<0.001
Female8,948 (84.7)1.0981.1511.067-1.241
EMS factors
Response times (minutes)32,178 (84.0)0.9840.9930.989-0.997<0.001
Scene time (minutes)31,797 (84.0)0.9430.9480.944-0.952<0.001
Transport time (minutes)31,769 (84.8)0.9640.9730.968-0.978<0.001

Remark: The total number of samples was 33,006 persons

Some variables has missing values, therefore their summary were less than 33,006


Discussion

The survival rate of OHCA patients when reached to the hospital in this study was 82.6% (95% CI=82.121-83.030). Previous studies documented that in Thailand, the survival rate of OHCA were 53% [20,21]. This might be due to different EMS coverage, numbers of ALS team and CPR knowledge to people.

The result suggested that in Thailand, survival rate among OHCA patients is considerably higher than other countries [1-4]. Beside an improvement of ALS care for OHCA patients, other possible explanation might be that we used a short term patient outcome (survival until the patient reach to the hospital) which could reflect the quality pre hospital EMS better than long term survival. Long term survival of the patients covered the survival of the patients until they were discharged from the hospital. Therefore, quality of care in the hospital such as in emergency unit, intensive care unit or hospital wards has influences on the patient’s long term survival.

This study investigated the association between IV fluid administration of resuscitated OHCA patients and survival rate of OHCA patients. The result of study showed an increasing odds of survival to the hospital for OHCA patients who received intravenous fluid. It was explained that IV fluid transfusion helps increasing intravascular volume, cardiac output and improve organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In addition, after patient Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC), IV fluid transfusion does not only improve cardiac output but also increase patient’s blood pressure [22-24]. Previous study also reported that isotonic crystalloids had a primary function for expanding the amount of intravascular fluid in an attempt to increase blood pressure and deliver the red blood cells and oxygen that they carried to body tissues [25]. Therefore, the OHCA patients who received IV fluid had an increasing survival rate to the hospital.

This study observed that the survival rate was associated to pre hospital IV fluid infusion for children. The fluid and vasoactive infusion were used for maintaining systolic blood pressure after ROSC in paediatric ALS [26]. Consistent with previous studies, administration of IV fluid was associated to improve survival rate to hospital discharge [10]. In addition, hypertonic saline infusion during resuscitation from OHCA was achieved from short term survival rates (admission to hospital with spontaneous circulation) [27]. The hospitalized children who received maintenance of IV fluid therapy, isotonic solutions had significantly decreased the risk of developing hyponatremia [28]. Isotonic crystalloids increased blood pressure and delivered the red blood cells and oxygen that they carried to body tissues [25].

These finding also showed that adult, who received IV fluid administration, had also an improvement in the survival rate of OHCA patients, which was consistent with other study conducted in Japan [9]. Previous study focused on adult OHCA patients of non cardiac origin has long term survival rate [9]. This study assessed survival rate of OHCA patients when they reach to hospital, since its better to reflex quality of pre hospital EMS among critical patients. Long term survival depends on hospital treatment, including critical care and other advanced treatments of underlying diseases [29]. In addition, other studies have also found that the pre hospital use of lactate Ringer’s solution was associated with survival of ROSC before hospital arrival [30]. Patients who received hypertonic saline showed a trend to have higher resuscitation success and hospital admission survival rates as well as a small improvement in neurological outcome among survivors on discharge [31,32].

This study also identified other factors associated with OHCA patient survival rate to the hospital such as response times, scene time, transport time and gender. However, these factors had a slight association with survival rate to the hospital. Although, spending more response time affected to the decreasing of survival rate to the hospital. Being consistent with several previous studies, early EMS and response time were associated with OHCA patient survival [9,33,34]. An increasing scene time affected to give even worse survival rate to the hospital. This finding is opposite to the previous study which demonstrated the survival discharge was at its highest in the first 10 to 35 minutes on scene time group compared to the >35 minutes group and the <10 minutes group [10]. This study demonstrated higher transport time was also associated with the decreasing chance of survival rate to the hospital. Other studies have found that transport time was not associated with survival rate to the hospital discharge [11]. This might be due to different EMS in Thailand that was a scoop and run approach whereas our study observed survival outcome in short term.

Moreover, female OHCA patients demonstrated a higher chance of survival rate compared to males. Being consistent with several previous studies, females had a higher chance of survival more than males [5,6,17,35]. In contrast, several previous studies also showed that males had a higher chance of survival rate than females. This might be due to different causes of cardiac arrest and severe critical conditions [33,36-38] which signified that both sex are equally associated with OHCA however the causes of cardiac arrest determine the results.

Limitation

This nation wide cross-sectional analytical study had great advantage in term of having the country representative samples. However, few limitations are always associated in every study which has been illustrated as follows; first, data used in this study didn’t record resuscitation drug. The pre hospital IV fluid was only isotonic crystalloids. A second potential limitation was that data used in this study were OHCA patients who were receiving care of ALS teams in 76 out of the 77 provinces of Thailand, with an exceptional province of Bangkok. This is due to an administrative issue found in this province, where several EMS systems were running simultaneously. In addition, only one of which has fallen under the supports of the National Institute for Emergency Medicine. Lastly, most of the previous studies of OHCA patients used the UT stein-style reporting templates [9,27,30,31,34], but data collection used in this study involved the use of a Case Record Form (CRF) of the EMS, Thailand. Consequently, some potentially important predictors have not yet measured (e.g., witnessed, bystander CPR, location of arrest).

Conclusion

In Thailand, patients who experienced pre hospital resuscitated OHCA with the IV fluid infusion had increasing odd of survival to the hospital in the condition that quality of EMS was improved by reducing response, scene and transport times. The recommendation is improving the system to shortening the time used at scene and transport and IV fluid transfusion for improving short term survival of OHCA.

Remark: The total number of samples was 33,006 personsSome variables has missing values, therefore their summary were less than 33,006Remark: The total number of samples was 33,006 personsSome variables has missing values, therefore their summary were less than 33,006Remark: The total number of samples was 33,006 personsSome variables has missing values, therefore their summary were less than 33,006

References

[1]Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW, Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest andsurvival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies Resuscitation 2010 81(11):1479-87.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation 2014 129(3):e28-292.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Perkins GD, Lockey AS, de Belder MA, Moore F, Weissberg P, Gray H, National initiatives to improve outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in England Emerg Med J 2016 33(7):448-51.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Ong MEH, Shin SD, De Souza NNA, Tanaka H, Nishiuchi T, Song KJ, Outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across 7 countries in Asia: The Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) Resuscitation 2015 96:100-08.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Johnson MA, Haukoos JS, Larabee TM, Daugherty S, Chan PS, McNally B, Females of childbearing age have a survival benefit after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation 2013 84(5):639-44.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Bray JE, Stub D, Bernard S, Smith K, Exploring gender differences and the “oestrogen effect” in an Australian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest population Resuscitation 2013 84(7):957-63.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Wallace SK, Abella BS, Shofer FS, Leary M, Agarwal AK, Mechem CC, Effect of time of day on pre hospital care and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Circulation 2013 127(15):1591-96.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Vukmir RB, Survival from pre hospital cardiac arrest is critically dependent upon response time Resuscitation 2006 69(2):229-34.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Kitamura T, Kiyohara K, Sakai T, Iwami T, Nishiyama C, Kajino K, Epidemiology and outcome of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin in Osaka: a population-based study BMJ Open 2014 4(12):e006462  [Google Scholar]

[10]Tijssen JA, Prince DK, Morrison LJ, Atkins DL, Austin MA, Berg R, Time on the scene and interventions are associated with improved survival in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation 2015 94:01-07.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Chikani V, Clark L, Mullins T, The impact of Pre hospital transport interval on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Implications for Regionalization of post-resuscitation care Resuscitation 2008 79(1):61-66.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Weisfeldt ML, Everson-Stewart S, Sitlani C, Rea T, Aufderheide TP, Atkins DL, Ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac arrest in public versus at home New England Journal of Medicine 2011 364(4):313-21.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Laurie J Morrison, Charles D Deakin, Peter T. Morley, Clifton W. Callaway, Richard E. Kerber, Steven L. Kronick, Part 8:Advanced life support 2010 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations Circulation 2010 122:S345-S421.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Photipim M, Laohasiriwong W, Thinkhamrop B, Sethasathien A, Hurst C, The effect of response time on survival among non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Thailand J Health Res 2016 30(1):19-24.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Jayaram N, McNally B, Tang F, Chan PS, Survival After out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children J Am Heart Assoc 2015 4(10):e002122  [Google Scholar]

[16]Goto Y, Funada A, Nakatsu-Goto Y, Neurological outcomes in children dead on hospital arrival Crit Care [Internet] 2015 [cited 2015 Nov 29] :19Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4652393/  [Google Scholar]

[17]Herlitz J, Svensson L, Engdahl J, Gelberg J, Silfverstolpe J, Wisten A, Characteristics of cardiac arrest and resuscitation by age group: an analysis from the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry Am J Emerg Med 2007 25(9):1025-31.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Uray T, Sterz F, Weiser C, Schreiber W, Spiel A, Schober A, Quality of post arrest care does not differ by time of day at a specialized resuscitation center Medicine (Baltimore) 2015 94(14)Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554053/. [cited 2015 Nov 2]  [Google Scholar]

[19]Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Applied logistic regression 2000 2nd edNew YorkWiley  [Google Scholar]

[20]Yeeheng U, Factors associated with successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at rajavithi hospital’s narenthorn emergency medical service center, Thailand Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 2011 23(4):601-07.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Monsomboon A, Chantawatsharakorn P, Suksuriyayothin S, Keorochana K, Mukda A, Prapruetkit N, Prevalence of emergency medical service utilisation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Thailand Emerg Med J 2015 33(3):213-17.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Jasmeet S, Jane F, Raoul B, Fluid infusion during CPR and after ROSC-Is it safe? Resuscitation 2009 80:1212-22.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Myburgh JA, Mythen MG, Resuscitation Fluids The New England Journal of Medicine 2013 369(13):1243-51.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Al-Klafaji A, Webb AR, Fluid resuscitation Critical Care & pain 2004 5:127-31.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Rob Curran. Fluid Resuscitation. 2010. [online] [cited 2016 Sep 10]. Available from: http://www.emsworld.com/article/10319780/fluid-resuscitation  [Google Scholar]

[26]American Heart Association. Highlights of the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for CPR and ECC. [online] [cited 2015 Nov 22]. Available from: https://eccguidelines.heart.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-AHA-Guidelines-Highlights-English.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[27]Hahna C, Breil M, Scheweb JC, Messelkena M, Raucha S, Gräsnerc JT, Hypertonic saline infusion during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A matched-pair study from the German Resuscitation Registry Resuscitation 2014 (85):628-36.  [Google Scholar]

[28]Padua AP, Macaraya JRG, Dans LF, Francisco E, Anacleto Jr, Isotonic versus hypotonic saline solution for maintenance intravenous fluid therapy in children: a systematic review Pediatr Nephrol 2015 30:1163-72.  [Google Scholar]

[29]American Heart Association. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. Web-based Integrated 2010 & 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. 2015. [online] [cited 2015 Nov 22]. Available from:https://eccguidelines.heart.org/index.php/circulation/cpr-ecc-guidelines-2/part-7-adult-advanced-cardiovascular-life-support.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[30]Hagihara A, Hasegawa M, Abe T, Wakata Y, Nagata T, Nabeshima Y, Pre hospital lactated ringer’s solution treatment and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort analysis PLoS Med 2013 10(2):e1001394  [Google Scholar]

[31]Bendera R, Breil M, Heistera U, Dahmena A, Hoefta A, Krepc H, Hypertonic saline during CPR: Feasibility and safety of a new protocol of fluid management during resuscitation Resuscitation 2007 72:74-81.  [Google Scholar]

[32]Breil M, Krepb H, Heister U, Bartsch A, Bender R, Schaefers B, Randomised study of hypertonic saline infusion during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Resuscitation 2012 83:347-52.  [Google Scholar]

[33]Deasy C, Bray JE, Smith K, Harriss LR, Bernard SA, Cameron P, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the older age groups in Melbourne, Australia Resuscitation 2011 82(4):398-403.  [Google Scholar]

[34]Herlitz J, Svensson L, Engdahl J, Silfverstolpe J, Characteristics and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when patients are found in a non-shockable rhythm Resuscitation 2008 76(1):31-36.  [Google Scholar]

[35]Koike S, Tanabe S, Ogawa T, Akahane M, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Effect of time and day of admission on 1-month survival and neurologically favourable 1-month survival in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest patients Resuscitation 2011 82(7):863-68.  [Google Scholar]

[36]Koike S, Ogawa T, Tanabe S, Matsumoto S, Akahane M, Yasunaga H, Collapse-to-emergency medical service cardiopulmonary resuscitation interval and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a nationwide observational study Crit Care Lond Engl 2011 15(3):R120  [Google Scholar]

[37]Andersen LW, Bivens MJ, Giberson T, Giberson B, Mottley JL, Gautam S, The relationship between age and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients Resuscitation 2015 94:49-54.  [Google Scholar]

[38]Safdar B, Stolz U, Stiell IG, Cone DC, Bobrow BJ, deBoehr M, Differential survival for menand women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: results from the OPALS study Acad Emerg Med 2014 21(12):1503-11.  [Google Scholar]