Radiology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28183.10535
Year : 2017 | Month : Sep | Volume : 11 | Issue : 9 Page : TC06 - TC09

Radiological Manifestations of Pulmonary Tuberculosis - A Comparative Study between Immunocompromised and Immunocompetent Patients

Manoj Mathur1, Rajesh K Badhan2, Sudesh Kumari3, Navkiran Kaur4, Saryu Gupta5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
2 Senior Resident, Department of Radiology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
3 Medical Officer, Department of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
4 Professor, Department of Radiology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Rajesh K Badhan, H. No.-47, SST Nagar, Patiala -147003, Punjab, India.
E-mail: rkbadhan@yahoo.co.in
Abstract

Introduction

Pulmonary tuberculosis has atypical radiological manifestations in patients with underlying immunocompromised disease like diabetes and human immunodeficient virus infection. Computed tomography has important role in such patients for early diagnosis of disease and management to minimize complication.

Aim

To evaluate and compare the computed tomography chest features of pulmonary tuberculosis in between immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent patients.

Materials and Methods

This cross-divtional study was conducted in the hospital on newly diagnosed 60 pulmonary tuberculosis patients of which 30 patients had no underlying disease (Immunocompetent Group) and 30 patients had diabetes mellitus or were human immunodeficiency virus seropositive (Immunocompromised Group). CT scan of chest were evaluated for each patient.

Results

In immunocompetent patients, 36.7% had radiologically atypical presentation,90% had nodular opacities, 73.3% had consolidation, 23.3% had lymphadenopathy, 60% had cavitation and cavitatory lesion were single in 94.4% patients. Isolated upper lung field were involved in 60% patients. In immunocompromised patients 76.7% had radiologically atypical presentation, 66.7% had nodular opacities, 46.7% had consolidation, 63.3% had lymphadenopathy, 20% had cavitation and cavitatory lesions were multiple in 60% patients. Isolated lower lung field were involved in 23.3% patients.

Conclusion

We concluded that immunocompromised patients have more atypical involvement of lung fields, higher prevalence of lymphadenopathy as compared to immunocompetent patients. Diabetic patients have multiple cavitatory lesions as compared to non-diabetic patients. HIV seropositive patients have more prevalence of lymphadenopathy as compared to HIV seronegative patients.

Introduction

Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) is a specific infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. TB is one of the major public health problems in the developing countries like India.

TB has experienced resurgence in the world since the pandemic of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). HIV infection alters the cell mediated immunity and increases the risk of progression of latent tuberculosis infection to active tuberculosis disease [1]. In HIV positive patients with CD4 counts <200/mm3, the features of pulmonary tuberculosis are often atypical [2]. Diabetics are more prone to TB due to decreased immunity [3]. Diabetes mellitus and active tuberculosis intensifies each other and combination of these two diseases forms a lethal combination [4].

Radiology remains one of the most important diagnostic modalities of tuberculosis infection. Radiological manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis are dependent on several host factors, including underlying immune status. Impaired host immunity like HIV infection, diabetes mellitus etc., have been regarded as a predisposing factor in tuberculosis [5]. Endobronchial spread of disease, cavitatory lesions and lymphadenopathy can be easily detected by Computed Tomography (CT). Pleural effusion and bronchopleural fistula can also be detected in early stages [6]. The most common CT findings of reactivation pulmonary TB are centrilobular small nodules, branching linear and nodular opacities present as ‘tree-in-bud’ sign, patchy or lobular areas of consolidation, and cavitation. Cavitation usually indicates active disease [7].

This study was conducted to determine the CT findings of pulmonary tuberculosis and to compare the radiological presentation of pulmonary TB between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiodiagnosis and Department of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India, from November 2011 to October 2013. The permission to conduct the study was taken from Institutional Ethical Committee. This study was conducted on 60 pulmonary tuberculosis patients after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were sputum smear positive for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB). These 60 patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients each as immunocompromised group and immunocompetent group. In immunocompromised group, out of 30 patients, 15 were diabetic and 15 were HIV positive. In the immunocompetent group 30 patients who were not having any other underlying disease with pulmonary tuberculosis were considered. CT chest findings of immunocompromised patients were compared with immunocompetent patients. All these patients after obtaining their consent were subjected to detailed clinical history and investigations as per performa.

Sputum smear examination for acid fast bacilli was done as per Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) guidelines [8]. Patients were considered to have diabetes if they were already a diagnosed case of DM at the time of hospital admission or were found to have two or more fasting blood glucose levels greater than 126 mg% or random blood glucose levels more than 200 mg% or values more than 200 mg% after two hours of 75 gram of oral glucose (GTT). The patients who were tested positive for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antigens with different ELISA kits as per NACO guidelines were taken as HIV infected. CD4 count was estimated at the same point and patient having CD4 count less than 200/mm3 were included in study group.

Pulmonary TB patients of less than 15 years of age, sputum smear negative patients and antitubercular treatment failure patients were excluded on the basis of history, clinical and physical examination.

Spiral CT scans of chest (Siemens 6 slice Somatom Emotion CT machine) were obtained with slice acquisition thickness of 8 mm and reconstruction interval of 8 mm from the level of 2 cm superior to lung apices up to the diaphragm. Non-ionic water soluble, 50-70 ml contrast media of strength 300 mg/ml was used in all the patients. CT scan images were viewed in lung window (level 700 HU; width 1,500 HU), mediastinal window (level 30-50 HU; width 350-500 HU) and bone window (level 2400 HU; width 200 HU).

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative and qualitative data were expressed as median [inter-quartile (IQ) range] and percentages, respectively. Qualitative variables were compared using Pearson Chi-square test. A ’p’-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data was compiled and analysed using Epi info and SPSS 16.0 version software.

Results

In present study, out of 30 immunocompromised tuberculosis patients, 21(70%) patients were males and 9(30%) patients were females. Out of 30 immunocompetent patients, 16(53.3%) patients were males and 14(46.7%) patients were females.

Age distribution of the patients included in both the groups is tabulated in [Table/Fig-1].

Age distribution of study group.

Age(in years)Immunocompromised Group(n=30)Immunocompetent Group(n=30)Total
No.(%age)No.(%age)No.(%age)
20-4011(36.7%)9(30.0%)20(33.3%)
41-6015(50.0%)11(36.7%)26(43.3%)
>604(13.3%)10(33.3%)14(23.3%)

The CT findings of the patients included in both the groups are tabulated in [Table/Fig-2]. Among 30 patients of immunocompromised group 23 (76.7%) were presented with radiologically atypical presentation. Lymphadenopathy was more prevalent in immunocompromised cases as compared to immunocompetent cases (63.3% versus 23.3%). There was no significant difference among both groups for milliary TB and pleural effusion.

CT findings of pulmonary tuberculosis patients.

CT Patterns and FindingsImmunocompromised(n=30)Immunocompetent(n=30)p value
No. (%)No. (%)
Atypical presentation23 (76.7)11 (36.7)0.002*
Nodular Opacities20 (66.7)27 (90.0)0.028*
Consolidation14 (46.7)22 (73.3)0.035*
Cavitation6 (20.0)18 (60.0)0.002*
Milliary Tuberculosis2 (6.7)1 (3.3)0.554#
Lmphadenopathy19 (63.3)7 (23.3)0.002*
Pleural Effusion8 (26.7)5 (16.7)0.347#

Pearson Chi-square test applied.* - Significant, # - Non Significant


Though, number of cavities were more in immunocompetent patients than immunocompromised patients (18 versus 6) but they were multiple in immunocompromised patients (3/6) than in immunocompetent patients (1/18) which was statistically significant. Among six immunocompromised patients cavities were more in DM patients than HIV patients (5 versus 1) [Table/Fig-3a,b].

Number of cavities in DM versus immunocompetent group.

Number of cavitiesDM(n=15)No. (%)Immunocompetent (n=30)No. (%)Test used
Patients with Cavities5(33.3%)18(60%)Pearson Chi- Square = 8.074p value = 0.004
Single cavity2(40%)17(94.4%)
Multiple cavities3(60%)1(5.6%)

Axial CECT chest lung window of a diabetic pulmonary tuberculosis patient. A bizarre shaped cavitatory lesion seen in the left lower lobe.

Lymphadenopathy was more prevalent in immunocompromised cases as compare to immunocompetent cases (19 versus 7). Among 19 immunocompromised patients lymphadenopathy was more prevalent in pulmonary tuberculosis-HIV patients as compared to DM patients (11 versus 8). As such lymphadenopathy was significantly higher in TB-HIV patients than immunocompetent patients (73.3% versus 23.3%) [Table/Fig-4a,b].

Lymphadenopathy in HIV versus immunocompetent group.

LymphadenopathyHIV(n=15)Immunocompetent(n=30)Test used
No. (%)No. (%)
Present11(73.3)7(23.3)Pearson Chi-Square = 10.417p value= 0.001
Absent4(26.7)23(76.7)

Axial CECT chest mediastinal window of HIV seropositive pulmonary tuberculosis patient. Well defined lymph nodes with central hypodense area seen in the precarinal region with right pleural effusion.

The involvement of different lung fields in both the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups with pulmonary TB is given in [Table/Fig-5a,b]. Isolated lower lung field involvement was statistically significant in immunocompromised group as compared to immunocompetent group (23.3% versus 6.7%).

Involvement of lung fields in pulmonary tuberculosis.

Disease DistributionImmunocompromised Group (n=30)Immunocompetent Group(n=30)
No. (%)No. (%)
Isolated Upper Lung Field6(20.0)18(60.0)
Isolated Lower Lung Field7 (23.3)2(6.7)
Middle Lung Lobe6(20.0)2 (6.7)
Multilobar11(36.7)8 (26.7)

Pearson Chi-Square 11.251, p-value 0.01


Axial CECT lung window of HIV positive pulmonary tuberculosis patient. Multiple air space nodules getting confluent at places forming patchy opacities in bilateral lung parenchyma (Right middle lobe, lingular lobe and left lower lobe).

Isolated lower lung field involvement was statistically significant in diabetic group as compared to immunocompetent group (26.7% versus 6.7%). Isolated upper lung fields were involved more in immunocompetent group (60.0%) than in diabetic group (13.3%). [Table/Fig-6a,b].

Involvement of lung field-DM Vs immunocompetent group.

Distribution of DiseaseDM Group (n=15)Immunocompetent Group(n=30)
No. (%)No. (%)
Isolated Upper Lung Field2(13.3)18(60.0)
Isolated Lower Lung Field4(26.7)2(6.7)
Middle Lung Lobe1(6.7)2(6.7)
Multilobar8(53.3)8 (26.7)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.900, p-value 0.019


Axial CECT lung window shows predominantly lower lung field involvement in a diabetic tuberculosis patient.

Discussion

The present study was carried out to understand the influence of underlying diseases like HIV and DM on radiological manifestations of sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients.

Patients having HIV and DM have an increased risk of tuberculosis. Both these diseases adversely affect pulmonary tuberculosis and the radiological manifestations and management differ from situations where none of them exist in pulmonary tuberculosis patients [9].

The radiological pattern of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV positive patients differs from those in HIV negative patients.

Pattern

Regarding the lung involvement, our study shows immunocompromised patients have atypical radiological findings of diseased lung in 23 (76.7%) cases, whereas, in immunocompetent cases atypical involvement of lung was in 11 (36.7%) patients only which were statistically significant. This is comparable to the study done by San KE et al., [10] who observed 67 (83.8%) patients with atypical pattern of disease in HIV positive patients. In HIV positive patients tuberculosis presents in atypical pattern, thus, confusing its presence with other opportunistic infections. Haramati LB et al., [11] observed atypical infiltrates (55% versus 10%) significantly more frequently in HIV positive patients than HIV negative patients. The study by Badie BM et al., [12] also observed that atypical radiological appearance of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV positive subjects was common and mostly related to the low level of patient’s immune system. In case group, 80% patients presented with atypical involvement as compared to 31.7% in control group. Jabbar A et al., [13] observed lower lung fields were most frequently involved, followed by the upper and middle fields.

Nodular Opacities

Nodular opacities were present in 66.7% immunocompromised patients and 90% immunocompetent patients in our study, which was statistically significant. This was comparable to the study done by Leung AN et al., [14] who observed nodular opacities in 81% of tuberculosis-HIV positive patients and in 90% of HIV negative tuberculosis patients. de Almeida LA et al., [15] observed that 35.5% patients presented with ill-defined nodular opacities with centrilobular distribution. Naseem et al [16] observed centrilobular nodules (92%) was the most common CT finding in new tuberculosis cases.

Consolidation

In our study consolidation was present in 46.7% patients of immunocompromised group and in 73.3% patients of immunocompetent group and difference was statistically significant. Our study is comparable with Leung AN et al., [14], who observed that parenchymal consolidation was observed in 43% HIV positive and 69% HIV negative patients.

Cavitation

Our study found cavitation in immunocompromised group was 20% whereas, in immunocompetent group it was found in 60% patients. Our study is in concordance with the study done by Haramati LB et al., [11] where they showed that HIV negative patients had cavitation significantly more frequent than HIV positive patients (52% versus 18%). Leung AN et al., [14] also observed cavitation in 19% HIV-seropositive patients and in 55% HIV-seronegative patients.

Cavitation in Diabetes Mellitus

In our study we found that among immunocompromised group cavitations were found in 33.3% diabetic patients and out of these multiple cavities were found in 60% patients. In immunocompetent group single cavities were found in 94.4% patients. Ikezoe J et al., [17] found that in diabetic or immunocompromised patients with active tuberculosis, multiplicity of cavities was present in 44% patients. In study done by Inayat N et al., [18] main radiological presentation was cavitation which was seen in 20% in TB group as compared to 25% in TB-DM group. Tatar D et al., [19] detected higher rates of smear positivity and a greater incidence of cavity disease in DM cases. Thus, a higher smear-positivity rate is likely to be associated with greater cavity formation and extensive pulmonary damage due to DM. Our study correlates with the above mentioned findings because in our study group also, only sputum positive patients were included.

Lymphadenopathy

In present study, lymphadenopathy was in 19 immunocompromised patients and seven immunocompetent patients and the difference was statistically significant. Out of these 19 patients of immunocompromised group, lymphadenopathy was present in 73.3% of HIV positive patients and rest was in diabetic patients. Our study is in concordance with the study conducted by Haramati LB et al., [11] where they found that HIV positive patients had mediastinal lymphadenopathy (60% versus 23%) significantly more frequent than HIV negative patients. de Almeida LA et al., [15] also found 68.8% patients with mediastinal or hilar lymph node enlargement were AIDS patients with pulmonary TB.

Distribution of Disease

Pulmonary tuberculosis patients characteristically show radiographic evidence of apical abnormalities of lung. It is mainly attributed to oxygen rich environment in the lung apices but in fact may result from diminished apical lymphatic drainage. In our study, isolated upper lung fields were involved in 60% patients of immunocompetent group and in 20% patients of immunocompromised group. An isolated lower lung field was involved in 23.3% patients in immunocompromised group and in 6.7% patients in Immunocompetent group. Multilobar involvement in immunocompromised group was in 36.7% patients and in immunocompetent group was in 26.7% patients. Study conducted by Singla R et al., [20] concluded that there is higher involvement of lower lung fields in diabetic patients than immunocompetent patients (23.5% versus 2.4%). Study done by Perez-Guzmen C et al., [21] concluded that lower lung field lesions are significantly higher in tuberculosis patients with DM than tuberculosis patients without DM. (19% versus 7%). Ahmad Z et al., [22] in their study concluded that in HIV-TB cases lower lung fields were more involved than non-HIV TB patients (46.15% versus 9.75%).

Limitation

Few immunocompromised patients had deranged renal function tests, so contrast enhanced CT could not be performed in such cases.

Conclusion

HIV seropositive tuberculosis patients have an impaired host cell mediated response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, so they have a lower prevalence of consolidation, cavitation and nodules however, they have a higher prevalence of hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Diabetic patients with tuberculosis have a higher prevalence of nonsegmental distribution and of multiplicity of cavities. Our study highlights the impact of HIV and diabetes on radiological manifestation of pulmonary tuberculosis which is very atypical on presentation. Thus, active case finding by interpreting atypical radiological manifestations amongst people with underlying immunosuppressive diseases has essential role in control of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Pearson Chi-square test applied.* - Significant, # - Non SignificantPearson Chi-Square 11.251, p-value 0.01Pearson Chi-Square 9.900, p-value 0.019

References

[1]Tuberculosis India 2013. RNTCP status report, TB: Burden of the disease in India. Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, NirmanBhawan, New Delhi 2013; 19-20, 43-44. Available at website http://www.tbcindia.org/ pdfs/TB%20India%202010.pdf last access date Aug 16, 2017  [Google Scholar]

[2]Sharma SK, Mohan A, Endocrine implications of tuberculosis Tuberculosis 2004 1New DelhiJayPee Brothers:386-95.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Guptan A, Shah A, Tuberculosis and diabetes: An Appraisal Ind J Tub 2000 47:3  [Google Scholar]

[4]Lata H, Kant S, Mishra AK, Natu SM, Verma NS An association between the poorglycemic level and severity of pulmonary tuberculosis. G.J.P and A Sc and Tech 2012 02(2):1-10.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Im JG, Itoh H, Han MC, CT of pulmonary tuberculosis Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995 16:420-34.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Jeong YJ, Lee KS, Pulmonary tuberculosis: Up-to-Date Imaging and Management AJR 2008 191:834-44.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Haaga JR, Dogra VS, Forsting M, Gilkeson RC, Ha HK, Sundram M, Imaging of the Chest: CT and MRI of the Whole Body Elsevier 2009 5(1):906-911.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Technical and Operational Guidelines for Tuberculosis Control, 2005, Central Tuberculosis Divison, Directorate General of Health Services. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, NirmanBhawan, New Delhi.215; 12-21. Available at website http//health.bih.nic.in/DOCS/Guidelines-TB-Control.pdf  [Google Scholar]

[9]Kotokey RK, Bhattacharya DN, Das P, Azad AK, De A, Study of efficacy of DOTS in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with associated diabetes Lung India 2007 24:58-60.  [Google Scholar]

[10]San KE, Muhamad M, Pulmonary Tuberculosis in HIV infection: The Relationship of the Radiographic Appearance to CD4 T-Lymphocyte Count Malays J Med Sci 2001 8(1):34-40.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Haramati LB, Jenny-Avital ER, Alterman DD, Effect of HIV status on chest radiographic and CT findings in patients with tuberculosis Clin Radiol 1997 52(1):31-35.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Badie BM, Mehran M, Izadi M, Alijaani MAN, Rasoolinejad M, Comparing radiological features of pulmonary tuberculosis with and without HIV infection J AIDS Clinic Res 2012 3(10):188  [Google Scholar]

[13]Jabbar A, Hussain SF, Khan AA, Clinical characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in adult Pakistani patients with co-existing diabetes mellitus East Mediterr Health J 2006 12(5):522-27.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Leung AN, Brauner MW, Gamsu G, Cabanne NM, Romdhane HB, Carette MF, Pulmonary tuberculosis: Comparison of CT Findings in HIV-Seropositive and HIV-Seronegative Patients Radiology 1996 198:687-91.  [Google Scholar]

[15]de Almeida LA, Barba MF, Moreira AF, Bombarda S, de Felice AS, Calore EE, Computed tomography findings of pulmonary tuberculosis in adult AIDS patients Radiol Bras 2011 44(1):13-19.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Nassem A, Wasim S, Shamrez K, High resolution computed tomographic pattens in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis Journal of The College of Pysicians and surgeons Pakistan 2008 18(11):703-7.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Ikezoe J, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Kohno N, Tomiyama N, Kozuka T, CT appearance of pulmonary tuberculosis in diabetic and immunocompromised patients:Comparison with patients who had no underlying disease AJR 1992 159:1175-79.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Inayat N, Shah RH, Hamza A, Comparative study of lower lung field tuberculosis with diabetics and non-diabetics by radiographs Supplement Chest Medicine 2010 16(1):125-27.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Tatar D, Senol G, Alptekin S, Karakurum C, Aydin M, Coskunol I, Tuberculosis in diabetics: features in an endemic area Jpn J Infect Dis 2009 62(6):423-27.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Singla R, Khan N, Al-Sharif N, Ai-Sayegh MO, Shaikh MA, Osman MM, Influence of diabetes on manifestations and treatment outcome of pulmonary TB patients Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006 10(1):74-79.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Perez-Guzmen C, torres-Cruz A, Villarreal-Velarde H, Salazar-Lezama MA, A typical radiological images of pulmonary tuberculosis in 192 diabetic patients: a comparative study Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001 5(5):455-61.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Ahmad Z, Shameem M, Manifestation of Tuberculosis I HIV Infected Patients JIACM 2005 6(4):302-5.  [Google Scholar]