JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Biochemistry Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30272.10528
Year : 2017 | Month : Sep | Volume : 11 | Issue : 9 Full Version Page : BC01 - BC04

A Comparative Study of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Metabolic Variables in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with and without Nephropathy

Abid K Shaheer1, Jithesh K Tharayil2, Parvathi W Krishna3

1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Biochemistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Calicut, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India.
3 Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India.


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Abid K Shaheer, MM House, Kuniyil, Kizhuparamba, Malappuram-673639, Kerala, India.
E-mail: abidshaheer@gmail.com
Abstract

Introduction

Diabetic nephropathy is a serious chronic complication of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) which impairs the quality of life, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is an acute phase reactant which acts as a non-specific systemic marker of inflammation.

Aim

To find out the relationship between serum hs-CRP and metabolic variables in Type 2 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy.

Materials and Methods

The study group consists of 96 subjects that include non-diabetic healthy controls, Type 2 diabetic patients without any complications and patients with diabetic nephropathy. The study group was composed of both genders, aged 31-70 years, who reported after 10-12 hours overnight fasting; then, venous blood and fresh urine samples were collected, in the morning from all the study subjects. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Independent t-test was used to compare between the groups and Chi square test was used to find out the relationship between serum hs-CRP and metabolic variables.

Results

The results showed a significantly (p<0.05) increasing trend of serum hs-CRP with the degree of microalbumin excretion and the severity of nephropathy in Type 2 diabetic patients. The result showed a significant (p<0.05) relationship between hs-CRP and the metabolic variables like Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), Post Prandial Blood Glucose (PPBG), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG), LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C), TC:HDL-Cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and no significance (p>0.05) between hs-CRP and HDL-Cholesterol in both diabetic and diabetic nephropathy subjects.

Conclusion

Hs-CRP was strongly associated with the metabolic variables and predictors of cardiovascular risk in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without nephropathy. The hs-CRP might be considered as a predictor or illness indicator for the development of nephropathy and cardiovascular risk in Type 2 diabetic patients.

Keywords

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus may be defined as a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia which leads to chronic complications such as diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular diseases. These complications usually appear in the second decade of the hyperglycemia and the risk increases with the severity of hyperglycemia [1]. Incidence of Type 2 diabetes is enhancing globally and has reached wide ranging proportions in many countries. The recent evaluation by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) revealed the number of people affected by the diabetes mellitus was 382 million which is predicted to increase to 592 million by 2035. IDF also estimated that about 8.3% of world population and 65.1 million of adult people in India are affected by diabetes [2]. A large body of data showed that the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes varies considerably between urban and rural populations and reveal the prevalence of diabetes has increased to 18.6% in urban and 9.2% in rural population in India with significant regional variations [3].

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the chronic complications of Type 2 diabetes mellitus which impair the quality of life leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Microalbuminuria is the continuous elevation of albumin excretion in urine in a range of 20 mg/L-200 mg/L in early morning urine [4,5]. Microalbumin is one of the independent risk factor for vascular diseases like cardiovascular disease and is integrated with endothelial dysfunction and chronic inflammation [6]. Innate immune system and low grade inflammation are significantly associated to the incidence and severity of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications [7,8]. The hs-CRP is an acute phase reactant which acts as a non-specific systemic marker of inflammation. It is a pentameric, globular protein synthesized by liver and is considered as an effective marker for long term risk assessment [9-11]. Low grade systemic inflammation may be used to predict the onset of cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes mellitus [12,13]. Obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia along with altered level of lipoproteins are associated with glycation, oxidation and insulin resistance in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endothelial dysfunction contributes to the development of cardiovascular disease via vascular tone dysregulation, growth, thrombogenicity, and inflammation. Hemostatic and inflammatory biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction like CRP have been associated with cardiovascular disease [14,15].

The present study was carried out to find out the relationship between serum hs-CRP and metabolic variables in Type 2 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy. The study signifies an increasing trend of serum hs-CRP with the degree of microalbumin excretion and the severity of nephropathy in Type 2 diabetic patients. In addition, microalbumin is one of the risk factor for cardiovascular disease and might be linked with chronic inflammation which leads to the alteration in the serum hs-CRP levels. This study adds the importance of measuring hs-CRP as a routine test in Type 2 diabetic patients to reduce the subsequent risk of diabetic nephropathy.

Materials and Methods

The current pilot, case-control study has been conducted in MES Medical College and Hospital, Kerala, India, during May 2009 to October 2009. Ethical approval was taken from Institutional Ethical Committee and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The blood and urine samples were collected from 96 subjects which include both male and female. The study groups include 32 non-diabetic healthy controls, 32 Type 2 diabetic patients without any complications and 32 diabetic nephropathy patients. The sample size was considered as per convenient sampling and availability of data in the short duration of the study. Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus within age group of 31-70 years were reported after 10-12 hours overnight fast and 3 ml of venous blood sample from the study subjects were collected for the analysis. Then, 1 ml of blood sample was transferred to grey coloured blood collection vial that contain sodium fluoride-potassium oxalate mixture and was used for fasting plasma glucose estimation. In addition, 2 ml of blood sample was transferred to red coloured vial that contain clot activator and was used for serum determination. The subjects reported again after two hours of heavy breakfast and 1 ml of blood was collected in grey vial for post prandial blood glucose estimation. The blood samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for the separation of plasma or serum and transferred to microcentrifuge tubes for further analysis.

Inclusion criteria: Type 2 diabetic patients without any complications, Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy and non-diabetic healthy controls.

Exclusion criteria: Type 1 diabetic patients, gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis, smokers, alcoholics, chronic illness and patients on treatment with lipid lowering agents, anti-inflammatory drugs, multivitamin and aspirin were excluded from the study.

BMI was calculated by dividing weight (in kg) with height (in m2). SBP was measured by Sphygmomanometer. Waist and hip circumferences were measured to calculate Waist/hip ratio. The separated samples were analysed for FBG, PPBG, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C and creatinine on fully automated analyser (VITROS 250 Chemistry Analyser, Johnson and Johnson Company) with the reagents supplied by Johnson and Johnson Company. VITROS 250 Chemistry System is based on the Dry slide Technology. The thin film dry slide is the key element of VITROS technology.

Serum hs-CRP was measured by Quantia-CRP-US turbidimetric immunoassay kit supplied by Coral Clinical Systems. Quantia-CRP-US assay kit is based on the principle of agglutination reaction. The test specimen is mixed with Quantia-CRP US® latex reagent, then activation buffer was allowed to react. Presence of CRP in the test specimen results in the formation of an insoluble complex producing a turbidity, which is measured at 540 nm. The fresh, early morning urine samples collected from the study subjects were used for microalbumin estimation by a solid phase, sandwich-format quantitative immunometric assay using NycoCard® READER II. When the diluted urine flows through the membrane coated, immobilized antibodies capture the albumin molecules. Albumin trapped on the membrane will bind the gold-antibody conjugate and unbound conjugate is removed from the membrane by the washing solution. The paper layer underneath the membrane absorbs excess liquid. Due to the bond gold particles, the membrane appears purple and the intensity of the colour is proportional to the albumin concentration present in the sample. All the urine samples were screened for urine protein by heat coagulation test [16]. The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated by MDRD GFR equation based on creatinine and participant characteristics.

eGFR (mL/minute/1.73 m2) = 186 x (Creatinine / 88.4)-1.154 x (Age)-0.203 x (0.742, if female) x (1.210, if black) [17].

Statistical Analysis

The results of the study were indicated as mean±SD. Data were analysed using SPSS version 18.0 and p-value of <0.05 was considered as the cut off level for significance. Independent t-test was used to compare between the groups. In addition, Chi square test was used to find out the relationship between serum hs-CRP and metabolic variables in the study subjects.

Results

Demographic data, clinical characteristics and biochemical variables of the study subjects are shown in [Table/Fig-1]. The mean age of Type 2 diabetic subjects without any complications was 52.8±8.8 years (men: 51.5±9.1 years, women: 54.1±8.5 years). The mean age of the diabetic nephropathy subjects was 54.7±7.0 years (men: 54.8±7.2 years, women: 54.7±7.1 years). Among the cases, the gender representation varies widely in different age groups. For detailed analysis, age was grouped into different categories. The age and gender wise distribution of the study cases are shown in [Table/Fig-2].

Demographic data, clinical characteristics and biochemical variables of the study subjects (Independent t-test).

VariablesNon-diabetichealthy controls(n=32)Type 2 diabeticpatients withoutcomplications(n=32)Type 2diabeticpatients withnephropathy(n=32)
Age (years)24.6 ± 2.052.8 ± 8.854.7 ± 7.0
BMI (kg/m2)22.2±3.724.6±5.723.3±4.7
SBP (mm Hg)122.1±12.2140.6 ± 18.4*151.7 ± 7.92*
Waist-hip ratio0.87 ± 0.050.92 ± 0.08*0.93 ± 0.06*
hs-CRP (mg/L)0.31 ± 0.472.53 ± 0.71*5.15 ± 1.27*
Microalbumin (mg/L)5.9 ± 1.1714.8 ± 3.94*158.9 ± 38.97*
FBG (mg/dL)94.65 ± 5.87169.96 ± 23.71*228.18 ± 33.29*
PPBG (mg/dL)127.84 ± 13.75279.03 ± 45.35*395.71 ± 46.99*
TC (mg/dL)177.31 ± 12.10205.71 ± 22.76*234.68 ± 25.77*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)122.78 ± 19.63198.40 ± 22.31*222.25 ± 32.31*
HDL-C (mg/dL)54.90 ± 2.6542.56 ± 3.3034.56 ± 2.77
LDL-C (mg/dL)97.85 ± 11.03123.47 ± 20.22*155.67 ± 24.52*
TC: HDL-C ratio3.23 ± 0.234.86 ± 0.67*6.84 ± 1.01*
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.57 ± 0.111.36 ± 0.192.03 ± 0.30*
eGFR (mL/minute/1.73 m2165.1 ± 42.752.5 ± 13.9*32.4 ± 7.6*

* Significant (p <0.05)

hs-CRP: High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose, PPBG: Post Prandial Blood Glucose, TC: Total Cholesterol, HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.


Age and gender wise distribution of the study cases.

Age(years)Type 2 diabetic patients without complications(n=32)Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy(n=32)
TotalMaleFemaleTotalMaleFemale
n%n%n%n%n%n%
31-40412.5375.0125.013.11100.000
41-50825.0337.5562.5825.0337.5562.5
51-601340.6646.2753.81340.6753.8646.2
61-70721.9457.1342.91031.3550.0550.0

* Expressed in number (n) and percentage (%)


Mean hs-CRP level of the diabetic and diabetic nephropathy cases were significantly high (p<0.05) as compared to the hs-CRP levels in controls. A significant difference was observed (p<0.05) in mean FBG level in diabetic nephropathy patients and Type 2 diabetic patients when compared with controls. A significant difference (p<0.05) in mean PPBG level of diabetic nephropathy patients and diabetic patients as compared to controls were also observed. In this study, significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in mean TC, LDL-C and TG levels of diabetic patients and diabetic nephropathy patients as compared to non-diabetic subjects. A significant difference (p<0.05) in mean microalbumin level was observed in diabetic and diabetic nephropathy when compared to healthy controls. A significant difference (p<0.05) in mean creatinine level of diabetic nephropathy patients and no significant difference (p>0.05) in diabetic patients as compared to controls was also observed. The study also showed a significant decrease (p<0.05) in the mean level of eGFR in both diabetic and diabetic nephropathy subjects.

Association of hs-CRP with biochemical variables in Type 2 diabetic patients without any complications and with nephropathy are shown in [Table/Fig-3,4] respectively. The result shows a significant (p<0.05) relationship between hs-CRP and metabolic variables like Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), Postprandial Blood Glucose (PPBG), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) and TC:HDL-C ratio in both diabetic and diabetic nephropathy subjects. Serum hs-CRP was also associated with serum creatinine concentration (p<0.05) in diabetic nephropathy, but no association was observed in Type 2 diabetic patients without any complications. No significant relationship was observed between hs-CRP and HDL-C (p>0.05) in both diabetic and diabetic nephropathy subjects. A significant association was observed between hs-CRP and eGFR (p<0.05) in both diabetic and diabetic nephropathy subjects.

Association of hs-CRP with biochemical variables in Type 2 diabetic patients without any complications (Chi square test applied).

VariablesChi square test valuedfSig. (2-tailed)
Microalbumin (mg/L)14.89130.002*
FBG (mg/dL)8.63120.013*
PPBG (mg/dL)18.90330.001*
TC (mg/dL)7.15810.007*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)5.77610.016*
HDL-C (mg/dL)1.15710.282**
LDL-C (mg/dL)5.58410.018*
TC: HDL-C ratio7.99730.046*
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.92210.337**
eGFR (mL/minute/1.73 m2)21.33250.001*

* Significant, ** Not significant

df: degree of freedom, FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose, PPBG: Post Prandial Blood Glucose, TC: Total Cholesterol, HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.


Association of hs-CRP with biochemical variables in Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy (Chi square test applied).

VariablesChi square test valuedfSig. (2-tailed)
Microalbumin (mg/L)10.63340.031*
FBG (mg/dL)13.43140.009*
PPBG (mg/dL)25.80680.001*
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)15.45840.004*
Triglycerides (mg/dL)13.02140.011*
HDL-C (mg/dL)4.89420.087**
LDL-C (mg/dL)21.46860.002*
TC: HDL-C ratio29.32140.001*
Creatinine (mg/dL)10.01440.04*
eGFR (mL/minute/1.73 m2)17.57640.001*

* Significant, ** Not significant

df: degree of freedom, FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose, PPBG: Post Prandial Blood Glucose, TC: Total Cholesterol, HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.


Discussion

Our findings indicate that the concentration of serum hs-CRP was elevated in Type 2 diabetic and diabetic nephropathy patients than non-diabetic controls. There may be a significant relationship between hs-CRP and complications of Type 2 diabetes mellitus through the acute phase response. Stehouwer CD et al., Jager A et al., and Samia M et al., reported the relationship between inflammation, Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications [18-20]. A high level of inflammatory plasma proteins leads to the increased incidence of cardiovascular risk especially in Type 2 diabetic patients. An increased incidence of vascular complications of Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been observed among subjects with high levels of inflammatory markers [18,19]. Measurement of markers of inflammation might be helpful for the assessment of the vascular risk in Type 2 diabetic patients. Inflammation is linked to the pathogenesis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin resistance and hyperglycemia are also promoting inflammation by increased oxidative stress and that may link diabetes mellitus to the development of atherosclerosis [20].

Serum hs-CRP is one of the factors as a biomarker for predicting cardiovascular events as serum hs-CRP is correlated with the cardiovascular risk and elevations of other biomarkers are found to be significantly associated with vascular events. It was found that study subjects with high CRP and low LDL-C were at higher risk than those in the low CRP and high LDL-C group. Even after adjustment for age, smoking, blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, HDL-C and LDL-C levels, CRP remain as an independent prognostic risk factor. These observations indicate the need for physicians to consider CRP in one of the biomarkers [21]. The best characterized inflammatory biomarker is C-Reactive Protein (CRP). Sridevi D et al., found that the CRP levels are elevated in Type 2 diabetic patients with the metabolic syndrome and hence, hs-CRP is added as a diagnostic criterion for metabolic syndrome [22]. A study on hs-CRP levels and glycated haemoglobin by King DE et al., indicate the relationship between hs-CRP and glycaemic control [23].

Mahajan A et al. found a relationship between C-reactive protein and hyperglycemia in urban Northern Indian Type 2 diabetic patients which is an agreement with our study [24]. Lima LM et al., reported that hyperglycemia is an associated factor to the increased serum CRP levels in uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes subjects [11]. Study on inflammatory markers by Waheed P et al., showed the relationship between dyslipidemia, C-reactive protein and low-grade inflammation in diabetic subjects [25]. Mojahedi MJ et al., reported that microalbuminuria is accompanied by elevated hs-CRP, suggesting activation of inflammatory pathways in the progression of cardiovascular and renal disease in Type 2 diabetic patients which is an agreement with our findings [26]. The inflammatory response may be due to microvascular or macrovascular complications following Type 2 diabetes mellitus, although the exact mechanisms are still not well understood. Serum hs-CRP level is elevated in Type-2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy in comparison with non-diabetic healthy controls. The results of the present study showed that the serum hs-CRP concentration is strongly related to Type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy.

Limitation

A very small sample size is an evident limitation of this study which is due to the limited availability of data within the short duration of the study. In addition, the consent from the patients was not easy as many of them were unaware of the importance of the study and hence such cases were rejected to participate in the study. Randomized controlled trials in Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy and/or cardiovascular disease are recommended to generate more evidences to support the findings. Further research is required to observe whether there is a beneficial strategy to reduce the risk of diabetic nephropathy in Type 2 diabetic patients with high levels of hs-CRP.

Conclusion

The main finding of this study is that high level of serum hs-CRP is strongly related to the metabolic variables and predictors of cardiovascular risk in Type 2 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy. The study strongly suggests the importance of measuring the level of serum acute-phase proteins in the diagnosis and early detection of complications of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. There may be an association between hs-CRP and complications through the acute phase response. The hs-CRP might be considered as a predictor or illness indicator for the development of diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetic patients.

* Significant (p <0.05)hs-CRP: High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose, PPBG: Post Prandial Blood Glucose, TC: Total Cholesterol, HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.* Expressed in number (n) and percentage (%)* Significant, ** Not significantdf: degree of freedom, FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose, PPBG: Post Prandial Blood Glucose, TC: Total Cholesterol, HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.* Significant, ** Not significantdf: degree of freedom, FBG: Fasting Blood Glucose, PPBG: Post Prandial Blood Glucose, TC: Total Cholesterol, HDL-C: High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.

References

[1]Shivananda NB, Geetha B, Relationship between sialic acid and metabolic variables in Indian type 2 diabetic patients Lipids Health Dis 2005 4:15  [Google Scholar]

[2]Guariguata L, Nolan T, Beagley T, Linnenkamp U, Jacqmain O, (Editors) The IDF Diabetes Atlas 2013 6th editionInt Diab Feder.s:19-34.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Jayawardena R, Ranasinghe P, Byrne Prevalence and trends of the diabetes epidemic in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Public Health 2012 12:380  [Google Scholar]

[4]Basi S, Fesler P, Mimran A, Lewis JB, Microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes and hypertension. a marker, treatment target, or innocent bystander Diabetes Care 2008 31(4):S194-201.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Cade WT, Diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular diseases in the physical therapy setting Phys Ther 2008 88(11):1322-35.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Stehouwer CD, Smulders YM, Microalbuminuria and risk for cardiovascular disease: analysis of potential mechanisms J Am Soc Nephrol 2006 17(8):2106-11.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Navarro-Gonzalez JF, Mora-Fernandez C, The role of inflammatory cytokines in diabetic nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 2008 19(3):433-42.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Fredric JP, Oxidative stress and inflammation in heart disease: do antioxidants have a role in treatment and/or prevention Int J Inflam 2011 (2011):01-09.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Erin D, Michos Roger S, Blumenthal Prevalence of low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein U.S. Journ Amer Coll Card 2009 53(11):931-35.  [Google Scholar]

[10]Ridker PM, Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardiovascular disease detection and prevention Circulation 2003 107(3):363-69.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Lima LM, Carvalho M, Soares AL, High-sensitivity C-reactive protein in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or high blood pressure Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2007 51(6):956-60.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Duncan BB, Schmidt M, Pankow JS, Low grade systemic inflammation and the development of type 2 diabetes Diabetes 2003 52(7):1799-805.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Shivananda N, Heidi D, Sunita L, Correlation of microalbumin and sialic acid with anthropometric variables in type 2 diabetic patients with and without nephropathy Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008 4(1):243-47.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Lerman A, Zeiher AM, Endothelial function: cardiac events Circulation 2005 111(3):363-68.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events N Engl J Med 2002 347(20):1557-65.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Dissanayake VH, Morgan L, Broughton PF, The urine protein heat coagulation test-a useful screening test for proteinuria in pregnancy in developing countries: a method validation study BJOG 2004 111(5):491-94.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group Ann Intern Med 1999 130(6):461-70.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Stehouwer CD, Gall MA, Twisk JW, Increased urinary albumin excretion, endothelial dysfunction, and chronic low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes: progressive, interrelated, and independently associated with risk of death Diabetes 2002 51(4):1157-65.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Jager A, Hinsbergh VW, Kostense PJ, C-reactive protein and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 are associated with elevated urinary albumin excretion but do not explain its link with cardiovascular risk Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002 22:593-98.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Samia M, Kiran M, Roger SB, The clinical utility of high-sensitivity c-reactive protein in cardiovascular disease and the potential implication of jupiter on current practice guidelines Clin Chem 2009 55(2):219-28.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Ridker PM, Silvertown JD, Inflammation, C - reactive protein, and Atherothrombosis J Periodontol 2008 79(8):1544-51.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Sridevi D, Uma S, Ishwarlal J, Human C-reactive protein and the metabolic syndrome Curr Opin Lipidol 2009 20(3):182-89.  [Google Scholar]

[23]King DE, Mainous AG, Buchanan TA, C-reactive protein and glycaemic control in adults with diabetes Diabetes Care 2003 26(5):1535-39.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Mahajan A, Tabassum R, Chavali S, High sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and type 2 diabetes in urban North Indians J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009 94(6):2123-27.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Waheed P, Naveed AK, Farooq F, Levels of inflammatory markers and their correlation with dyslipidemia in diabetics J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2009 19(4):207-10.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Mojahedi MJ, Bonakdaran S, Hami M, Elevated serum C-reactive protein level and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Iran J Kidney Dis 2009 3(1):12-16.  [Google Scholar]