JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X
Pathology Section DOI : 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28438.10379
Year : 2017 | Month : Aug | Volume : 11 | Issue : 8 Full Version Page : EC12 - EC15

CD44 Expression in Meningioma and its Correlation with Proliferation Indices

Rasha Ramadan Mostafa1, Rasha Ahmed Khairy2

1Lecturer, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
2Lecturer, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt


NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Rasha Ahmed Khairy, 119 Al Ahram Street, Giza, Egypt.
E-mail: rasha.jawad@kasralainy.edu.eg
Abstract

Introduction

CD44 is a cell adhesion molecule assumed to be related to tumour invasion and metastatic ability and is expressed in variety of tumours including meningiomas.

Aim

To evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of CD44 in variable grades and variants of eningioma and to correlate the results with Ki-67 proliferation index and available clinicopathologic variables.

Materials and Methods

A total of 40 meningioma cases were studied for immunohistochemical expression of CD44 and Ki-67 and correlated with different clinicopathologic variables. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

CD44 was markedly expressed in high grade (II and III) meningioma (81.8%) compared to grade I (18.2%) and that was statistically significant (p<0.001). Ki-67 proliferation activity was significantly correlated with meningioma grade (p<0.001) and brain invasiveness (p=0.033). Moreover, statistically positive correlation (p=0.01) was reported between CD44 and Ki-67 proliferative activity. No statistically significant correlation was detected between CD44 or Ki-67 expression and patients’ age, sex, and tumour recurrence rate (p>0.05).

Conclusion

We concluded that CD44 is a marker of aggressiveness in meningioma as it was significantly highly expressed in grade II and III meningioma and was, positively correlated with higher Ki-67 proliferation indices. Therefore, researches should be carried out to identify the role of CD44 targeted therapy in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas as done in other tumours e.g., breast cancer.

Keywords

Introduction

Meningiomas are most prevalent primary intracranial tumour and spinal intradural neoplasms [1], presenting over one third of all Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours in adults, with the ratio between female: male is 2:1. Imaging studies and autopsy indicate that the incidence of subclinical meningiomas is nearly 3% in the population [2].

Histological grading is considered the most important factor in meningioma prognosis [3]. However, after complete surgical resection of meningiomas, and in spite of bone and dura mater involvement, recurrence occurs in 80% of incomplete surgical resection and 20% of cases with complete surgical resection even in some low grade tumours cases [4]. This has led to study of other factors in order to predict the behavior of meningiomas as use of different immunohistochemical markers for detecting meningioma progression [5].

Among the cell adhesion molecules, CD44 is assumed to be related to tumour invasion and metastatic ability. It was studied on several tumours types, including meningiomas [6]. CD44 is a cell surface glycoprotein receptor which is ligand to hyaluronan; an extracellular matrix molecule, being implicated in matrix mediated cell signaling and in cell-matrix adhesion. It is expressed on almost all human cells. It is important for regulating of cell adhesion, migration, angiogenesis, proliferation and inflammation [7-9].

The studies showed that the expression of anti CD44 antibodies; using immunohistochemical technique in meningiothelial, transitional subtypes and higher grade tumours, was more intense than lower grade of tumours where the expression in such types was highly variable [10-14]. Additionally, the relationship between brain-invasive growth and CD44 expression in meningioma has been addressed by few studies without finding a clear association [10,14].

Also, among these immunohistochemical markers is identification of markers which are responsible for the controlling the cell proliferation. Ki-67 antigen is a non-histone protein marker that is only expressed in the active proliferative phase of the cell cycle, and can be simply examined on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections. Proliferation index estimated by Ki-67 may be used as a way for expecting meningioma behavior [15-19].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of CD44 and Ki-67 in different histological types of meningioma and correlate the results of their expression with various clinicopathologic variables.

Materials and Methods

Study Group

This cross-sectional study was performed at the Pathology department, Kasr Al Ainy Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University from January 2015 to July 2016. It included 40 cases of intracranial meningioma.

The study was conducted in correspondence with the guidelines of the local ethical committee of the faculty of medicine, Cairo University and took the approval of ethical committee.

Cases with deficient clinical data or poorly fixed specimens were not included in the study.

Histopathological Evaluation

Formalin fixed and paraffin embedded blocks were sectioned at 5 µm thickness and examined microscopically using H&E stain to evaluate the histological diagnosis which was performed according to the criteria of the WHO 2016.

Immunohistochemical Procedure of CD44 and Ki-67

The archived 40 paraffin embedded blocks of the meningioma cases were sectioned on adhesive charged microscopic slides, 5 µ sections were obtained. According to Dako standard protocol heat mediated antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer pH 6 in automated water bath (Dako PT link, PT101). The primary antibodies were CD44 Std. /HCAM Ab-4 (#MS-668-R7), (7.0ml), manufactured by: NeoMarkers For Lab Vision Corporation, UK, against CD44 protein and Ki-67, monoclonal antibody, 1:50, DAKO, USA. Immunohistochemical staining was performed in an autostainer (Dako autostainer link 48) using a polymer-based detection system (DakoEnVision™ FLEX, K8000). Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as chromogen and Mayer’s hematoxylin was used as a counter stain, then after the cover slips and DPX mounting medium were used for mounting and preserving sections. All sections were examined by using Olympus BX51 light microscope with 20X and 40X objective eye pieces. The positive control used for CD44 and Ki-67 were tonsillar tissue and a case of invasive duct carcinoma with high Ki-67 proliferation index respectively.

Evaluation of Expression of both CD44 and Ki-67

Immunostaining of CD44 was evaluated semi quantitatively for the presence of membranous or cytoplasmic staining and graded as mild, moderate and marked when the percentage of CD44 positive staining cells was as follows: 0-5%; from 5 to 50% and > 50% respectively [20]. Ki-67 expression was determined as percentage through counting in 100 nuclei in the busiest foci of the tumour.

Cells in areas with necrosis, poor morphology or at the margins of sections were not counted in both markers.

The results of CD44 and Ki-67 immunostaining were correlated with multiple prognostic factors (age, sex, histopathological type, histopathological grade, brain invasion and recurrence).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 was used for statistical analysis. Numerical data were summarized using means and standard deviations. Categorical data were summarized as percentages. Data were explored for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparisons between the two groups were done using the t-test. For categorical variables, differences were analysed with Chi-square (χ2) test and Fisher’s-exact test when appropriate. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between numeric variables. The p-values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The patients’ age ranged from 12 to 75 years with mean age 49.5±14.89 years. Twenty seven patients were females while 13 were males.

CD44 cytoplasmic and membranous immunostaining was graded as mild in 21 cases (52.5%), moderate in 8 cases (20%) and marked in 11 cases (27.5%). Correlation between CD44 expression and clinicopathologic variables is summarized in [Table/Fig-1]. A significant positive correlation was detected between CD44 expression and meningioma grade as marked CD44 expression was detected in 9 cases (81.8%) of high grades II and III compared to 2 cases (18.2%) in Grade I (p<0.001). On the other hand, no significant correlation was detected between CD44 expression and other variables as age, sex, recurrence rate and brain invasion in studied cases (p>0.05).

The correlations of CD44 expression with the clinicopathologic variables in the studied meningioma cases

VariablesTotal no.CD44 expressionp-value
MildModerateMarked
Age≤501911(52.40%)5(62.50%)3(27.30%)0.256
>502110(47.60%)3(37.50%)8(72.70%)
SexFemale2714(66.7%)5(62.5%)8(72.7%)0.889
Male137(33.3%)3(37.5%)3(27.3%)
GradeI2420(95.2%)2(25.0%)2(18.2%)<0.001
II, III161(4.8%)6(75.0%)9(81.8%)
RecurrenceNegative3520(95.2%)6(75.0%)9(81.8%)0.190
Positive51(4.8%)2(25.0%)2(18.2%)
Brain invasionNegative3520(95.2%)6(75.0%)9(81.8%)0.190
Positive51(4.8%)2(25.0%)2(18.2%)

Different histologic variants of meningioma cases were enrolled in this study and correlated with CD44 expression as shown in [Table/Fig-2].

CD44 expression in different histologic variants in the studied meningioma cases;

Histologic variantsCD44 expression
MildModerateMarked
Meningiothelial7(33.30%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Fibroblastic4(19.0%)0(0.00%)1(9.10%)
Transitional6(28.60%)2(25.0%)1(9.10%)
Angiomatous1(4.80%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Microcystic1(4.80%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Psammomatous1(4.80%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Clear cell1(4.80%)0(0.00%)0(0.00%)
Atypical0(0.00%)5(62.50%)7(63.60%)
Anaplastic0(0.00%)1(12.50%)2(18.20%)

The Ki-67 proliferative activity ranged from 0.4% to 30% with average 6.5%. Correlation between Ki-67 expression and clinicopathologic variables is summarized in [Table/Fig-3]. Significant positive correlation was detected between Ki-67 proliferative activity and meningioma grade (p<0.001) and brain invasion (p=0.033). Other variables as age, sex, and, recurrence rate of meningioma didn’t reveal significant correlation with Ki-67 proliferative activity (p>0.05).

The correlation of Ki-67 proliferative activity with clinicopathologic variables in the studied meningioma cases.

VariablesTotal no.Ki-67p-value
MeanSD
Age≤50196.880.835
>50216.37.9
SexFemale275.57.20.248
Male138.68.9
GradeI242.92.2<0.001
II1310.49.4
III319.011.5
RecurrenceNegative355.87.40.109
Positive511.89.9
Brain invasionNegative355.56.80.033
Positive513.511.8

A significant positive correlation was detected between CD44 immunohistochemical expression in meningioma cases and Ki-67 proliferative index as shown in [Table/Fig-4].

The correlation of CD44 expression with Ki-67 proliferative activity in studied meningioma cases.

VariablesCD44 expression
MildModerateMarked
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDp-value
Ki-673.22.48.8811.311.50.011

Representative figures for CD44 and Ki 67 expression in meningioma cases are shown in [Table/Fig-5,6 and 7] and [Table/Fig-8,9] respectively.

Mild CD44 immunohistochemical expression in meningioma (20X HPF).

Moderate CD44 immunohistochemical expression in meningioma (10X HPF).

Marked CD44 immunohistochemical expression in meningioma (40X HPF);

Low Ki-67 proliferative activity in meningioma (20X HPF).

High Ki-67 proliferative activity in meningioma (20X HPF).

Discussion

CD44, a member of cell adhesion molecule family is a cell surface glycoprotein that has a variety of functions, such as promoting cell proliferation, migration and transmitting survival signals [21]. In addition, CD44 is the first identified Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) marker accounting for tumour progression in multiple cancers [22,23]. Subsequently, many current researches investigated the role of this marker in CSCs detection and targeted cancer therapy [24,25].

In the current study, we aimed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of CD44 and Ki67 in forty cases of meningioma and to highlight their possible correlation with all clinicopathologic variables. Moreover, we aimed to elucidate the role of CD44 as CSC marker in meningioma proliferation through correlating the results of CD44 expression with Ki67 proliferative activity.

The results of this study showed that most meningioma patients were females (27/40) with female:male ratio reported 2.1:1. This figure was similar to that reported by Gassoum et al., where females constituted 61.9% of their patients with female:male ratio 1.6:1 [20].

Twenty one (52.5%) patients in our study were more than 50-year-old, while 19 patients (47.5%) were younger than 50 years. Slightly lower figures were reported by Gassoum et al., where 52.4% of their meningioma patients were in the age group 41 to 50 years [20].

CD44 and Ki67 immunohistochemical expression in meningioma cases were correlated with variable clinical data available in this work as patients’ age and sex but without any statistical significance reported as p>0.05.

In the present work, CD44 and Ki67 were significantly correlated with meningioma grade; CD44 was markedly expressed in 11 meningioma cases; two cases (18.2%) were meningioma grade I and, 9 cases (81.8%) were high grade meningioma II and III which was statistically significant (p<0.001). These results coincide with study done by Trenda et al., and Arsene et al., where a significant parallel increase (p<0.05) in CD44 expression in high grade meningioma compared to benign meningioma were reported [26,27].

The mean Ki-67 expression reported in this study was 2.9%, 10.4% and 19.0% in meningioma grade I, II and III respectively with statistical significance (p<0.001). Arsene D et al., reported almost near values as Ki-67 labelling index was 3.8% in grade I meningioma, 13.42% in grade II meningioma and 18% in grade III meningioma in their study [27].

CD44 was expressed in different histologic variants of meningiomas enrolled in this work as mild CD44 expression was mostly detected in benign grade I meninigiomas mostly in meningiothelial variant (33.3%), and only in one clear cell grade II meningioma (4.8%), while moderate CD44 expression was detected mostly in atypical grade II meningioma (62.5%) but only in 1 anaplastic grade III meningioma (12.5%) and 2 transitional grade I meningioma (25%). Marked CD44 expression was highly reported also in grade II meningioma (63.3%), followed by grade III anaplastic meningioma (18.2%) then finally grade I as 1 fibroblastic (9.1%) and 1 transitional meningioma (9.1%). These figures were similar to those reported by Gassoum et al., on Sudanese patients where strong CD44 expression was mostly reported in atypical grade II meningioma (100%) [20]. Arsene D et al., [27], didn’t report a specific association with any histological variant in the benign category which was also in agreement with our results. Trenda et al., similarly reported strong CD44 expression in atypical meningiomas, but differed in other variants results as no expression in fibroblastic meningiomas and moderate expression in the other subtypes of benign meningiomas were reported in their study [26].

In the current study, Ki-67 was significantly correlated (p=0.033) with brain invasiveness, suggesting that parenchymatous brain invasion is a marker of aggressive behaviour in meningioma. However, no significant correlation was reported regarding CD44 expression and brain invasion (p=0.190). Figarella-Branger et al., reported similar results regarding CD44 expression and brain invasiveness as CD44 was expressed in 4 out of 5 meningiomas demonstrating brain invasion without statistical significant relation mentioned in their study [10].

In our study, no significant correlation was detected between CD44 or Ki67 expression in meningioma cases and rate of tumour recurrence (p=0.476 and, p=0.109 respectively). However, a shift towards higher Ki-67 proliferative activity was noted in recurrent meningiomas (mean Ki-67 11.8%) than non- recurrent ones (mean Ki-67 was 5.8%). This was similar to Abramovich and Prayson study where higher Ki-67 proliferative activity was reported in recurrent meningiomas but without statistical significance (p=0.057; r=0.261) [15]. Also, this was in agreement with Arsene et al., results, where they reported that there was no particular expression of cell adhesion molecules including CD44 in the case of recurrent grade I meningioma included in their study [27].

Ki-67 expression was significantly associated with CD 44 expression in our study (p=0.01) which supports the role of CD44 in tumour proliferation and detection of aggressive behaviour in meningioma. This was in agreement with Arsene et al., where a shift toward parallel increase in the CD44 scores with Ki-67 expression was also clear, even though didn’t reach statistical significance (p=0.057; r=0.261) [27].

Thus, the combined evaluation of CD44 and Ki67 proliferation index can be extremely helpful in some borderline cases that don’t clearly fulfil the latest World Health Organization (WHO) histological criteria in diagnosing high grade meningioma. Moreover, CD44 targeted therapy in high grade meningioma should be investigated thoroughly as in breast cancer clinical trials.

Limitation

The main limitation of this study was lacking the correlation of CD44 and Ki 67 expression in different grades of meningioma with survival rate which we recommend in future studies.

Conclusion

In our study, we concluded that CD44 is a marker of aggressiveness in meningiomas as it was significantly highly expressed in grade II and III meningiomas and was positively correlated with higher Ki-67 proliferation indices. Moreover, Ki-67 proliferation activity was significantly correlated with higher meningioma grades and brain invasiveness. Therefore, researches should be carried out to identify the role of CD44 targeted therapy in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas as done in other tumours e.g., breast cancer.

References

[1]Schellinger KA, Propp JM, Villano JL, McCarthy BJ, Descriptive epidemiology of primary spinal cord tumours Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2008 87(2):173-79.  [Google Scholar]

[2]Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB, Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2010 99(3):307-14.  [Google Scholar]

[3]Tseng KY, Chung MH, Sytwu HK, Lee HM, Chen KY, Chang C, Osteopontin expression is a valuable marker for prediction of short-term recurrence in WHO grade I benign meningiomas J Neurooncol 2010 100(2):217-23.  [Google Scholar]

[4]Takei H, Bhattacharjee MB, Rivera A, Dancer Y, Powell SZ, New immunohistochemical markers in the evaluation of central nervous system tumours: A review of 7 selected adult and pediatric brain tumours Arch pathol lab Med 2007 131(2):234-41.  [Google Scholar]

[5]Terzi A, Saglam EA, Barak A, Soylemezoglu F, The significance of immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, p53, p21, and p16 in meningiomas tissue arrays Pathol Res Pract 2008 204(5):305-14.  [Google Scholar]

[6]Rooprai HK, Liyanage K, King A, Davies D, Martin K, Pilkington GJ, CD44 expression in human meningiomas: an immunocytochemical, immunohistochemical and flow cytometric analysis Int J Oncol 1999 1(5):855-60.  [Google Scholar]

[7]Naor D, Nedvetzki S, Golan I, Melnik L, Faitelson Y, CD44 in cancer Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2002 39(6):527-79.  [Google Scholar]

[8]Ponta H, Sherman L, Herrlich PA, CD44: from adhesion molecules to signaling regulators Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003 4(1):33-45.  [Google Scholar]

[9]Naruse M, Shibasaki K, Yokoyama S, Kurachi M, Ishizaki Y, Dynamic changes of CD44 expression from progenitors to subpopulations of astrocytes and neurons in developing cerebellum PLoS One 2013 8(1):e53109  [Google Scholar]

[10]Figarella-Branger D, Roche PH, Daniel L, Dufour H, Bianco N, Pellissier JF, Cell-adhesion molecules in human meningiomas: correlation with clinical and morphological data Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1997 23:113-22.  [Google Scholar]

[11]Rooprai HK, Liyanage K, King A, Davies D, Martin K, Pilkington GJ, CD44 expression in human meningiomas: An immunocytochemical, immunohistochemical and flow cytometric analysis Int J Oncol 1999 14:855-60.  [Google Scholar]

[12]Lewy-Trenda I, Omulecka A, Janczukowicz J, Papierz W, CD44 expression in human meningiomas: an immunohistochemical analysis Pol J Pathol 2004 55(1):33-37.  [Google Scholar]

[13]Panagopoulos AT, Lancellotti CL, Veiga JC, de Aguiar PH, Colquhoun A, Expression of cell adhesion proteins and proteins related to angiogenesis and fatty acid metabolism in benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas J Neurooncol 2008 89:73-87.  [Google Scholar]

[14]Ruiz J, Martinez A, Hernandez S, Zimman H, Ferrer M, Fernandez C, Clinicopathological variables, immunophenotype, chromosome 1p36 loss and tumour recurrence of 247 meningiomas grade I and II Histol Histopathol 2010 25:341-49.  [Google Scholar]

[15]Abramovich CM, Prayson RA, Histopathologic features and MIB-1 labeling indices in recurrent and nonrecurrent meningiomas Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999 123:793-800.  [Google Scholar]

[16]Devaprasath A, Chacko G, Diagnostic validity of the Ki-67 labeling index using the MIB-1 monoclonal antibody in the grading of meningiomas Neurol India 2003 51(3):336-40.  [Google Scholar]

[17]Roser F, Samii M, Ostertag H, Bellinzona M, The Ki-67 proliferation antigen in meningiomas Experience in 600 cases. Acta Neurochir 2004 146:37-44.  [Google Scholar]

[18]Commins DL, Atkinsom RD, Burnett ME, Review of meningeoma histopathology Neurosurg Focus 2007 23:1-9.  [Google Scholar]

[19]Bruna J, Brell M, Ferrer I, Gimenez-bonafe P, Tortosa A, Ki-67 proliferative index predicts clinical outcome in patients with atypical or anaplastic meningioma Neuropathology 2007 27(2):114-20.  [Google Scholar]

[20]Gassoum A, Arbab MA, Aldeaf SAH, Elhassan LA, Bashier BM, Saad MSA, CD44 expression in sudanese meningioma patients International Journal of Recent Scientific Research 2016 7(6):11900-04.  [Google Scholar]

[21]Naor D, Wallach-Dayan SB, Zahalka MA, Sionov RV, Involvement of CD44, a molecule with a thousand faces, in cancer dissemination Semin Cancer Biol 2008 18(4):260-67.  [Google Scholar]

[22]Zhang Z, Filho MS, Nör JE, The biology of head and neck cancer stem cells Oral Oncol 2012 48(1):1-9.  [Google Scholar]

[23]Rastogi P, Emergence of cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A therapeutic insight with literature review Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012 9(3):239-44.  [Google Scholar]

[24]Sayed SI, Dwivedi RC, Katna R, Garg A, Pathak KA, Implications of understanding Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) biology in head and neck squamous cell cancer Oral Oncol 2011 47(4):237-43.  [Google Scholar]

[25]Misra S, Heldin P, Hascall VC, Karamanos NK, Skandalis SS, Markwald RR, Hyaluronan-CD44 interactions as potential targets for cancer therapy FEBS J 2011 278(9):1429-43.  [Google Scholar]

[26]Trenda W, Omulecka A, Janczukowicz J, Papierz W, CD44 expression in human meningiomas: an immunohistochemical analysis Pol J Pathol 2004 55(1):33-37.  [Google Scholar]

[27]Arsene D, Comanescu M, Ardeleanu C, Adhesion cell molecules as potential markers of aggressiveness in meningiomas Rom J Morphol Embryol 2014 55(2):585-89.  [Google Scholar]