Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23785

Original article / research
Year : 2018 | Month : June | Volume : 12 | Issue : 6 | Page : NC05 - NC08

Reliability of Visual Field Index in Staging Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage

Neetha Kuzhuppilly, Shilpa Patil, Shibi Dev, Aditya Deo

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka, India. 2. Glaucoma Consultant, Department of Glaucoma, Aastha Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Head of Department, Department of Glaucoma, Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Consultant Ophthalmologist and Glaucoma Surgeon, Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Infirmary and Laser Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Neetha Kuzhuppilly
Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: cinnineetha@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Standard automated perimetry is integral to the testing of visual function in glaucoma. Classification of glaucomatous visual field defects into different severity levels is important to guide effective management; but the available classification systems may be cumbersome and impractical on a daily basis.

Aim: To quantify, correlate and analyse the relation between Visual Field Index (VFI) and the stages of glaucomatous field damage as defined by Hodapp Parrish Anderson (HPA). To check the validity of Glaucoma Staging Indices (GSI), which is a new glaucomatous field classification system dependent on VFI.

Materials and Methods: The study was a prospective, observational analysis of consecutive visual field tests done between August 2015 and March 2016. The Institutional Ethical Committee approved the protocol, and participants who gave written informed consent were included in the study. Patients underwent a comprehensive eye examination including standard automated perimetry with Humphrey Visual Field Analyser. Data was collected from each visual field and the fields were evaluated and classified into four stages- Normal, Early defect, Moderate defect or Severe defect based on HPA classification. HPA and Geological Strength Index (GSI) classification systems were compared and analysed with Kappa analysis.

Results: Analysis of 170 visual fields of 95 patients showed that VFI was significantly different between Normal, Early defect, Moderate defect and Severe defects as classified with HPA staging, p<0.001. VFI had strong positive correlation with Mean Deviation (MD), r=0.984, p<0.001 and non-linear correlation with Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD), r = -0.472, p<0.001. On comparing HPA staging with GSI, ?=0.633, p<0.001. VFI, MD and PSD in each of the severity stages across the two classification systems showed no significant differences (p>0.05).

Conclusion: In established glaucoma, GSI is a good dependable staging system. It is readily available on the single field print out and can be a quick reference for decision making in the management of glaucoma patients.

Keywords

Glaucoma staging indices, Humphrey field analyser, Glaucoma management

How to cite this article :

Neetha Kuzhuppilly, Shilpa Patil, Shibi Dev, Aditya Deo. RELIABILITY OF VISUAL FIELD INDEX IN STAGING GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL FIELD DAMAGE. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2018 June [cited: 2018 Jun 23 ]; 12:NC05-NC08. Available from
http://www.jcdr.net/back_issues.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2018&month=June&volume=12&issue=6&page=NC05-NC08&id=11620

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34541.11620

Date of Submission: Oct 26, 2017
Date of Peer Review: Jan 10, 2018
Date of Acceptance: Apr 05, 2018
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2018

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2016: 132.37
  • SCOPUS
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Embase & EMbiology
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com