Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 314423

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : August | Volume : 6 | Issue : 6 | Page : 955 - 958 Full Version

Haemoglobin Estimation by Non-cyanide Methods


Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2299
V. Kalyan Chakravarthy, D. Naveen Chandra, B. Santhoshi Prasanna, T. Jaya Mastan Rao, D. Ranga Rao

1. Associate Professor 2. Associate Professor 3. MBBS, 2nd Year Student 4. Professor 5. Professor & HOD NAME OF DEPARTMENT(S)/INSTITUTION(S) TO WHICH THE WORK IS ATTRIBUTED: Dr. Pinnamaneni Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Foundation, Chinnaoutpalli, Gannavaram, Krishna District - 521286.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. V. Kalyan Chakravarthy
Associate Proffesor
Department Of Pathology
Dr. Pinnamaneni Institute of Medical Sciences & Research
Foundation, Chinnaoutpalli, Gannavaram,
Krishna District - 521286
E-mail: Kalyancv74@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Haemoglobin is an oxygen carrying protein in the red blood cells. It is estimated by the haemoglobincyanide method (HiCN). This method is known to be hazardous to the environment and occasionally harmful to the laboratory personnel also.

Aims and Objectives: To compare and study the haemoglobin concentrations which were estimated by cyanide and non-cyanide methods. To suggest the advantages of the cyanide free methods over the cyanide methods. To assess whether these methods were better as compared to the haemoglobincyanide method, for medical teaching, blood bank camps and for laboratory investigations.

Materials and Methods: 2000 samples in which haemoglobin estimation was done by the haemoglobincyanide method, the Sodium Lauryl Sulphate method and a modified alkaline haematin method which used cetrimide were compared and statistically analyzed by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results: The haemoglobin concentrations which were estimated by the Sodium Lauryl Sulphate method and the modified alkaline haematin method were similar to those which were obtained by the conventional cyanmethaemoglobin method, with r=0.986 and r=0.996 respectively.

Conclusion: The modified alkaline haematin method was as accurate as the cyanmethaemoglobin method. It was economical. The toxic effects of cyanide can be prevented by using this method commercially.

Keywords

Haemoglobincyanide, Cetrimide, Sodium Lauryl Sulphate

INTRODUCTION
Haemoglobin is an iron containing, oxygen-transport metalloprotein in the red blood cells of all the vertebrates (with the exception of the fish family, Channichthyidae) (1) as well as in the tissues of some invertebrates (1). The haemoglobin in the blood carries oxygen from the respiratory organs to the rest of the body (2). Haemoglobin is estimated by the haemoglobincyanide method (HiCN) in laboratories, as it is a relatively stable method and as it has an internationally accepted reference standard calibrator (2), (3), but the potassium cyanide which is used in the haemoglobincyanide method is toxic at high concentrations, making the management of the safe disposal of this reagent difficult (4). Automated cell counters now use Sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) instead of toxic reagents (5). The commercially available Hemosafe solution (which contains sodium lauryl sulphate) is less stable as compared to the Drabkin solution, the reagent which is used in HiCN (5). Hence, for the haemoglobin assay, non toxic, economical and more stable chemicals are needed (4).

2 Non-cyanide methods, the Sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) method and the modified alkaline haematin method (MAH) which uses sodium tetraborate and ceramide have been chosen to evaluate haemoglobin with respect to the cost, standard results, stability and safety in comparison to the haemoglobincyanide method. If the haemoglobin values which are obtained by these methods are comparable to those which are derived from the standard haemoglobincyanide method, these cyanide free methods can be insisted to be used in teaching institutions, blood bank camps and laboratories, to avoid biohazards to the their staff and the environment.

Material and Methods

This study was a comparative and a hospital based study. It was conducted within 2 months in the hospital, with a sample size of 2000 randomly selected patients. Ethical clearance was obtained from hospital ethical committee. Haemoglobin was estimated by the haemoglobincyanide method, the Sodium Lauryl Sulphate method and a modified alkaline haematin method which used cetrimide. The photocolourimeter which was used for these procedures was ELICO CL 157. The photocolourimeter was standardized by repeating the same sample 10 times at different timings. The absorbance was read and the co-efficient of variation was calculated. Pipette calibration was done by pipetting the same sample 10 times and the mean , SD and the co-efficient of variation was measured.

1) The Haemoglobincyanide Method:
Drabkin’s reagent was obtained from Ensure Biotech Pvt.Ltd. [with a 10ml vial of the standard. (Lot no: E 19; Expiry Date: October-2012)]. The absorbance of cyanmethaemoglobin was directly proportional to the haemoglobin concentration in the sample.

Procedure:
The reagent was Drabkins solution, which was ready to use. The standard absorbance was read before the start of the procedure. 0.02ml of the test sample was added to 4.0ml of Drabkin’s solution (4). The diluted sample was allowed to stand for 10 minutes, it was then transferred to a cuvette and the optical density was determined at 540nm against a blank of Drabkin’s solution. The value of the sample was determined by interpolation from the graph which was obtained (4),(6).

2) The Sodium Lauryl Sulphate (SLS) Method:
HEMOSAFE from the Tulip group Coral containing SLS - Reagent - 1000ml.

Hemosafe SLS – Standard (60mg/dl) – 10ml:
The total conversion to the SLS-Haemoglobin was rapid and SLS converted haemoglobin fully to methaemoglobin.

Procedure:
0.02ml of the test sample was added to 5.0ml of sodium lauryl sulphate. The diluted sample was allowed to stand for 5 minutes, it was then transferred to a cuvette and the optical density was determined at 540nm against a blank of the SLS solution. The value of the sample was determined by interpolation from the graph which was obtained from the standard (4),(5).

3. The Modified Alkaline Hematin Method (MAH)

MATERIALS
Borate working solution Sodium tetra borate (borax) – 1.9gm/lit, Sodium hydroxide – 2gm/l, Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide – 10gm/lit. RN (Br) (CH3) R (Cetrimide) was used as lysing agent. It is a quaternary ammonium compound which is a crystalline powder with a disinfectant activity. As a modification, the original compound which we used was 0.5ml/100ml sol. of readily available SAVLON. (Cetrimide 3% w/v and Chlorhexidine Gluconate solution 0.5% v/v).

Principle:
Cetrimide acts by lysing the erythrocytes and precipitating haemoglobin which conjugates with boronic acid to form a red precipitate which is read at 540nm.

Procedure:
0.02ml of the test sample was added to 3.0ml of the borate working solution. The diluted sample was allowed to stand for 5 minutes, it was then transferred to a cuvette and the optical density was determined at 540nm against a blank of the borate working solution. A standard curve was plotted for the different haemoglobin values which were obtained by using Drabkin’s solution and its standard, against the optical density which was obtained from the borate working solution. Depending on the optical density values, the results were compared with the standard curve. The stability of the modified alkaline haematin reagent at room temperature was assessed by preparing solutions of alkaline haematin and cyanmethaemoglobin from the samples of whole blood, and comparing the absorbance at different time intervals over a 24 hours period. The time which was taken for complete haemolysis was calculated by noting the absorbance values every minute and by centrifuging the samples to look for the cell buttons. There was no cell button formation from the third minute onwards. The ability to denature foetal haemoglobin (HbF) was assessed by comparing the haemoglobin values of 20 samples of cord blood by using the modified alkaline haematin reagent and Drabkin’s solution. These samples were used for estimating the stability of the modified alkaline haematin reagent and the HbF and have not been included in the current data (4),(7),(8).

Results

The haemoglobin which was estimated, ranged from 3.8gms to 20gms and the patients who were included in this study were newborns to 88year old. The optical density was measured at 540nm for all the 3 methods. The reaction completion time for the haemoglobincyanide method was 10 minutes, whereas for the sodium lauryl sulphate method and the alkaline haematin method, it was less than 3 minutes. The stability of the haemochromogenswhich were formed by the modified alkaline haematin method, which were observed at 540nm, produced stable absorbance readings which remained unchanged till four days consecutively. The correlation between the haemoglobincyanide method, the sodium lauryl sulphate method and the alkaline haematin method was done by using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A good correlation was observed between the non-cyanide methods and the haemoglobincyanide method. The correlation coefficients of 0.98 and 0.99 were statistically significant at p<0.000, which indicated that the calculated value, r was unlikely to have resulted from a random chance.

Discussion

Haemoglobin estimation is one of the most common tests which are done at the bedsides of patients, at primary health care centres, in antenatal clinics; during the follow up of management of anaemic patients and during the screening for anaemia among blood donors [9, 10]. A good number of methods is available for haemoglobin estimation, with the colourimetric method being the most popular one. The manual HiCN method was phased out as a routine method and it gradually became a reference method (2). Other factors like legislation which affects the transportation of the reagents and the control of substances such as cyanides which are hazardous to health, have led to the development of methods which do not employ cyanide for the determination of haemoglobin (4). In our country, approximately 70% of the laboratories still use the manual HiCN method for Hb estimation in the rural areas (4). The cyanmethemoglobin method has been accepted as a standard method (2) for Hb estimation. This method uses a stable standard solution which helps in deriving uniform and consistent results. But this solution contains potassium cyanide which in high quantities, makes its safe disposal difficult.

Sodium lauryl sulfate converts haemoglobin into methaemoglobin in the order of oxyhaemoglobin, haemochrome and methaemoglobin by its oxidative activity (5).Therefore, unlike other methods, this method does not need oxidative reagents and it does not generate toxic wastes such as KCN and NaN3 which cause environmental pollution (10). The solution is photosensitive and less stable and the absorbance reading has to be taken within one hour. This solution is excellent for use in automated cell counters (5). The alkaline haematin method (AHD-575) has been evaluated extensively by some authors in other countries and east Africa [7,8,11]. There are no Indian studies which have been done, which have compared the alkaline haematin method with HiCN (4), except for the recent study which has been done by Vinay B. Shah et al.,(4). The alkaline haematin method had been promising, but the lysing reagent which was used was Triton X100 which had made the reagent costly. Vinay B. Shah et al., (4) used Myristyl trimethyl ammonium chloride. In our study, we tried it with commercially available Savlon (Cetrimide 3% w/v and Chlorhexidine Gluconate solution 1.5% v/v). As it is easily available and economical, this can be used in peripheral centers in the alkaline boronate method.

Both the above non-cyanide methods were compared for repeatability, reagent stability, and accuracy in correlation with the cyanmethhaemoglobin method and both the reagents gave excellent results. The quantity of the reagent which was used by the MAH was low (3ml) as compared to that which was used by the other two methods (5ml). Both sodium lauryl sulfate and cetrimide have been used as detergents in shampoo and soap industries extensively.Sodium tetra borate is a well-known food additive and it has been thought to cause gastric symptoms while it was used in high quantities. No other definite complications have been reported. In both the non cyanide methods, the absorbance was read at 540nm on a colourimeter. These methods can also use LED haemoglobinometers with the same accuracy.

The stability of the modified alkaline haematin reagent promises a standard preparation for this method exclusively. The present study was done on 2000 samples and the alkaline borate method was modified by using Savlon as a lysing agent, which is easily available at primary health centres. The correlation between HiCN and the MAH was excellent and it was comparable with the findings of a study which was done by Vinya B. Shah et al., (4) in 2011.

Conclusion

The cyanmethemoglobin (HiCN) method for measuring haemoglobin is used extensively worldwide; its advantage is the ready availability of a stable and internationally accepted referencestandard/calibrator. However, its use may create a problem, as the disposal of large volumes of reagent which contains cyanide may constitute a potential bio-toxic hazard. As an alternative, the nontoxic sodium lauryl sulphate and the modified alkaline haematin methods have been used. The results are reproducible as for HiCN for measuring haemoglobin at all concentrations. Hence, these methods can be employed in primary health care centres, teaching hospitals and diagnostic laboratories.

References

1.
Bruce Kristin O’Brien Sidell. Expression in Antarctic icefishes. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2006; 209: 1791–1802.
2.
Bull BS, ICSH Expert Panel on cytometry, ICSH recommendations for “surrogate reference” method for packed cell volume. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1966 Oct; 20(4):172–75.
3.
Theodore Kuttner, Haemoglobin estimation by using an 8 element stressed linear array. JAMA, 1916; 16(18):1370-73.
4.
Shah VB, Shah BS, Puranik GV. Evaluation of noncyanide methods for hemoglobin estimation. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 2011; (54): 764-68.
5.
Lewis SM, Garwey B, Manning R, Sharp SA, Wardle J. Lauryl sulphate haemoglobin: a non-hazardous substance for HiCN in haemoglobinometry. Clin Lab Haematology 1991; 13(3): 279-90.
6.
Cookson P, Sutherland J, Cardigan R. A simple spectrophotometric method for the quantification of residual haemoglobin in platelet concentrates. Vox Sang 2004; 87: 264-71.
7.
Zander R, Lang W, Wolf HU. Alkaline haematin D-575: a new tool for the determination of hemoglobin as an alternative to the cyanmethemoglobin method. Clin Chim Acta. 1984 ; 136(1): 83-93.
8.
Moharram NM, Aouad R, Busaidy S, Fabricius A, Heller S, Wood WG, et al. An international collaborative assessment study of the AHD- 575 method for the measurement of blood haemoglobin. East Mediterr J 2006; 12:722-34.
9.
Theodorsen L. An automated cyanide – free method for haemoglobin determination on Technicon. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1990; 50: 643-48.
10.
Bhaskaran P. Validation of hemoglobin estimation by using Hemocue. Indian J. Paediar 2003;70(1)25-28.
11.
Lema OE, Carter JY, Arube PA, Munafu CG, Wangai MW, Rees PH. Evaluation of the alkaline haematin D-575 method for haemoglobin estimation in east Africa. Bull World Health Organ 1994; (72): 937-41.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4502:2299

Date of Submission: May 07, 2012
Date of Peer Review: May 16, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jun 10, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com