Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 69124

ReferencesTable and Figures
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2010 | Month : February | Volume : 4 | Issue : 1 | Page : 2098 - 2104 Full Version

Application of Lean Thinking in Pharmaceutical cGMP Training


Published: February 1, 2010 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2010/.651
FERNANDES F*, PANDE S** , MURTY P N***

* M. Pharm, (PhD) Pharmacy, Berhampur University, **Senior Vice President, Corporate Quality Assurance, Glenmark Pharmaceutical Limited, Mumbai, ***Principal and Professor of Pharmacy, Royal College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Behrampur, (India).

Correspondence Address :
Francis Fernandes
E.mail:fransha.ape@gmail.com

Review
Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) consist of the regulations, guidelines and recommended practices issued by the FDA and other international regulatory authorities, as well as by the current industry practice. They form the basis for the production and the testing of pharmaceutical products that are safe and effective for human use. Regulatory publications are necessarily vague so that manufacturers have the opportunity to incorporate innovations into their products. Thus, the practitioners of cGMP must strive to be up to date on the latest innovations. cGMP compliance ensures that the products which are produced, meet specific requirements for identity, strength, quality, and purity.
Developing a Successful Training Programme is increasingly becoming an essential requirement to satisfy regulatory agencies; for example:

In the US, the CGMP Guide published by the FDA defines in 21 CFR § 211.25: “Training shall be in the particular operations that the employee performs and in current good manufacturing practice (including the current good manufacturing practice regulations in this chapter and written procedures required by these regulations) as they relate to the employee‘s functions. Training in current good manufacturing practice shall be conducted by qualified individuals on a continuing basis and with sufficient frequency to assure that the employees remain familiar with the CGMP requirements which are applicable to them.

In Europe, the requirements for the GMP-compliant manufacture of drug products are laid down in the EU GMP Guide. Chapter 2 says that: “The manufacturer should provide training for all the personnel whose duties take them into production areas or into control laboratories (including the technical, maintenance and cleaning personnel) and for other personnel whose activities could affect the quality of the product.”
The Canadian GMPs require that: "All personnel must be aware of the principles of GMP that affect them and must receive initial and continuing training which are relevant to their job responsibilities." Completing our proven training programs will ensure you meet these training requirements (GMP Regulation C.02.006 Interpretation 5).

The Indian “Schedule M” Part I, Section 6.6 requires that: The licensee shall ensure in accordance with a written instruction that all personnel in the production area or into Quality Control Laboratories shall receive training which is appropriate to the duties and responsibilities which are assigned to them. They shall be provided with regular in-service training.


Who is Responsible for the training program? The procedure should define as to who is responsible in the organization oversight of training efforts, design and delivery of the training events and auditing to be sure that a training program is working. Normally, the responsibility of GMP training is a part of the quality assurance (QA) department or there is a separate GMP training cell with the support of the individual operations area. Some companies include GMP and skills training as part of the human resources (HR) organization. Use caution; some HR groups are not sensitive enough to the special compliance issues that are part of GMP training: It is not just another “soft skill” topic, a “nice-to know” course, or one that a generalist can teach.

Qualification of instructors. GMPs require that instructors be qualified; in a cGMP training procedure, you have a chance to define what that means. One way is to establish minimum instructor requirements such as successful completion of basic and advanced GMP training and communication skills such as successful completion of a presentation skills workshop. Then, for each course, define what additional knowledge or skills the instructor needs. For example, an instructor of a course in basic GMP and quality auditing should have experience as an auditor. Sometimes it is difficult to find good trainers who also have solid experience or knowledge in a particular technical area. For example, I’ve seen experts in computer validation who are competent in developing and executing protocols, but are noticeably uncomfortable in leading a class. That is an excellent opportunity for co-teaching: an experienced instructor helping to lead the formal sections of the course and the expert serving as a resource to relate experiences and answer questions. If a co-teaching approach is used, both people should be qualified as a team, and that should be provided for in your training procedure. The quality unit should review and approve potential instructors.

Who is to be trained? In this part of your procedure, identify the general audiences for training. This includes operations, maintenance, lab and technical staff; it also includes a permanent management (A person who has signed a letter of offer with regards to permanent employment. This person may either work full time or part time.) (read 21 CFR 211.25b), contract (A person who provides a service or performs a task on behalf of a company, but is not employed by the company.), temporary (A person who has signed a letter of offer with regards to employment, where the hours of work are not regular and may vary, based on the business requirements to meet a short-term need), and consulting personnel. As I work with drug and pharmaceutical managers, I encourage them to give some GMP training to everyone. Because GMPs are product-critical, everyone in an organization needs to have some “GMP literacy.” As you consider audiences for training, do not forget senior- and executive-level management who make GMP-related decisions. Temporary (temps) and contract personnel present a particular training challenge. Organizations like to use them for flexibility and to keep head counts low. That doesn’t excuse a company from the GMP procedure training requirements. One company that made extensive use of temps was told by local FDA investigators that FDA would review temp and contractor training in future inspections.

Types of training covered by the procedure. GMPs call for training personnel in the application and interpretation of GMP regulations and in the tasks that they perform. Various types of training programmes are conducted and documented at pharmaceutical manufacturing locations.

The various types of Training programmes are
Induction Training
cGMP Training for New joiners.
Refresher cGMP Training
SOP Training
External Training
Specific Training
On the Job Training
Snap test
Retraining

Induction Training:
During the Induction training program, any individual joining a manufacturing plant as a trainee or as a new employee has to undergo Induction Training. The QA or Training Dept personnel brief them on the following topics:
Personal hygiene
cGMP and its importance in the pharmaceutical industry.
The briefing is done orally and the document is signed off by the QA or Training personnel in the Training and the records are retained.

cGMP Training for New Joiners:
This program covers all new employees and trainees who join the organization. During this training, Employees are categorized into two groups for the cGMP training program.
Group – I comprises of employees with a Pharmaceutical Background either in Education or Experience.
Group – II comprises of employees without a Pharmaceutical background either in Education or experience.
Training is conducted for each category of employees on the following topics.
Basics of cGMP
Glossary of cGMP
Quality Management System
Process and Documents, flow / controls and procedures
Video CDs on relevant topics are also being included.
cGMP Training is conducted as classroom training. The training is followed by an assessment and is documented.

3. Refresher cGMP Training:
This training is classroom training which is conducted once in 6 months to 1 year duration covering cGMP requirements.
For refreshers, cGMP Training programs employees are divided into 2 groups.
Group – I
Group – II
Separate sessions are conducted for each category of employees.

4. SOP Training:
All employees undergo training on the procedures of the respective functions. SOP training is also given to employees from cross function wherever applicable. SOP training is given on the job or as classroom training. Refresher training is carried out whenever there is a major procedural change. These trainings are assessed and documented.

5. External Training:
The concerned department HOD nominates people for External Training, depending on the type of training and the need of training. The nominee submits a copy of all the training material pertaining to technical training to the QA or the Training department.

6. Specific Training:
Specific training is conducted in accordance with identified training. Specific training is on the job or Classroom training. The training is documented.

7. On the Job Training:
On the job training is carried out in the departments, wherever applicable. On the job training is assessed by the trainer with an assessment or a demonstration of the procedure by the trainee and the same is documented in the assessment record.

8. Snap Test:
Snap tests are surprise tests conducted in various departments on various topics. Snap tests are conducted to check the awareness and adherence to the systems and procedures.

9. Retraining:
Retraining is given to employees who are not qualified in any of the above assessments.
The minimum qualifying marks for the cGMP, refresher cGMP, SOP training and Snap Test assessments shall be 75%.
The score in the given assignments are converted to %, if the maximum marks are not equal to 100.
All training documents should be retained for a period of five years.
The same are to be destroyed and documented in the Destruction Record.

.When training is conducted. GMPs require that training be ongoing. Most companies conduct formal GMP training or reinforcement training at least annually; some do it twice a year; a few do it quarterly. Training on specific GMP-related skills (such as conducting root-cause analysis) and on new, revised, and unchanged procedures should be considered here as well. (In an upcoming article, I will discuss frequency of SOP training.) Be realistic as you set training intervals so that you can actually accomplish what is defined.

Learner assessments. Your company’s use of testing or assessment is described in this part of the training procedure, including the types of assessment used (such as pen and paper, “orals,” computer-based or performance-based). A particularly important element is to determine what constitutes passing and what happens when an employee does not pass a test. You do not want to create the awkward situation of a person independently performing a GMP task on which he or she has been assessed and failed. Consideration also must be given to other legal issues of testing on the job if it in any way affects a person’s salary or position.

Maintenance of training materials. FDA and regulatory agency expectations regarding GMP and regulatory compliance change over time. An SOP should include a provision for periodic review and the updating of training courses and events. All changes should be approved by the quality unit before being implemented. The plan also should consider the impact of new content on those who have already taken the course; alternatives to retaking the full course may be adequate.

Documentation of participation in training events. Several elements figure into documenting when someone completes a training course. For leader led sessions, the minimum information is a sign-in sheet with the person’s name, signature, name and number of the course, date of the session and the instructor’s name and signature. The participant’s signature attests that he or she has attended the complete session; the instructor’s signature attests that the program was given and that the people listed did attend. Many companies enter the attendance list into a training management system e.g. Training Tracker. Your procedure should define how this is done, including verifying the transcription, retaining the sign-in sheets and controlling the system. Some e-learning courseware automatically feeds completion and testing information into a training management system. If such software is used, it also should be described in the procedure. If testing scores or pass–fail assessments are collected, it is useful to include them in the training management system.

Attendance in outside training and educational events (such as conferences and technical meetings) also should be documented because it contributes to a person’s “education, training, and experience.” Copies of certificates, continuing educational units (CEUs) and program outlines or mailers are useful records to retain. Some electronic training management systems have provisions for documenting outside events. Your procedure should define where such information is kept (preferably not as part of the person’s confidential personnel files) and how long it should be retained (typically several years beyond the last date of the individual’s employment).
Your training procedure also should consider keeping records on temporary and contract personnel who must meet GMP training expectations. Training management systems often are tied into a company’s personnel and payroll database, which does not include temporary or contract people.

Documents and Records

1. Training Docket:
Training Dockets are prepared for every Training which consists of Training Material (If Applicable), Training Key or Questionnaire (If Applicable), Training Record, Filled in Questionnaire (If Applicable) and Training Summary (If Applicable).

Personal Training Record
It is the responsibility of every individual to maintain and regularly update the Personal Training Record for each and every Training attended.

File of Induction Training: Current format of the HRD for Induction.
File of cGMP Training for New joiners: Training record, Training material with Key to questionnaire.
File of Refresher cGMP Training: Training record, Training material with Key to questionnaire.
File of SOP Training: Training record.
File of External Training
File of Specific Training: Training record,
File of On the job Training: Training record
File of Snap Test
File of Personal Training Record: Personal training
Certification of the employee
Trainer Qualification records

Case Study: Application lean thinking in the Pharma cGMP Training Department

This study is the implementation of lean thinking concepts, tools and processes in the Training department of the pharmaceutical formulation manufacturing unit, which is responsible for the approval of various elements of the training Program. The training department is a part of the Quality Assurance Section. The QA Section reviews and approves the GMP related training courses which are particularly important. The QA Section makes sure that the courses are completed and accurate and covers topics by using examples that are relevant and meaningful to the learners. The quality unit also reviews and approves GMP-training curricula for job functions or respective positions.

LEAN THINKING
Fundamental to lean thinking is the conversion of waste into customer-defined value (Womack, 1992). The training department serves four functions: Training Identification, Planning, Training and evaluation. Teaching is the most important function by the concern of the Training department and the SOP of the Training. Employees or Learners who join this respective manufacturing unit, are consumers of knowledge. Therefore, the study of lean thinking concepts, tools and processes concentrate on delivering values to these employees (Womack, 1996). Value can be defined as GMP knowledge that employees use in their Job work and activities. The ultimate value that employees look for, can be divided into two parts: value to the Job i.e. cGMP compliance and value to personal interest. The value that employees can receive from the Training department depends primarily on two factors. One factor can be described as what employees learn, which depends on the Training topics structured under the programs which are provided by the training department and the details of knowledge under each programme.
The second factor is how employees learn. Because both factors depend on the Training department, the Training Department is responsible for structuring programs to provide the employees with a broad background in Pharmaceutical GMP and in-depth focus in their areas of work and to transfer the knowledge to the employees in the most effective ways.
There are two significant parts in delivering value to employees;what the employees learn and how they learn it. There is only one process that adds value to the employees in the pharmaceutical manufacturing unit and it is the process of transferring knowledge, which combines two parts to deliver value to the employees. Two important processes which deliver value to the employees are: the process of transferring knowledge to the employees and the process of assessing employees for the knowledge that they receive. Transferring knowledge to employees should include the objectives of each program and what they will learn. The “assessing employees” step should be able to evaluate the employees’ performance to determine if they have learned the material.

1. THE PROCESS OF TRANSFERRING THE KNOWLEDGE TO EMPLOYEES

Program Objectives
The objectives of each training should be stated precisely. Employees are entitled to know what the Trainer expects them to learn. The whole course should be in place before the training begins. The Objectives should specify the performance measurement method that can be used by the employees and their Trainers.

Program Nature
The main objective of the training department is to have the Employees achieve the full understanding of the program. The Training Department cannot expect all Employees to master the program at the same time, but personalized lessons for each employee should be implemented to effectively deliver value to the organization. Smaller amounts of material are more digestible than larger amounts and the Employees will learn better if they are given frequent and immediate rewards.

Program Delivery
Because the whole programs are in place before the employees are enrolled, the trainer’s responsibility for each program will be different from the traditional one. The program will be changed from different department - employee.

Modules
Two main characteristics found in GMP programs in the Training Department, are the content of knowledge and the application of knowledge. The instructional types of content-based knowledge must be self-contained and the Employees should be able to repeat these instructions without trouble. The application-based knowledge can be transferred to Employees in the form of instructions that let them practice to use the knowledge. The examples of these instructions are lab studyies, work projects, workshops, group discussions, problem solving and evaluations.

Support Systems
In order to keep the changes moving smoothly, the support system is created to help the Employees in the changed environment of the program. The support system includes creating on-line training and group communication and making the information available to everybody.

2. THE PROCESS OF ASSESSING EMPLOYEES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED

Test
The employees should be examined to see if they have achieved the stated objectives. The tests should provide immediate feedback to the Employees so that they would have a chance to go back to the materials and achieve the objectives in the next attempt. The trainer should talk with an employee who needs help.

Grading
The grading system is divided into two parts; The Attendance and tests. There will be no marks for training attendance. In the test part, the Employees can take the test as many times as they need to pass it.

3. THE LEAN EDUCATION FLOWCHART
The figure below shows the lean process in the Training Department. By using this flowchart, the Trainer can monitor the Employees and respond to their actions quickly. Furthermore, this information can be used as an improvement opportunity. The trainer will be able to see as to which section the majority of employees have problem with. So he/she can make the necessary changes to reduce problems and improve the quality. When information from tests, questions from Employees and discussion with Employees and department heads are used, the opportunities for improvement are endless.

The expected results of lean training and the comparison of lean training with traditional training are shown in the following (Table/Fig 1),
(Table/Fig 2). The Comparison of Lean training with Traditional training

References

1.
“FDA Drug CGMP Warning Letters from FY 1999,” The Gold Sheet 2000; 34(3): 9–16 .
2.
Good Manufacturing Practices, 1998 Edition, Health Canada, Personnel, C.02.006 rationale (Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 1998).
3.
R. Tetzlaff, “A Systematic Approach to GMP Training,” Pharmaceutical Technology 1982; 6(11): 42–51 .
4.
J.L.Vesper, Training for the Healthcare Manufacturing Industries (Interpharm Press, Engelwood, CO, 1993) (5) Lean Aerospace Initiative. Available: http://web.mit.edu/lean

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com